Cargando…
Response to Correspondence from Kolstoe and colleagues concerning our paper entitled, Research approvals iceberg: How a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
In their letter to the Editor in this issue, Kolstoe and Carpenter challenge a core aspect of our recently published case study of research approvals [BMC Medical Ethics 20:7] by arguing that we conflate research ethics with governance and funding processes. Amongst the key concerns of the authors a...
Autores principales: | Petrova, Mila, Barclay, Stephen |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31870356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0433-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Research approvals iceberg: how a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
por: Petrova, Mila, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Response to correspondence from Koerner and colleagues concerning our paper entitled: The effect of diluting povidone-iodine on bacterial growth associated with speech
por: Gnanasekaran, Sivashanth, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Research approvals iceberg: helping it melt away
por: Kolstoe, Simon E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Response to correspondence from Hays and colleagues concerning our paper entitled, use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States
por: Cohen, Dena E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Vaccination Papers Approved
por: Dillingham, Thomas M.
Publicado: (1898)