Cargando…
A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data
BACKGROUND: The Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) are discovered to be tightly associated with cancers, so accurately detecting them is one of the most important tasks in the cancer genomics. A series of CNAs detection methods have been proposed and new ones are still being developed. Due to the comple...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3266-7 |
_version_ | 1783482679821336576 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Fei |
author_facet | Luo, Fei |
author_sort | Luo, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) are discovered to be tightly associated with cancers, so accurately detecting them is one of the most important tasks in the cancer genomics. A series of CNAs detection methods have been proposed and new ones are still being developed. Due to the complexity of CNAs in cancers, no CNAs detection method has been accepted as the gold standard caller. Several evaluation works have made attempts to reveal typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. Limited by the scale of evaluation data, these different comparison works don’t reach a consensus and the researchers are still confused on how to choose one proper CNAs caller for their analysis. Therefore, it needs a more comprehensive evaluation of typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. RESULTS: In this work, we use a large-scale real dataset from CAGEKID consortium to evaluate total 12 typical CNAs detection methods. These methods are most widely used in cancer researches and always used as benchmark for the newly proposed CNAs detection methods. This large-scale dataset comprises of SNP array data on 94 samples and the whole genome sequencing data on 10 samples. Evaluations are comprehensively implemented in current scenarios of CNAs detection, which include that detect CNAs on SNP array data, on sequencing data with tumor and normal matched samples and on sequencing data with single tumor sample. Three SNP based methods are firstly ranked. Subsequently, the best SNP based method’s results are used as benchmark to compare six matched samples based methods and three single tumor sample based methods in terms of the preprocessing, recall rate, Jaccard index and segmentation characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey thoroughly reveals 12 typical methods’ superiority and inferiority. We explain why methods show specific characteristics from a methodological standpoint. Finally, we present the guiding principle for choosing one proper CNAs detection method under specific conditions. Some unsolved problems and expectations are also addressed for upcoming CNAs detection methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6929333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69293332019-12-30 A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data Luo, Fei BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: The Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) are discovered to be tightly associated with cancers, so accurately detecting them is one of the most important tasks in the cancer genomics. A series of CNAs detection methods have been proposed and new ones are still being developed. Due to the complexity of CNAs in cancers, no CNAs detection method has been accepted as the gold standard caller. Several evaluation works have made attempts to reveal typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. Limited by the scale of evaluation data, these different comparison works don’t reach a consensus and the researchers are still confused on how to choose one proper CNAs caller for their analysis. Therefore, it needs a more comprehensive evaluation of typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. RESULTS: In this work, we use a large-scale real dataset from CAGEKID consortium to evaluate total 12 typical CNAs detection methods. These methods are most widely used in cancer researches and always used as benchmark for the newly proposed CNAs detection methods. This large-scale dataset comprises of SNP array data on 94 samples and the whole genome sequencing data on 10 samples. Evaluations are comprehensively implemented in current scenarios of CNAs detection, which include that detect CNAs on SNP array data, on sequencing data with tumor and normal matched samples and on sequencing data with single tumor sample. Three SNP based methods are firstly ranked. Subsequently, the best SNP based method’s results are used as benchmark to compare six matched samples based methods and three single tumor sample based methods in terms of the preprocessing, recall rate, Jaccard index and segmentation characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey thoroughly reveals 12 typical methods’ superiority and inferiority. We explain why methods show specific characteristics from a methodological standpoint. Finally, we present the guiding principle for choosing one proper CNAs detection method under specific conditions. Some unsolved problems and expectations are also addressed for upcoming CNAs detection methods. BioMed Central 2019-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6929333/ /pubmed/31874603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3266-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Luo, Fei A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data |
title | A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data |
title_full | A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data |
title_fullStr | A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data |
title_short | A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data |
title_sort | systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real snp array and deep sequencing data |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3266-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luofei asystematicevaluationofcopynumberalterationsdetectionmethodsonrealsnparrayanddeepsequencingdata AT luofei systematicevaluationofcopynumberalterationsdetectionmethodsonrealsnparrayanddeepsequencingdata |