Cargando…

A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data

BACKGROUND: The Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) are discovered to be tightly associated with cancers, so accurately detecting them is one of the most important tasks in the cancer genomics. A series of CNAs detection methods have been proposed and new ones are still being developed. Due to the comple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Luo, Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3266-7
_version_ 1783482679821336576
author Luo, Fei
author_facet Luo, Fei
author_sort Luo, Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) are discovered to be tightly associated with cancers, so accurately detecting them is one of the most important tasks in the cancer genomics. A series of CNAs detection methods have been proposed and new ones are still being developed. Due to the complexity of CNAs in cancers, no CNAs detection method has been accepted as the gold standard caller. Several evaluation works have made attempts to reveal typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. Limited by the scale of evaluation data, these different comparison works don’t reach a consensus and the researchers are still confused on how to choose one proper CNAs caller for their analysis. Therefore, it needs a more comprehensive evaluation of typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. RESULTS: In this work, we use a large-scale real dataset from CAGEKID consortium to evaluate total 12 typical CNAs detection methods. These methods are most widely used in cancer researches and always used as benchmark for the newly proposed CNAs detection methods. This large-scale dataset comprises of SNP array data on 94 samples and the whole genome sequencing data on 10 samples. Evaluations are comprehensively implemented in current scenarios of CNAs detection, which include that detect CNAs on SNP array data, on sequencing data with tumor and normal matched samples and on sequencing data with single tumor sample. Three SNP based methods are firstly ranked. Subsequently, the best SNP based method’s results are used as benchmark to compare six matched samples based methods and three single tumor sample based methods in terms of the preprocessing, recall rate, Jaccard index and segmentation characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey thoroughly reveals 12 typical methods’ superiority and inferiority. We explain why methods show specific characteristics from a methodological standpoint. Finally, we present the guiding principle for choosing one proper CNAs detection method under specific conditions. Some unsolved problems and expectations are also addressed for upcoming CNAs detection methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6929333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69293332019-12-30 A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data Luo, Fei BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: The Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) are discovered to be tightly associated with cancers, so accurately detecting them is one of the most important tasks in the cancer genomics. A series of CNAs detection methods have been proposed and new ones are still being developed. Due to the complexity of CNAs in cancers, no CNAs detection method has been accepted as the gold standard caller. Several evaluation works have made attempts to reveal typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. Limited by the scale of evaluation data, these different comparison works don’t reach a consensus and the researchers are still confused on how to choose one proper CNAs caller for their analysis. Therefore, it needs a more comprehensive evaluation of typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. RESULTS: In this work, we use a large-scale real dataset from CAGEKID consortium to evaluate total 12 typical CNAs detection methods. These methods are most widely used in cancer researches and always used as benchmark for the newly proposed CNAs detection methods. This large-scale dataset comprises of SNP array data on 94 samples and the whole genome sequencing data on 10 samples. Evaluations are comprehensively implemented in current scenarios of CNAs detection, which include that detect CNAs on SNP array data, on sequencing data with tumor and normal matched samples and on sequencing data with single tumor sample. Three SNP based methods are firstly ranked. Subsequently, the best SNP based method’s results are used as benchmark to compare six matched samples based methods and three single tumor sample based methods in terms of the preprocessing, recall rate, Jaccard index and segmentation characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey thoroughly reveals 12 typical methods’ superiority and inferiority. We explain why methods show specific characteristics from a methodological standpoint. Finally, we present the guiding principle for choosing one proper CNAs detection method under specific conditions. Some unsolved problems and expectations are also addressed for upcoming CNAs detection methods. BioMed Central 2019-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6929333/ /pubmed/31874603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3266-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Luo, Fei
A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data
title A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data
title_full A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data
title_fullStr A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data
title_full_unstemmed A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data
title_short A systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real SNP array and deep sequencing data
title_sort systematic evaluation of copy number alterations detection methods on real snp array and deep sequencing data
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3266-7
work_keys_str_mv AT luofei asystematicevaluationofcopynumberalterationsdetectionmethodsonrealsnparrayanddeepsequencingdata
AT luofei systematicevaluationofcopynumberalterationsdetectionmethodsonrealsnparrayanddeepsequencingdata