Cargando…
Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design
BACKGROUND: In the Dutch breast cancer screening program, women recalled with a BI-RADS 0 score are referred for additional imaging, while those with BI-RADS 4/5 scores are also directed to an outpatient breast clinic. Approximately six out of ten women are recalled without being diagnosed with a ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31870414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3867-5 |
_version_ | 1783482700586287104 |
---|---|
author | Neeter, L. M. F. H. Houben, I. P. L. Nelemans, P. J. Van Nijnatten, T. J. A. Pijnappel, R. M. Frotscher, C. Osinga-de Jong, M. Sanders, F. Van Dalen, T. Raat, H. P. J. Essers, B. A. B. Wildberger, J. E. Smidt, M. L. Lobbes, M. B. I. |
author_facet | Neeter, L. M. F. H. Houben, I. P. L. Nelemans, P. J. Van Nijnatten, T. J. A. Pijnappel, R. M. Frotscher, C. Osinga-de Jong, M. Sanders, F. Van Dalen, T. Raat, H. P. J. Essers, B. A. B. Wildberger, J. E. Smidt, M. L. Lobbes, M. B. I. |
author_sort | Neeter, L. M. F. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the Dutch breast cancer screening program, women recalled with a BI-RADS 0 score are referred for additional imaging, while those with BI-RADS 4/5 scores are also directed to an outpatient breast clinic. Approximately six out of ten women are recalled without being diagnosed with a malignancy. However, these recalls require additional imaging and doctor visits, which result in patient anxiety and increased health care costs. Conventional types of imaging used for additional imaging are full-field digital mammography and tomosynthesis. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography has proved to have higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging in women recalled from screening. Therefore, the aim is to study if CESM instead of conventional imaging is a more accurate, patient-friendly, and cost-effective strategy in the work-up of women recalled from breast cancer screening. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial will be conducted at four centers and will include 528 patients recalled for suspicious breast lesions from the Dutch breast cancer screening program. Participants are randomized in two groups: (1) standard care using conventional breast imaging techniques as initial imaging after recall versus (2) work-up primarily based on CESM. Written informed consent will be collected prior to study inclusion. The primary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy for detection of breast cancer. Secondary outcomes are numbers of additional diagnostic exams, days until final diagnosis, health care costs, and experienced patient anxiety. DISCUSSION: Based on previously published retrospective studies, we expect to demonstrate in this prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial, that using CESM as a primary work-up tool in women recalled from breast cancer screening is a more accurate, cost-effective, and patient-friendly strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL6413/NTR6589. Registered on 6 July, 2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6929439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69294392019-12-30 Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design Neeter, L. M. F. H. Houben, I. P. L. Nelemans, P. J. Van Nijnatten, T. J. A. Pijnappel, R. M. Frotscher, C. Osinga-de Jong, M. Sanders, F. Van Dalen, T. Raat, H. P. J. Essers, B. A. B. Wildberger, J. E. Smidt, M. L. Lobbes, M. B. I. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the Dutch breast cancer screening program, women recalled with a BI-RADS 0 score are referred for additional imaging, while those with BI-RADS 4/5 scores are also directed to an outpatient breast clinic. Approximately six out of ten women are recalled without being diagnosed with a malignancy. However, these recalls require additional imaging and doctor visits, which result in patient anxiety and increased health care costs. Conventional types of imaging used for additional imaging are full-field digital mammography and tomosynthesis. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography has proved to have higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging in women recalled from screening. Therefore, the aim is to study if CESM instead of conventional imaging is a more accurate, patient-friendly, and cost-effective strategy in the work-up of women recalled from breast cancer screening. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial will be conducted at four centers and will include 528 patients recalled for suspicious breast lesions from the Dutch breast cancer screening program. Participants are randomized in two groups: (1) standard care using conventional breast imaging techniques as initial imaging after recall versus (2) work-up primarily based on CESM. Written informed consent will be collected prior to study inclusion. The primary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy for detection of breast cancer. Secondary outcomes are numbers of additional diagnostic exams, days until final diagnosis, health care costs, and experienced patient anxiety. DISCUSSION: Based on previously published retrospective studies, we expect to demonstrate in this prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial, that using CESM as a primary work-up tool in women recalled from breast cancer screening is a more accurate, cost-effective, and patient-friendly strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL6413/NTR6589. Registered on 6 July, 2017. BioMed Central 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6929439/ /pubmed/31870414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3867-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Neeter, L. M. F. H. Houben, I. P. L. Nelemans, P. J. Van Nijnatten, T. J. A. Pijnappel, R. M. Frotscher, C. Osinga-de Jong, M. Sanders, F. Van Dalen, T. Raat, H. P. J. Essers, B. A. B. Wildberger, J. E. Smidt, M. L. Lobbes, M. B. I. Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design |
title | Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design |
title_full | Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design |
title_fullStr | Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design |
title_short | Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design |
title_sort | rapid access to contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the racer trial study design |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31870414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3867-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neeterlmfh rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT houbenipl rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT nelemanspj rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT vannijnattentja rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT pijnappelrm rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT frotscherc rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT osingadejongm rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT sandersf rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT vandalent rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT raathpj rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT essersbab rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT wildbergerje rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT smidtml rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign AT lobbesmbi rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign |