Cargando…

Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design

BACKGROUND: In the Dutch breast cancer screening program, women recalled with a BI-RADS 0 score are referred for additional imaging, while those with BI-RADS 4/5 scores are also directed to an outpatient breast clinic. Approximately six out of ten women are recalled without being diagnosed with a ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neeter, L. M. F. H., Houben, I. P. L., Nelemans, P. J., Van Nijnatten, T. J. A., Pijnappel, R. M., Frotscher, C., Osinga-de Jong, M., Sanders, F., Van Dalen, T., Raat, H. P. J., Essers, B. A. B., Wildberger, J. E., Smidt, M. L., Lobbes, M. B. I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31870414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3867-5
_version_ 1783482700586287104
author Neeter, L. M. F. H.
Houben, I. P. L.
Nelemans, P. J.
Van Nijnatten, T. J. A.
Pijnappel, R. M.
Frotscher, C.
Osinga-de Jong, M.
Sanders, F.
Van Dalen, T.
Raat, H. P. J.
Essers, B. A. B.
Wildberger, J. E.
Smidt, M. L.
Lobbes, M. B. I.
author_facet Neeter, L. M. F. H.
Houben, I. P. L.
Nelemans, P. J.
Van Nijnatten, T. J. A.
Pijnappel, R. M.
Frotscher, C.
Osinga-de Jong, M.
Sanders, F.
Van Dalen, T.
Raat, H. P. J.
Essers, B. A. B.
Wildberger, J. E.
Smidt, M. L.
Lobbes, M. B. I.
author_sort Neeter, L. M. F. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the Dutch breast cancer screening program, women recalled with a BI-RADS 0 score are referred for additional imaging, while those with BI-RADS 4/5 scores are also directed to an outpatient breast clinic. Approximately six out of ten women are recalled without being diagnosed with a malignancy. However, these recalls require additional imaging and doctor visits, which result in patient anxiety and increased health care costs. Conventional types of imaging used for additional imaging are full-field digital mammography and tomosynthesis. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography has proved to have higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging in women recalled from screening. Therefore, the aim is to study if CESM instead of conventional imaging is a more accurate, patient-friendly, and cost-effective strategy in the work-up of women recalled from breast cancer screening. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial will be conducted at four centers and will include 528 patients recalled for suspicious breast lesions from the Dutch breast cancer screening program. Participants are randomized in two groups: (1) standard care using conventional breast imaging techniques as initial imaging after recall versus (2) work-up primarily based on CESM. Written informed consent will be collected prior to study inclusion. The primary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy for detection of breast cancer. Secondary outcomes are numbers of additional diagnostic exams, days until final diagnosis, health care costs, and experienced patient anxiety. DISCUSSION: Based on previously published retrospective studies, we expect to demonstrate in this prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial, that using CESM as a primary work-up tool in women recalled from breast cancer screening is a more accurate, cost-effective, and patient-friendly strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL6413/NTR6589. Registered on 6 July, 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6929439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69294392019-12-30 Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design Neeter, L. M. F. H. Houben, I. P. L. Nelemans, P. J. Van Nijnatten, T. J. A. Pijnappel, R. M. Frotscher, C. Osinga-de Jong, M. Sanders, F. Van Dalen, T. Raat, H. P. J. Essers, B. A. B. Wildberger, J. E. Smidt, M. L. Lobbes, M. B. I. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the Dutch breast cancer screening program, women recalled with a BI-RADS 0 score are referred for additional imaging, while those with BI-RADS 4/5 scores are also directed to an outpatient breast clinic. Approximately six out of ten women are recalled without being diagnosed with a malignancy. However, these recalls require additional imaging and doctor visits, which result in patient anxiety and increased health care costs. Conventional types of imaging used for additional imaging are full-field digital mammography and tomosynthesis. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography has proved to have higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging in women recalled from screening. Therefore, the aim is to study if CESM instead of conventional imaging is a more accurate, patient-friendly, and cost-effective strategy in the work-up of women recalled from breast cancer screening. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial will be conducted at four centers and will include 528 patients recalled for suspicious breast lesions from the Dutch breast cancer screening program. Participants are randomized in two groups: (1) standard care using conventional breast imaging techniques as initial imaging after recall versus (2) work-up primarily based on CESM. Written informed consent will be collected prior to study inclusion. The primary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy for detection of breast cancer. Secondary outcomes are numbers of additional diagnostic exams, days until final diagnosis, health care costs, and experienced patient anxiety. DISCUSSION: Based on previously published retrospective studies, we expect to demonstrate in this prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial, that using CESM as a primary work-up tool in women recalled from breast cancer screening is a more accurate, cost-effective, and patient-friendly strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL6413/NTR6589. Registered on 6 July, 2017. BioMed Central 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6929439/ /pubmed/31870414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3867-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Neeter, L. M. F. H.
Houben, I. P. L.
Nelemans, P. J.
Van Nijnatten, T. J. A.
Pijnappel, R. M.
Frotscher, C.
Osinga-de Jong, M.
Sanders, F.
Van Dalen, T.
Raat, H. P. J.
Essers, B. A. B.
Wildberger, J. E.
Smidt, M. L.
Lobbes, M. B. I.
Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design
title Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design
title_full Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design
title_fullStr Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design
title_short Rapid Access to Contrast-Enhanced spectral mammogRaphy in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the RACER trial study design
title_sort rapid access to contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in women recalled from breast cancer screening: the racer trial study design
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31870414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3867-5
work_keys_str_mv AT neeterlmfh rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT houbenipl rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT nelemanspj rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT vannijnattentja rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT pijnappelrm rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT frotscherc rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT osingadejongm rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT sandersf rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT vandalent rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT raathpj rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT essersbab rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT wildbergerje rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT smidtml rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign
AT lobbesmbi rapidaccesstocontrastenhancedspectralmammographyinwomenrecalledfrombreastcancerscreeningtheracertrialstudydesign