Cargando…

The Leukocyte VCS Parameters Compared with Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Hemoglobin Scavenger Receptor sCD163 for Prediction of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver cirrhosis have a high risk of sepsis and a poor prognosis. Recently, a new standard for sepsis (Sepsis-3) has been proposed in the general population. The Coulter Lh 750 hematology analyzer can evaluate mean volume, conductivity, scatter, and distribution width of leu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Fan, Feng, Yang-chun, Zhao, Gang, Wu, Hui-li, Xu, Ling, Zhao, Jing, Lv, Jie, Han, Song-tao, Huang, Yan-chun, Ma, Xiu-min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1369798
_version_ 1783482879145148416
author Guo, Fan
Feng, Yang-chun
Zhao, Gang
Wu, Hui-li
Xu, Ling
Zhao, Jing
Lv, Jie
Han, Song-tao
Huang, Yan-chun
Ma, Xiu-min
author_facet Guo, Fan
Feng, Yang-chun
Zhao, Gang
Wu, Hui-li
Xu, Ling
Zhao, Jing
Lv, Jie
Han, Song-tao
Huang, Yan-chun
Ma, Xiu-min
author_sort Guo, Fan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with liver cirrhosis have a high risk of sepsis and a poor prognosis. Recently, a new standard for sepsis (Sepsis-3) has been proposed in the general population. The Coulter Lh 750 hematology analyzer can evaluate mean volume, conductivity, scatter, and distribution width of leukocyte. We tried to use Sepsis-3 criteria to study the diagnostic value of volume, conductivity, and scattering (VCS) parameters in sepsis and infection in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with traditional infection markers (PCT, IL-6, sCDl63). METHODS: A blinded, cohort study was conducted in three different ED populations within three affiliated hospitals. A total of 249 patients with liver cirrhosis were enrolled in the study. According to the “Sepsis-3” consensus criteria, clinical history, and laboratory examination, the subjects were divided into sepsis (n = 54), patients with infections (n = 95), and patients without systemic infections (n = 100). The blood samples of the patients were collected at the time of ED admission and were evaluated for the detection of sepsis. RESULTS: The differences of MNV, MNS, MMV, MMS, MLV, NDW, and MDW in the three groups were statistically significant. In the diagnosis of sepsis in patients with liver cirrhosis, the sensitivity of combined detection of MMV and MDW was 88.89%; the specificity was 74%. This sensitivity was significantly better than the 83.3% achieved using 0.97 mg/L as the cutoff for sCD163. In the diagnosis of infection in cirrhosis, the sensitivity of combination of MNV and MMS was increased to 86.32%; the specificity was 92%. The sensitivity was the same as that achieved by using 0.31 ng/mL as the cutoff value of PCT, but the specificity increased. CONCLUSION: The leukocyte VCS parameter could be potential parameters for indicating sepsis and infection in patients with liver cirrhosis. The combined detection of MMV and MDW seemed to be helpful for the diagnosis of sepsis in these patients, and the combination of MNV and MMS could better indicate infection for them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6930384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69303842020-01-08 The Leukocyte VCS Parameters Compared with Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Hemoglobin Scavenger Receptor sCD163 for Prediction of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis Guo, Fan Feng, Yang-chun Zhao, Gang Wu, Hui-li Xu, Ling Zhao, Jing Lv, Jie Han, Song-tao Huang, Yan-chun Ma, Xiu-min Dis Markers Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with liver cirrhosis have a high risk of sepsis and a poor prognosis. Recently, a new standard for sepsis (Sepsis-3) has been proposed in the general population. The Coulter Lh 750 hematology analyzer can evaluate mean volume, conductivity, scatter, and distribution width of leukocyte. We tried to use Sepsis-3 criteria to study the diagnostic value of volume, conductivity, and scattering (VCS) parameters in sepsis and infection in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with traditional infection markers (PCT, IL-6, sCDl63). METHODS: A blinded, cohort study was conducted in three different ED populations within three affiliated hospitals. A total of 249 patients with liver cirrhosis were enrolled in the study. According to the “Sepsis-3” consensus criteria, clinical history, and laboratory examination, the subjects were divided into sepsis (n = 54), patients with infections (n = 95), and patients without systemic infections (n = 100). The blood samples of the patients were collected at the time of ED admission and were evaluated for the detection of sepsis. RESULTS: The differences of MNV, MNS, MMV, MMS, MLV, NDW, and MDW in the three groups were statistically significant. In the diagnosis of sepsis in patients with liver cirrhosis, the sensitivity of combined detection of MMV and MDW was 88.89%; the specificity was 74%. This sensitivity was significantly better than the 83.3% achieved using 0.97 mg/L as the cutoff for sCD163. In the diagnosis of infection in cirrhosis, the sensitivity of combination of MNV and MMS was increased to 86.32%; the specificity was 92%. The sensitivity was the same as that achieved by using 0.31 ng/mL as the cutoff value of PCT, but the specificity increased. CONCLUSION: The leukocyte VCS parameter could be potential parameters for indicating sepsis and infection in patients with liver cirrhosis. The combined detection of MMV and MDW seemed to be helpful for the diagnosis of sepsis in these patients, and the combination of MNV and MMS could better indicate infection for them. Hindawi 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6930384/ /pubmed/31915467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1369798 Text en Copyright © 2019 Fan Guo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guo, Fan
Feng, Yang-chun
Zhao, Gang
Wu, Hui-li
Xu, Ling
Zhao, Jing
Lv, Jie
Han, Song-tao
Huang, Yan-chun
Ma, Xiu-min
The Leukocyte VCS Parameters Compared with Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Hemoglobin Scavenger Receptor sCD163 for Prediction of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis
title The Leukocyte VCS Parameters Compared with Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Hemoglobin Scavenger Receptor sCD163 for Prediction of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis
title_full The Leukocyte VCS Parameters Compared with Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Hemoglobin Scavenger Receptor sCD163 for Prediction of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis
title_fullStr The Leukocyte VCS Parameters Compared with Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Hemoglobin Scavenger Receptor sCD163 for Prediction of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis
title_full_unstemmed The Leukocyte VCS Parameters Compared with Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Hemoglobin Scavenger Receptor sCD163 for Prediction of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis
title_short The Leukocyte VCS Parameters Compared with Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Hemoglobin Scavenger Receptor sCD163 for Prediction of Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis
title_sort leukocyte vcs parameters compared with procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and soluble hemoglobin scavenger receptor scd163 for prediction of sepsis in patients with cirrhosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1369798
work_keys_str_mv AT guofan theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT fengyangchun theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT zhaogang theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT wuhuili theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT xuling theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT zhaojing theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT lvjie theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT hansongtao theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT huangyanchun theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT maxiumin theleukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT guofan leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT fengyangchun leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT zhaogang leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT wuhuili leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT xuling leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT zhaojing leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT lvjie leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT hansongtao leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT huangyanchun leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis
AT maxiumin leukocytevcsparameterscomparedwithprocalcitonininterleukin6andsolublehemoglobinscavengerreceptorscd163forpredictionofsepsisinpatientswithcirrhosis