Cargando…

Development and validation of a new score for predicting functional outcome of neurocritically ill patients: The INCNS score

AIMS: To develop and validate a novel score for prediction of 3‐month functional outcome in neurocritically ill patients. METHODS: The development of the novel score was based on two widely used scores for general critical illnesses (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, APACHE II; Simp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Qiong, Yuan, Fang, Yang, Xi‐Ai, Zhu, Ji‐Wen, Song, Lu, Bi, Li‐Jie, Jiao, Ze‐Yu, Kang, Xiao‐Gang, Yang, Fang, Jiang, Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.13134
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: To develop and validate a novel score for prediction of 3‐month functional outcome in neurocritically ill patients. METHODS: The development of the novel score was based on two widely used scores for general critical illnesses (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, APACHE II; Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, SAPS II) and consideration of the characteristics of neurocritical illness. Data from consecutive patients admitted to neurological ICU (N‐ICU) between January 2013 and June 2016 were used for the validation. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate 3‐month functional outcomes. APACHE II scores, SAPS II scores, and our novel scores at 24 hours and 72 hours in N‐ICU were obtained. We compared the prognostic performance of our score with APACHE II and SAPS II. RESULTS: We developed a 44‐point scoring system named the INCNS score, and it includes 19 items which were categorized into five parts: inflammation (I), nutrition (N), consciousness (C), neurological function (N), and systemic function (S). We validated the INCNS score with a cohort of 941 N‐ICU patients. The 72‐hours INCNS score achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.828 (95% CI: 0.802‐0.854), and the 24‐hours INCNS score achieved an AUC of 0.788 (95% CI: 0.759‐0.817). The INCNS score exhibited significantly better discriminative and prognostic performance than APACHE II and SAPS II at both 24 hours and 72 hours in N‐ICU. CONCLUSION: We developed an INCNS score with superior predictive power for functional outcome of neurocritically ill patients.