Cargando…
Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer
BACKGROUND: The management of proximal esophageal cancer differs from that of tumors located in the mid and lower part of the esophagus due to the close vicinity of vital structures. Non-surgical treatment options like radiotherapy and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) have been implemented. The trend...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i47.6835 |
_version_ | 1783483016230731776 |
---|---|
author | de Vos-Geelen, Judith Geurts, Sandra ME van Putten, Margreet Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ Grabsch, Heike I Haj Mohammad, Nadia Hoebers, Frank JP Hoge, Chantal V Jeene, Paul M de Jong, Evelien JM van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM Rozema, Tom Slingerland, Marije Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Lemmens, Valery EPP |
author_facet | de Vos-Geelen, Judith Geurts, Sandra ME van Putten, Margreet Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ Grabsch, Heike I Haj Mohammad, Nadia Hoebers, Frank JP Hoge, Chantal V Jeene, Paul M de Jong, Evelien JM van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM Rozema, Tom Slingerland, Marije Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Lemmens, Valery EPP |
author_sort | de Vos-Geelen, Judith |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The management of proximal esophageal cancer differs from that of tumors located in the mid and lower part of the esophagus due to the close vicinity of vital structures. Non-surgical treatment options like radiotherapy and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) have been implemented. The trends in (non-)surgical treatment and its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with proximal esophageal cancer are unclear, related to its rare disease status. To optimize treatment strategies and counseling of patients with proximal esophageal cancer, it is therefore essential to gain more insight through real-life studies. AIM: To establish trends in treatment and OS in patients with proximal esophageal cancer. METHODS: In this population-based study, patients with proximal esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 2014 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The proximal esophagus consists of the cervical esophagus and the upper thoracic section, extending to 24 cm from the incisors. Trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, and OS were assessed. Analyses were stratified by presence of distant metastasis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses was performed to assess the effect of period of diagnosis on OS, adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 2783 patients were included. Over the study period, the use of radiotherapy, resection, and CRT in non-metastatic disease changed from 53%, 23%, and 1% in 1989-1994 to 21%, 9%, and 49% in 2010-2014, respectively. In metastatic disease, the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased over time. Median OS of the total population increased from 7.3 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-8.1] in 1989-1994 to 9.5 mo (95%CI: 8.1-10.8) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). In non-metastatic disease, 5-year OS rates improved from 5% (95%CI: 3%-7%) in 1989-1994 to 13% (95%CI: 9%-17%) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated a significant treatment effect over time on survival. In metastatic disease, median OS was 3.8 mo (95%CI: 2.5-5.1) in 1989-1994, and 5.1 mo (95%CI: 4.3-5.9) in 2010-2014 (logrank P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: OS significantly improved in non-metastatic proximal esophageal cancer, likely to be associated with an increased use of CRT. Patterns in metastatic disease did not change significantly over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6931002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69310022019-12-27 Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer de Vos-Geelen, Judith Geurts, Sandra ME van Putten, Margreet Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ Grabsch, Heike I Haj Mohammad, Nadia Hoebers, Frank JP Hoge, Chantal V Jeene, Paul M de Jong, Evelien JM van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM Rozema, Tom Slingerland, Marije Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Lemmens, Valery EPP World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: The management of proximal esophageal cancer differs from that of tumors located in the mid and lower part of the esophagus due to the close vicinity of vital structures. Non-surgical treatment options like radiotherapy and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) have been implemented. The trends in (non-)surgical treatment and its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with proximal esophageal cancer are unclear, related to its rare disease status. To optimize treatment strategies and counseling of patients with proximal esophageal cancer, it is therefore essential to gain more insight through real-life studies. AIM: To establish trends in treatment and OS in patients with proximal esophageal cancer. METHODS: In this population-based study, patients with proximal esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 2014 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The proximal esophagus consists of the cervical esophagus and the upper thoracic section, extending to 24 cm from the incisors. Trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, and OS were assessed. Analyses were stratified by presence of distant metastasis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses was performed to assess the effect of period of diagnosis on OS, adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 2783 patients were included. Over the study period, the use of radiotherapy, resection, and CRT in non-metastatic disease changed from 53%, 23%, and 1% in 1989-1994 to 21%, 9%, and 49% in 2010-2014, respectively. In metastatic disease, the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased over time. Median OS of the total population increased from 7.3 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-8.1] in 1989-1994 to 9.5 mo (95%CI: 8.1-10.8) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). In non-metastatic disease, 5-year OS rates improved from 5% (95%CI: 3%-7%) in 1989-1994 to 13% (95%CI: 9%-17%) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated a significant treatment effect over time on survival. In metastatic disease, median OS was 3.8 mo (95%CI: 2.5-5.1) in 1989-1994, and 5.1 mo (95%CI: 4.3-5.9) in 2010-2014 (logrank P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: OS significantly improved in non-metastatic proximal esophageal cancer, likely to be associated with an increased use of CRT. Patterns in metastatic disease did not change significantly over time. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-12-21 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6931002/ /pubmed/31885424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i47.6835 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Cohort Study de Vos-Geelen, Judith Geurts, Sandra ME van Putten, Margreet Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ Grabsch, Heike I Haj Mohammad, Nadia Hoebers, Frank JP Hoge, Chantal V Jeene, Paul M de Jong, Evelien JM van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM Rozema, Tom Slingerland, Marije Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Lemmens, Valery EPP Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer |
title | Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer |
title_full | Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer |
title_fullStr | Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer |
title_short | Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer |
title_sort | trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer |
topic | Retrospective Cohort Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i47.6835 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devosgeelenjudith trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT geurtssandrame trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT vanputtenmargreet trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT valkenburgvanierselliselotbj trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT grabschheikei trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT hajmohammadnadia trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT hoebersfrankjp trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT hogechantalv trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT jeenepaulm trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT dejongevelienjm trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT rozematom trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT slingerlandmarije trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT tjanheijnenviviannecg trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT nieuwenhuijzengrardap trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer AT lemmensvaleryepp trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer |