Cargando…

Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND: The management of proximal esophageal cancer differs from that of tumors located in the mid and lower part of the esophagus due to the close vicinity of vital structures. Non-surgical treatment options like radiotherapy and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) have been implemented. The trend...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Vos-Geelen, Judith, Geurts, Sandra ME, van Putten, Margreet, Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ, Grabsch, Heike I, Haj Mohammad, Nadia, Hoebers, Frank JP, Hoge, Chantal V, Jeene, Paul M, de Jong, Evelien JM, van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM, Rozema, Tom, Slingerland, Marije, Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG, Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP, Lemmens, Valery EPP
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885424
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i47.6835
_version_ 1783483016230731776
author de Vos-Geelen, Judith
Geurts, Sandra ME
van Putten, Margreet
Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ
Grabsch, Heike I
Haj Mohammad, Nadia
Hoebers, Frank JP
Hoge, Chantal V
Jeene, Paul M
de Jong, Evelien JM
van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM
Rozema, Tom
Slingerland, Marije
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP
Lemmens, Valery EPP
author_facet de Vos-Geelen, Judith
Geurts, Sandra ME
van Putten, Margreet
Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ
Grabsch, Heike I
Haj Mohammad, Nadia
Hoebers, Frank JP
Hoge, Chantal V
Jeene, Paul M
de Jong, Evelien JM
van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM
Rozema, Tom
Slingerland, Marije
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP
Lemmens, Valery EPP
author_sort de Vos-Geelen, Judith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The management of proximal esophageal cancer differs from that of tumors located in the mid and lower part of the esophagus due to the close vicinity of vital structures. Non-surgical treatment options like radiotherapy and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) have been implemented. The trends in (non-)surgical treatment and its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with proximal esophageal cancer are unclear, related to its rare disease status. To optimize treatment strategies and counseling of patients with proximal esophageal cancer, it is therefore essential to gain more insight through real-life studies. AIM: To establish trends in treatment and OS in patients with proximal esophageal cancer. METHODS: In this population-based study, patients with proximal esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 2014 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The proximal esophagus consists of the cervical esophagus and the upper thoracic section, extending to 24 cm from the incisors. Trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, and OS were assessed. Analyses were stratified by presence of distant metastasis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses was performed to assess the effect of period of diagnosis on OS, adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 2783 patients were included. Over the study period, the use of radiotherapy, resection, and CRT in non-metastatic disease changed from 53%, 23%, and 1% in 1989-1994 to 21%, 9%, and 49% in 2010-2014, respectively. In metastatic disease, the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased over time. Median OS of the total population increased from 7.3 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-8.1] in 1989-1994 to 9.5 mo (95%CI: 8.1-10.8) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). In non-metastatic disease, 5-year OS rates improved from 5% (95%CI: 3%-7%) in 1989-1994 to 13% (95%CI: 9%-17%) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated a significant treatment effect over time on survival. In metastatic disease, median OS was 3.8 mo (95%CI: 2.5-5.1) in 1989-1994, and 5.1 mo (95%CI: 4.3-5.9) in 2010-2014 (logrank P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: OS significantly improved in non-metastatic proximal esophageal cancer, likely to be associated with an increased use of CRT. Patterns in metastatic disease did not change significantly over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6931002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69310022019-12-27 Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer de Vos-Geelen, Judith Geurts, Sandra ME van Putten, Margreet Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ Grabsch, Heike I Haj Mohammad, Nadia Hoebers, Frank JP Hoge, Chantal V Jeene, Paul M de Jong, Evelien JM van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM Rozema, Tom Slingerland, Marije Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Lemmens, Valery EPP World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: The management of proximal esophageal cancer differs from that of tumors located in the mid and lower part of the esophagus due to the close vicinity of vital structures. Non-surgical treatment options like radiotherapy and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) have been implemented. The trends in (non-)surgical treatment and its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with proximal esophageal cancer are unclear, related to its rare disease status. To optimize treatment strategies and counseling of patients with proximal esophageal cancer, it is therefore essential to gain more insight through real-life studies. AIM: To establish trends in treatment and OS in patients with proximal esophageal cancer. METHODS: In this population-based study, patients with proximal esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 2014 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The proximal esophagus consists of the cervical esophagus and the upper thoracic section, extending to 24 cm from the incisors. Trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, and OS were assessed. Analyses were stratified by presence of distant metastasis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses was performed to assess the effect of period of diagnosis on OS, adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 2783 patients were included. Over the study period, the use of radiotherapy, resection, and CRT in non-metastatic disease changed from 53%, 23%, and 1% in 1989-1994 to 21%, 9%, and 49% in 2010-2014, respectively. In metastatic disease, the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased over time. Median OS of the total population increased from 7.3 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-8.1] in 1989-1994 to 9.5 mo (95%CI: 8.1-10.8) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). In non-metastatic disease, 5-year OS rates improved from 5% (95%CI: 3%-7%) in 1989-1994 to 13% (95%CI: 9%-17%) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated a significant treatment effect over time on survival. In metastatic disease, median OS was 3.8 mo (95%CI: 2.5-5.1) in 1989-1994, and 5.1 mo (95%CI: 4.3-5.9) in 2010-2014 (logrank P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: OS significantly improved in non-metastatic proximal esophageal cancer, likely to be associated with an increased use of CRT. Patterns in metastatic disease did not change significantly over time. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-12-21 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6931002/ /pubmed/31885424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i47.6835 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
de Vos-Geelen, Judith
Geurts, Sandra ME
van Putten, Margreet
Valkenburg-van Iersel, Liselot BJ
Grabsch, Heike I
Haj Mohammad, Nadia
Hoebers, Frank JP
Hoge, Chantal V
Jeene, Paul M
de Jong, Evelien JM
van Laarhoven, Hanneke WM
Rozema, Tom
Slingerland, Marije
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP
Lemmens, Valery EPP
Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer
title Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer
title_full Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer
title_fullStr Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer
title_short Trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer
title_sort trends in treatment and overall survival among patients with proximal esophageal cancer
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885424
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i47.6835
work_keys_str_mv AT devosgeelenjudith trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT geurtssandrame trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT vanputtenmargreet trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT valkenburgvanierselliselotbj trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT grabschheikei trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT hajmohammadnadia trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT hoebersfrankjp trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT hogechantalv trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT jeenepaulm trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT dejongevelienjm trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT rozematom trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT slingerlandmarije trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT tjanheijnenviviannecg trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT nieuwenhuijzengrardap trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer
AT lemmensvaleryepp trendsintreatmentandoverallsurvivalamongpatientswithproximalesophagealcancer