Cargando…

Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits

PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relative benefits of posterior fixation combined with vertebroplasty (PFVP) or vertebral column resection (PVCR) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with intravertebral cleft (IVC) complicated by neurological deficits. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Hongyu, Dong, Chunke, Zhu, Yuting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4126818
_version_ 1783483020088442880
author Wei, Hongyu
Dong, Chunke
Zhu, Yuting
author_facet Wei, Hongyu
Dong, Chunke
Zhu, Yuting
author_sort Wei, Hongyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relative benefits of posterior fixation combined with vertebroplasty (PFVP) or vertebral column resection (PVCR) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with intravertebral cleft (IVC) complicated by neurological deficits. METHODS: From June 2010 to January 2015, 45 consecutive patients suffering OVCFs with IVC and spinal cord injuries were treated with PFVP or PVCR in our department. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior vertebral height (AVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), local kyphotic angle (LKA), and neurologic function were evaluated and compared, and the operative duration, blood loss, and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: They all achieved excellent pain relief, vertebral height recovery, and kyphosis correction one month after surgery, and no significant differences existed between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the 1-month postoperative and final follow-up VAS, AVH, and LKA values in the PVCR group (P > 0.05), while AVH and LKA worsened in the PFVP group at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). Similarly, the initial improvements in VAS scores decreased over time (P < 0.05). Neurologic function improved in both groups, and no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups either preoperatively or postoperatively (P > 0.05). The blood loss and operative duration were significantly lower in the PFVP group than those in the PVCR group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with PVCR, PFVP had equivalent short-term clinical outcomes with less blood loss and operative duration which can be very beneficial for treating elderly patients with extreme comorbidities in this condition. However, based on the long-term efficacy of pain relief, vertebral height maintenance, and deformity correction, PVCR is a more reasonable choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6931022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69310222020-01-08 Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits Wei, Hongyu Dong, Chunke Zhu, Yuting Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relative benefits of posterior fixation combined with vertebroplasty (PFVP) or vertebral column resection (PVCR) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with intravertebral cleft (IVC) complicated by neurological deficits. METHODS: From June 2010 to January 2015, 45 consecutive patients suffering OVCFs with IVC and spinal cord injuries were treated with PFVP or PVCR in our department. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior vertebral height (AVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), local kyphotic angle (LKA), and neurologic function were evaluated and compared, and the operative duration, blood loss, and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: They all achieved excellent pain relief, vertebral height recovery, and kyphosis correction one month after surgery, and no significant differences existed between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the 1-month postoperative and final follow-up VAS, AVH, and LKA values in the PVCR group (P > 0.05), while AVH and LKA worsened in the PFVP group at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). Similarly, the initial improvements in VAS scores decreased over time (P < 0.05). Neurologic function improved in both groups, and no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups either preoperatively or postoperatively (P > 0.05). The blood loss and operative duration were significantly lower in the PFVP group than those in the PVCR group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with PVCR, PFVP had equivalent short-term clinical outcomes with less blood loss and operative duration which can be very beneficial for treating elderly patients with extreme comorbidities in this condition. However, based on the long-term efficacy of pain relief, vertebral height maintenance, and deformity correction, PVCR is a more reasonable choice. Hindawi 2019-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6931022/ /pubmed/31915692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4126818 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hongyu Wei et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wei, Hongyu
Dong, Chunke
Zhu, Yuting
Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits
title Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits
title_full Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits
title_fullStr Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits
title_full_unstemmed Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits
title_short Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits
title_sort posterior fixation combined with vertebroplasty or vertebral column resection for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral cleft complicated by neurological deficits
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4126818
work_keys_str_mv AT weihongyu posteriorfixationcombinedwithvertebroplastyorvertebralcolumnresectionforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractureswithintravertebralcleftcomplicatedbyneurologicaldeficits
AT dongchunke posteriorfixationcombinedwithvertebroplastyorvertebralcolumnresectionforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractureswithintravertebralcleftcomplicatedbyneurologicaldeficits
AT zhuyuting posteriorfixationcombinedwithvertebroplastyorvertebralcolumnresectionforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractureswithintravertebralcleftcomplicatedbyneurologicaldeficits