Cargando…

Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG

OBJECTIVES: Children pose challenges to obtain quality EEG data due to excessive artifact. Collodion is used in EEG electrodes due to its water resistance and strong adhesive qualities. This study was done to evaluate differences in artifacts between the collodion and paste method. METHODS: 115 subj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brigham, Danielle, Shah, Yash, Singh, Kanwaljit, Pavkovic, Ivan, Karkare, Shefali, Kothare, Sanjeev V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2019.11.002
_version_ 1783483032722735104
author Brigham, Danielle
Shah, Yash
Singh, Kanwaljit
Pavkovic, Ivan
Karkare, Shefali
Kothare, Sanjeev V.
author_facet Brigham, Danielle
Shah, Yash
Singh, Kanwaljit
Pavkovic, Ivan
Karkare, Shefali
Kothare, Sanjeev V.
author_sort Brigham, Danielle
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Children pose challenges to obtain quality EEG data due to excessive artifact. Collodion is used in EEG electrodes due to its water resistance and strong adhesive qualities. This study was done to evaluate differences in artifacts between the collodion and paste method. METHODS: 115 subjects (children age >3 years) were randomized into paste and collodion groups and artifacts evaluated at baseline and every hour over 30 s increments. Age, sleep state, and number of electrodes with artifact were also documented. T-test was performed to determine differences in the various parameters between the two groups. RESULTS: 61 subjects were in the paste group and 54 in the collodion group. Mean of total seconds of artifact from 0 to 24 h were 41.8 s in paste group versus 30.3 s in collodion group (P = 0.02). Children >11 years old had less artifact than younger children from 0 to 24 h (24.3 versus 41.2 s, P = 0.03), and from 24 to 48 h (33.1 versus 43.1 s, P = 0.03). There was a significant effect of sleep vs. awake state recordings on artifact from 0 to 24 h (30.3 versus 50.2 s, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Electrode problems are common with both collodion and paste in prolonged AEEG monitoring. However, for studies less than 24 h, collodion may be a better alternative. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study provides evidence that in some cases collodion may be a better alternative to paste in terms of decreased artifacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6931097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69310972019-12-30 Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG Brigham, Danielle Shah, Yash Singh, Kanwaljit Pavkovic, Ivan Karkare, Shefali Kothare, Sanjeev V. Clin Neurophysiol Pract Clinical and Research Article OBJECTIVES: Children pose challenges to obtain quality EEG data due to excessive artifact. Collodion is used in EEG electrodes due to its water resistance and strong adhesive qualities. This study was done to evaluate differences in artifacts between the collodion and paste method. METHODS: 115 subjects (children age >3 years) were randomized into paste and collodion groups and artifacts evaluated at baseline and every hour over 30 s increments. Age, sleep state, and number of electrodes with artifact were also documented. T-test was performed to determine differences in the various parameters between the two groups. RESULTS: 61 subjects were in the paste group and 54 in the collodion group. Mean of total seconds of artifact from 0 to 24 h were 41.8 s in paste group versus 30.3 s in collodion group (P = 0.02). Children >11 years old had less artifact than younger children from 0 to 24 h (24.3 versus 41.2 s, P = 0.03), and from 24 to 48 h (33.1 versus 43.1 s, P = 0.03). There was a significant effect of sleep vs. awake state recordings on artifact from 0 to 24 h (30.3 versus 50.2 s, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Electrode problems are common with both collodion and paste in prolonged AEEG monitoring. However, for studies less than 24 h, collodion may be a better alternative. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study provides evidence that in some cases collodion may be a better alternative to paste in terms of decreased artifacts. Elsevier 2019-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6931097/ /pubmed/31890993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2019.11.002 Text en © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical and Research Article
Brigham, Danielle
Shah, Yash
Singh, Kanwaljit
Pavkovic, Ivan
Karkare, Shefali
Kothare, Sanjeev V.
Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG
title Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG
title_full Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG
title_fullStr Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG
title_short Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG
title_sort comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric eeg
topic Clinical and Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2019.11.002
work_keys_str_mv AT brighamdanielle comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg
AT shahyash comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg
AT singhkanwaljit comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg
AT pavkovicivan comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg
AT karkareshefali comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg
AT kotharesanjeevv comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg