Cargando…
Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG
OBJECTIVES: Children pose challenges to obtain quality EEG data due to excessive artifact. Collodion is used in EEG electrodes due to its water resistance and strong adhesive qualities. This study was done to evaluate differences in artifacts between the collodion and paste method. METHODS: 115 subj...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2019.11.002 |
_version_ | 1783483032722735104 |
---|---|
author | Brigham, Danielle Shah, Yash Singh, Kanwaljit Pavkovic, Ivan Karkare, Shefali Kothare, Sanjeev V. |
author_facet | Brigham, Danielle Shah, Yash Singh, Kanwaljit Pavkovic, Ivan Karkare, Shefali Kothare, Sanjeev V. |
author_sort | Brigham, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Children pose challenges to obtain quality EEG data due to excessive artifact. Collodion is used in EEG electrodes due to its water resistance and strong adhesive qualities. This study was done to evaluate differences in artifacts between the collodion and paste method. METHODS: 115 subjects (children age >3 years) were randomized into paste and collodion groups and artifacts evaluated at baseline and every hour over 30 s increments. Age, sleep state, and number of electrodes with artifact were also documented. T-test was performed to determine differences in the various parameters between the two groups. RESULTS: 61 subjects were in the paste group and 54 in the collodion group. Mean of total seconds of artifact from 0 to 24 h were 41.8 s in paste group versus 30.3 s in collodion group (P = 0.02). Children >11 years old had less artifact than younger children from 0 to 24 h (24.3 versus 41.2 s, P = 0.03), and from 24 to 48 h (33.1 versus 43.1 s, P = 0.03). There was a significant effect of sleep vs. awake state recordings on artifact from 0 to 24 h (30.3 versus 50.2 s, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Electrode problems are common with both collodion and paste in prolonged AEEG monitoring. However, for studies less than 24 h, collodion may be a better alternative. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study provides evidence that in some cases collodion may be a better alternative to paste in terms of decreased artifacts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6931097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69310972019-12-30 Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG Brigham, Danielle Shah, Yash Singh, Kanwaljit Pavkovic, Ivan Karkare, Shefali Kothare, Sanjeev V. Clin Neurophysiol Pract Clinical and Research Article OBJECTIVES: Children pose challenges to obtain quality EEG data due to excessive artifact. Collodion is used in EEG electrodes due to its water resistance and strong adhesive qualities. This study was done to evaluate differences in artifacts between the collodion and paste method. METHODS: 115 subjects (children age >3 years) were randomized into paste and collodion groups and artifacts evaluated at baseline and every hour over 30 s increments. Age, sleep state, and number of electrodes with artifact were also documented. T-test was performed to determine differences in the various parameters between the two groups. RESULTS: 61 subjects were in the paste group and 54 in the collodion group. Mean of total seconds of artifact from 0 to 24 h were 41.8 s in paste group versus 30.3 s in collodion group (P = 0.02). Children >11 years old had less artifact than younger children from 0 to 24 h (24.3 versus 41.2 s, P = 0.03), and from 24 to 48 h (33.1 versus 43.1 s, P = 0.03). There was a significant effect of sleep vs. awake state recordings on artifact from 0 to 24 h (30.3 versus 50.2 s, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Electrode problems are common with both collodion and paste in prolonged AEEG monitoring. However, for studies less than 24 h, collodion may be a better alternative. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study provides evidence that in some cases collodion may be a better alternative to paste in terms of decreased artifacts. Elsevier 2019-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6931097/ /pubmed/31890993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2019.11.002 Text en © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Research Article Brigham, Danielle Shah, Yash Singh, Kanwaljit Pavkovic, Ivan Karkare, Shefali Kothare, Sanjeev V. Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG |
title | Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG |
title_full | Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG |
title_fullStr | Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG |
title_short | Comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric EEG |
title_sort | comparison of artifacts between paste and collodion method of electrode application in pediatric eeg |
topic | Clinical and Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2019.11.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brighamdanielle comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg AT shahyash comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg AT singhkanwaljit comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg AT pavkovicivan comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg AT karkareshefali comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg AT kotharesanjeevv comparisonofartifactsbetweenpasteandcollodionmethodofelectrodeapplicationinpediatriceeg |