Cargando…

Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord

Posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes are short-latency spinal reflexes evoked by epidural or transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in clinical and physiological studies. PRM reflexes share key physiological characteristics with the H reflex elicited by electrical stimulation of large-diameter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofstoetter, Ursula S., Freundl, Brigitta, Binder, Heinrich, Minassian, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6932776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227057
_version_ 1783483073451524096
author Hofstoetter, Ursula S.
Freundl, Brigitta
Binder, Heinrich
Minassian, Karen
author_facet Hofstoetter, Ursula S.
Freundl, Brigitta
Binder, Heinrich
Minassian, Karen
author_sort Hofstoetter, Ursula S.
collection PubMed
description Posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes are short-latency spinal reflexes evoked by epidural or transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in clinical and physiological studies. PRM reflexes share key physiological characteristics with the H reflex elicited by electrical stimulation of large-diameter muscle spindle afferents in the tibial nerve. Here, we compared the H reflex and the PRM reflex of soleus in response to transcutaneous stimulation by studying their recovery cycles in ten neurologically intact volunteers and ten individuals with traumatic, chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The recovery cycles of the reflexes, i.e., the time course of their excitability changes, were assessed by paired pulses with conditioning-test intervals of 20–5000 ms. Between the subject groups, no statistical difference was found for the recovery cycles of the H reflexes, yet those of the PRM reflexes differed significantly, with a striking suppression in the intact group. When comparing the reflex types, they did not differ in the SCI group, while the PRM reflexes were more strongly depressed in the intact group for durations characteristic for presynaptic inhibition. These differences may arise from the concomitant stimulation of several posterior roots containing afferent fibers of various lower extremity nerves by transcutaneous SCS, producing multi-source heteronymous presynaptic inhibition, and the collective dysfunction of inhibitory mechanisms after SCI contributing to spasticity. PRM-reflex recovery cycles additionally obtained for bilateral rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus all demonstrated a stronger suppression in the intact group. Within both subject groups, the thigh muscles showed a stronger recovery than the lower leg muscles, which may reflect a characteristic difference in motor control of diverse muscles. Based on the substantial difference between intact and SCI individuals, PRM-reflex depression tested with paired pulses could become a sensitive measure for spasticity and motor recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6932776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69327762020-01-07 Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord Hofstoetter, Ursula S. Freundl, Brigitta Binder, Heinrich Minassian, Karen PLoS One Research Article Posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes are short-latency spinal reflexes evoked by epidural or transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in clinical and physiological studies. PRM reflexes share key physiological characteristics with the H reflex elicited by electrical stimulation of large-diameter muscle spindle afferents in the tibial nerve. Here, we compared the H reflex and the PRM reflex of soleus in response to transcutaneous stimulation by studying their recovery cycles in ten neurologically intact volunteers and ten individuals with traumatic, chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The recovery cycles of the reflexes, i.e., the time course of their excitability changes, were assessed by paired pulses with conditioning-test intervals of 20–5000 ms. Between the subject groups, no statistical difference was found for the recovery cycles of the H reflexes, yet those of the PRM reflexes differed significantly, with a striking suppression in the intact group. When comparing the reflex types, they did not differ in the SCI group, while the PRM reflexes were more strongly depressed in the intact group for durations characteristic for presynaptic inhibition. These differences may arise from the concomitant stimulation of several posterior roots containing afferent fibers of various lower extremity nerves by transcutaneous SCS, producing multi-source heteronymous presynaptic inhibition, and the collective dysfunction of inhibitory mechanisms after SCI contributing to spasticity. PRM-reflex recovery cycles additionally obtained for bilateral rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus all demonstrated a stronger suppression in the intact group. Within both subject groups, the thigh muscles showed a stronger recovery than the lower leg muscles, which may reflect a characteristic difference in motor control of diverse muscles. Based on the substantial difference between intact and SCI individuals, PRM-reflex depression tested with paired pulses could become a sensitive measure for spasticity and motor recovery. Public Library of Science 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6932776/ /pubmed/31877192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227057 Text en © 2019 Hofstoetter et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hofstoetter, Ursula S.
Freundl, Brigitta
Binder, Heinrich
Minassian, Karen
Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord
title Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord
title_full Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord
title_fullStr Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord
title_full_unstemmed Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord
title_short Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord
title_sort recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the h reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6932776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227057
work_keys_str_mv AT hofstoetterursulas recoverycyclesofposteriorrootmusclereflexesevokedbytranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationandofthehreflexinindividualswithintactandinjuredspinalcord
AT freundlbrigitta recoverycyclesofposteriorrootmusclereflexesevokedbytranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationandofthehreflexinindividualswithintactandinjuredspinalcord
AT binderheinrich recoverycyclesofposteriorrootmusclereflexesevokedbytranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationandofthehreflexinindividualswithintactandinjuredspinalcord
AT minassiankaren recoverycyclesofposteriorrootmusclereflexesevokedbytranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationandofthehreflexinindividualswithintactandinjuredspinalcord