Cargando…

Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, are transforming clinical oncology. Yet, insufficient overall response rate, and accelerated tumor growth rate in some patients, highlight the need for identifying potential responders. To construct a computational model, identifying response pred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perlstein, D., Shlagman, O., Kogan, Y., Halevi-Tobias, K., Yakobson, A., Lazarev, I., Agur, Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6932803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226869
_version_ 1783483080698232832
author Perlstein, D.
Shlagman, O.
Kogan, Y.
Halevi-Tobias, K.
Yakobson, A.
Lazarev, I.
Agur, Z.
author_facet Perlstein, D.
Shlagman, O.
Kogan, Y.
Halevi-Tobias, K.
Yakobson, A.
Lazarev, I.
Agur, Z.
author_sort Perlstein, D.
collection PubMed
description Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, are transforming clinical oncology. Yet, insufficient overall response rate, and accelerated tumor growth rate in some patients, highlight the need for identifying potential responders. To construct a computational model, identifying response predictors, and enabling immunotherapy personalization. The combined dynamics of cellular immunity, pembrolizumab, and the melanoma cancer were modeled by a set of ordinary differential equations. The model relies on a scheme of T memory stem cells, progressively differentiating into effector CD8(+) T cells, and additionally includes T cell exhaustion, reinvigoration and senescence. Clinical data of a pembrolizumab-treated patient with advanced melanoma (Patient O’) were used for model calibration and simulations. Virtual patient populations, varying in one parameter or more, were generated for retrieving clinical studies. Simulations captured the major features of Patient O’s disease, displaying a good fit to her clinical data. A temporary increase in tumor burden, as implied by the clinical data, was obtained only when assuming aberrant self-renewal rates. Variation in effector T cell cytotoxicity was sufficient for simulating dynamics that vary from rapid progression to complete cure, while variation in tumor immunogenicity has a delayed and limited effect on response. Simulations of a-specific clinical trial were in good agreement with the clinical results, demonstrating positive correlations between response to pembrolizumab and the ratio of reinvigoration to baseline tumor load. These results were obtained by assuming inter-patient variation in the toxicity of effector CD8+ T cells, and in their intrinsic division rate, as well as by assuming that the intrinsic division rate of cancer cells is correlated with the baseline tumor burden. In conclusion, hyperprogression can result from lower patient-specific effector cytotoxicity, a temporary increase in tumor load is unlikely to result from real tumor growth, and the ratio of reinvigoration to tumor load can predict personal response to pembrolizumab. Upon further validation, the model can serve for immunotherapy personalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6932803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69328032020-01-07 Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug Perlstein, D. Shlagman, O. Kogan, Y. Halevi-Tobias, K. Yakobson, A. Lazarev, I. Agur, Z. PLoS One Research Article Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, are transforming clinical oncology. Yet, insufficient overall response rate, and accelerated tumor growth rate in some patients, highlight the need for identifying potential responders. To construct a computational model, identifying response predictors, and enabling immunotherapy personalization. The combined dynamics of cellular immunity, pembrolizumab, and the melanoma cancer were modeled by a set of ordinary differential equations. The model relies on a scheme of T memory stem cells, progressively differentiating into effector CD8(+) T cells, and additionally includes T cell exhaustion, reinvigoration and senescence. Clinical data of a pembrolizumab-treated patient with advanced melanoma (Patient O’) were used for model calibration and simulations. Virtual patient populations, varying in one parameter or more, were generated for retrieving clinical studies. Simulations captured the major features of Patient O’s disease, displaying a good fit to her clinical data. A temporary increase in tumor burden, as implied by the clinical data, was obtained only when assuming aberrant self-renewal rates. Variation in effector T cell cytotoxicity was sufficient for simulating dynamics that vary from rapid progression to complete cure, while variation in tumor immunogenicity has a delayed and limited effect on response. Simulations of a-specific clinical trial were in good agreement with the clinical results, demonstrating positive correlations between response to pembrolizumab and the ratio of reinvigoration to baseline tumor load. These results were obtained by assuming inter-patient variation in the toxicity of effector CD8+ T cells, and in their intrinsic division rate, as well as by assuming that the intrinsic division rate of cancer cells is correlated with the baseline tumor burden. In conclusion, hyperprogression can result from lower patient-specific effector cytotoxicity, a temporary increase in tumor load is unlikely to result from real tumor growth, and the ratio of reinvigoration to tumor load can predict personal response to pembrolizumab. Upon further validation, the model can serve for immunotherapy personalization. Public Library of Science 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6932803/ /pubmed/31877168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226869 Text en © 2019 Perlstein et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perlstein, D.
Shlagman, O.
Kogan, Y.
Halevi-Tobias, K.
Yakobson, A.
Lazarev, I.
Agur, Z.
Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug
title Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug
title_full Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug
title_fullStr Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug
title_full_unstemmed Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug
title_short Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug
title_sort personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6932803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226869
work_keys_str_mv AT perlsteind personalresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsofpatientswithadvancedmelanomaexplainedbyacomputationalmodelofcellularimmunitytumorgrowthanddrug
AT shlagmano personalresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsofpatientswithadvancedmelanomaexplainedbyacomputationalmodelofcellularimmunitytumorgrowthanddrug
AT kogany personalresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsofpatientswithadvancedmelanomaexplainedbyacomputationalmodelofcellularimmunitytumorgrowthanddrug
AT halevitobiask personalresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsofpatientswithadvancedmelanomaexplainedbyacomputationalmodelofcellularimmunitytumorgrowthanddrug
AT yakobsona personalresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsofpatientswithadvancedmelanomaexplainedbyacomputationalmodelofcellularimmunitytumorgrowthanddrug
AT lazarevi personalresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsofpatientswithadvancedmelanomaexplainedbyacomputationalmodelofcellularimmunitytumorgrowthanddrug
AT agurz personalresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsofpatientswithadvancedmelanomaexplainedbyacomputationalmodelofcellularimmunitytumorgrowthanddrug