Cargando…

A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: Currently, the standard screening tool for breast cancer is screening mammography. There have been many efforts to develop a blood-based diagnostic assay for breast cancer diagnosis; however, none have been approved for clinical use at this time. The purpose of this study was to determine t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yumi, Kang, Un-Beom, Kim, Sungsoo, Lee, Han-Byoel, Moon, Hyeong-Gon, Han, Wonshik, Noh, Dong-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6933034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897331
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e57
_version_ 1783483131463991296
author Kim, Yumi
Kang, Un-Beom
Kim, Sungsoo
Lee, Han-Byoel
Moon, Hyeong-Gon
Han, Wonshik
Noh, Dong-Young
author_facet Kim, Yumi
Kang, Un-Beom
Kim, Sungsoo
Lee, Han-Byoel
Moon, Hyeong-Gon
Han, Wonshik
Noh, Dong-Young
author_sort Kim, Yumi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Currently, the standard screening tool for breast cancer is screening mammography. There have been many efforts to develop a blood-based diagnostic assay for breast cancer diagnosis; however, none have been approved for clinical use at this time. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of a novel blood-based proteomic test for aiding breast cancer diagnosis in a relatively large cohort of cancer patients. METHODS: A blood-based test using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) measured by mass spectrometry to quantify 3 peptides (apolipoprotein C-1, carbonic anhydrase 1, and neural cell adhesion molecule L1-like protein) present in human plasma was investigated. A total of 1,129 blood samples from 575 breast cancer patients, 454 healthy controls, and 100 patients with other malignancies were used to verify and optimize the assay. RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the MRM-based proteomic assay were 71.6%, 85.3%, and 77%, respectively; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.8323. The proteomic assay did not demonstrate diagnostic accuracy in patients with other types of malignancies including thyroid, pancreatic, lung, and colon cancers. The diagnostic performance of the proteomic assay was not associated with the timing of blood sampling before or after anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrated that an MRM-based proteomic assay that measures plasma levels of three specific peptides can be a useful tool for breast cancer screening and its accuracy is cancer-type specific.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6933034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69330342020-01-02 A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer Kim, Yumi Kang, Un-Beom Kim, Sungsoo Lee, Han-Byoel Moon, Hyeong-Gon Han, Wonshik Noh, Dong-Young J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Currently, the standard screening tool for breast cancer is screening mammography. There have been many efforts to develop a blood-based diagnostic assay for breast cancer diagnosis; however, none have been approved for clinical use at this time. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of a novel blood-based proteomic test for aiding breast cancer diagnosis in a relatively large cohort of cancer patients. METHODS: A blood-based test using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) measured by mass spectrometry to quantify 3 peptides (apolipoprotein C-1, carbonic anhydrase 1, and neural cell adhesion molecule L1-like protein) present in human plasma was investigated. A total of 1,129 blood samples from 575 breast cancer patients, 454 healthy controls, and 100 patients with other malignancies were used to verify and optimize the assay. RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the MRM-based proteomic assay were 71.6%, 85.3%, and 77%, respectively; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.8323. The proteomic assay did not demonstrate diagnostic accuracy in patients with other types of malignancies including thyroid, pancreatic, lung, and colon cancers. The diagnostic performance of the proteomic assay was not associated with the timing of blood sampling before or after anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrated that an MRM-based proteomic assay that measures plasma levels of three specific peptides can be a useful tool for breast cancer screening and its accuracy is cancer-type specific. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6933034/ /pubmed/31897331 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e57 Text en © 2019 Korean Breast Cancer Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Yumi
Kang, Un-Beom
Kim, Sungsoo
Lee, Han-Byoel
Moon, Hyeong-Gon
Han, Wonshik
Noh, Dong-Young
A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer
title A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer
title_full A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer
title_fullStr A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer
title_short A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer
title_sort validation study of a multiple reaction monitoring-based proteomic assay to diagnose breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6933034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897331
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e57
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyumi avalidationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT kangunbeom avalidationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT kimsungsoo avalidationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT leehanbyoel avalidationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT moonhyeonggon avalidationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT hanwonshik avalidationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT nohdongyoung avalidationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT kimyumi validationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT kangunbeom validationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT kimsungsoo validationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT leehanbyoel validationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT moonhyeonggon validationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT hanwonshik validationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer
AT nohdongyoung validationstudyofamultiplereactionmonitoringbasedproteomicassaytodiagnosebreastcancer