Cargando…
Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study
ABSTRACT: Absolute quantification of radiotracer distribution using SPECT/CT imaging is of great importance for dosimetry aimed at personalized radionuclide precision treatment. However, its accuracy depends on many factors. Using phantom measurements, this multi-vendor and multi-center study evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6933042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31879813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-019-0268-5 |
_version_ | 1783483133346185216 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Steffie M. B. van der Werf, Niels R. Segbers, Marcel van Velden, Floris H. P. Wierts, Roel Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K. Konijnenberg, Mark W. Lazarenko, Sergiy V. Visser, Eric P. Gotthardt, Martin |
author_facet | Peters, Steffie M. B. van der Werf, Niels R. Segbers, Marcel van Velden, Floris H. P. Wierts, Roel Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K. Konijnenberg, Mark W. Lazarenko, Sergiy V. Visser, Eric P. Gotthardt, Martin |
author_sort | Peters, Steffie M. B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Absolute quantification of radiotracer distribution using SPECT/CT imaging is of great importance for dosimetry aimed at personalized radionuclide precision treatment. However, its accuracy depends on many factors. Using phantom measurements, this multi-vendor and multi-center study evaluates the quantitative accuracy and inter-system variability of various SPECT/CT systems as well as the effect of patient size, processing software and reconstruction algorithms on recovery coefficients (RC). METHODS: Five SPECT/CT systems were included: Discovery™ NM/CT 670 Pro (GE Healthcare), Precedence™ 6 (Philips Healthcare), Symbia Intevo™, and Symbia™ T16 (twice) (Siemens Healthineers). Three phantoms were used based on the NEMA IEC body phantom without lung insert simulating body mass indexes (BMI) of 25, 28, and 47 kg/m(2). Six spheres (0.5–26.5 mL) and background were filled with 0.1 and 0.01 MBq/mL (99m)Tc-pertechnetate, respectively. Volumes of interest (VOI) of spheres were obtained by a region growing technique using a 50% threshold of the maximum voxel value corrected for background activity. RC, defined as imaged activity concentration divided by actual activity concentration, were determined for maximum (RC(max)) and mean voxel value (RC(mean)) in the VOI for each sphere diameter. Inter-system variability was expressed as median absolute deviation (MAD) of RC. Acquisition settings were standardized. Images were reconstructed using vendor-specific 3D iterative reconstruction algorithms with institute-specific settings used in clinical practice and processed using a standardized, in-house developed processing tool based on the SimpleITK framework. Additionally, all data were reconstructed with a vendor-neutral reconstruction algorithm (Hybrid Recon™; Hermes Medical Solutions). RESULTS: RC decreased with decreasing sphere diameter for each system. Inter-system variability (MAD) was 16 and 17% for RC(mean) and RC(max), respectively. Standardized reconstruction decreased this variability to 4 and 5%. High BMI hampers quantification of small lesions (< 10 ml). CONCLUSION: Absolute SPECT quantification in a multi-center and multi-vendor setting is feasible, especially when reconstruction protocols are standardized, paving the way for a standard for absolute quantitative SPECT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6933042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69330422020-01-09 Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study Peters, Steffie M. B. van der Werf, Niels R. Segbers, Marcel van Velden, Floris H. P. Wierts, Roel Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K. Konijnenberg, Mark W. Lazarenko, Sergiy V. Visser, Eric P. Gotthardt, Martin EJNMMI Phys Original Research ABSTRACT: Absolute quantification of radiotracer distribution using SPECT/CT imaging is of great importance for dosimetry aimed at personalized radionuclide precision treatment. However, its accuracy depends on many factors. Using phantom measurements, this multi-vendor and multi-center study evaluates the quantitative accuracy and inter-system variability of various SPECT/CT systems as well as the effect of patient size, processing software and reconstruction algorithms on recovery coefficients (RC). METHODS: Five SPECT/CT systems were included: Discovery™ NM/CT 670 Pro (GE Healthcare), Precedence™ 6 (Philips Healthcare), Symbia Intevo™, and Symbia™ T16 (twice) (Siemens Healthineers). Three phantoms were used based on the NEMA IEC body phantom without lung insert simulating body mass indexes (BMI) of 25, 28, and 47 kg/m(2). Six spheres (0.5–26.5 mL) and background were filled with 0.1 and 0.01 MBq/mL (99m)Tc-pertechnetate, respectively. Volumes of interest (VOI) of spheres were obtained by a region growing technique using a 50% threshold of the maximum voxel value corrected for background activity. RC, defined as imaged activity concentration divided by actual activity concentration, were determined for maximum (RC(max)) and mean voxel value (RC(mean)) in the VOI for each sphere diameter. Inter-system variability was expressed as median absolute deviation (MAD) of RC. Acquisition settings were standardized. Images were reconstructed using vendor-specific 3D iterative reconstruction algorithms with institute-specific settings used in clinical practice and processed using a standardized, in-house developed processing tool based on the SimpleITK framework. Additionally, all data were reconstructed with a vendor-neutral reconstruction algorithm (Hybrid Recon™; Hermes Medical Solutions). RESULTS: RC decreased with decreasing sphere diameter for each system. Inter-system variability (MAD) was 16 and 17% for RC(mean) and RC(max), respectively. Standardized reconstruction decreased this variability to 4 and 5%. High BMI hampers quantification of small lesions (< 10 ml). CONCLUSION: Absolute SPECT quantification in a multi-center and multi-vendor setting is feasible, especially when reconstruction protocols are standardized, paving the way for a standard for absolute quantitative SPECT. Springer International Publishing 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6933042/ /pubmed/31879813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-019-0268-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Peters, Steffie M. B. van der Werf, Niels R. Segbers, Marcel van Velden, Floris H. P. Wierts, Roel Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K. Konijnenberg, Mark W. Lazarenko, Sergiy V. Visser, Eric P. Gotthardt, Martin Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study |
title | Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study |
title_full | Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study |
title_fullStr | Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study |
title_short | Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study |
title_sort | towards standardization of absolute spect/ct quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6933042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31879813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-019-0268-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peterssteffiemb towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT vanderwerfnielsr towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT segbersmarcel towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT vanveldenflorishp towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT wiertsroel towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT bloklandkoosjak towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT konijnenbergmarkw towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT lazarenkosergiyv towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT visserericp towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy AT gotthardtmartin towardsstandardizationofabsolutespectctquantificationamulticenterandmultivendorphantomstudy |