Cargando…

Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND: Sonication is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, conditions and definition criteria for PJI vary among studies. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance (i.e., specificity, sensitivity) of sonicate fluid culture (S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bellova, Petri, Knop-Hammad, Veronika, Königshausen, Matthias, Mempel, Eileen, Frieler, Sven, Gessmann, Jan, Schildhauer, Thomas A., Baecker, Hinnerk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6933748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31878902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-3006-1
_version_ 1783483272413577216
author Bellova, Petri
Knop-Hammad, Veronika
Königshausen, Matthias
Mempel, Eileen
Frieler, Sven
Gessmann, Jan
Schildhauer, Thomas A.
Baecker, Hinnerk
author_facet Bellova, Petri
Knop-Hammad, Veronika
Königshausen, Matthias
Mempel, Eileen
Frieler, Sven
Gessmann, Jan
Schildhauer, Thomas A.
Baecker, Hinnerk
author_sort Bellova, Petri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sonication is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, conditions and definition criteria for PJI vary among studies. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance (i.e., specificity, sensitivity) of sonicate fluid culture (SFC) against periprosthetic tissue culture (PTC), when using European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. METHODS: From March 2017 to April 2018, 257 implants were submitted for sonication. PJI was defined according to the EBJIS criteria as well as according to the International Consensus Meeting criteria of 2018 (ICM 2018). Only cases with at least one corresponding tissue sample were included. Samples were cultured using traditional microbiological plating techniques. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using two-by-two contingency tables. McNemar’s test was used to compare proportions among paired samples. Subgroup analysis was performed dividing the cohort according to the site of PJI, previous antibiotic treatment, and time of manifestation. Prevalence of pathogens was determined for all patients as well as for specific subgroups. RESULTS: Among the 257 cases, 145 and 112 were defined as PJI and aseptic failure, respectively. When using the EBJIS criteria, the sensitivity of SFC and PTC was 69.0 and 62.8%, respectively (p = .04). Meanwhile, the specificity was 90.2 and 92.9%, respectively (p = .65). When adopting ICM 2018 criteria, the sensitivity of SFC and PTC was 87.5 and 84.4% (p = .63) respectively, while the specificity was 85.1 and 92.5% (p = .05), respectively. The most commonly identified pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (26% overall), while 31% of PJI were culture-negative and 9% polymicrobial. CONCLUSIONS: SFC exhibited significantly greater sensitivity versus PTC when using the EBJIS criteria. Nevertheless, the diagnosis of PJI remains a difficult challenge and different diagnostic tools are necessary to optimize the outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6933748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69337482019-12-30 Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection Bellova, Petri Knop-Hammad, Veronika Königshausen, Matthias Mempel, Eileen Frieler, Sven Gessmann, Jan Schildhauer, Thomas A. Baecker, Hinnerk BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Sonication is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, conditions and definition criteria for PJI vary among studies. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance (i.e., specificity, sensitivity) of sonicate fluid culture (SFC) against periprosthetic tissue culture (PTC), when using European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. METHODS: From March 2017 to April 2018, 257 implants were submitted for sonication. PJI was defined according to the EBJIS criteria as well as according to the International Consensus Meeting criteria of 2018 (ICM 2018). Only cases with at least one corresponding tissue sample were included. Samples were cultured using traditional microbiological plating techniques. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using two-by-two contingency tables. McNemar’s test was used to compare proportions among paired samples. Subgroup analysis was performed dividing the cohort according to the site of PJI, previous antibiotic treatment, and time of manifestation. Prevalence of pathogens was determined for all patients as well as for specific subgroups. RESULTS: Among the 257 cases, 145 and 112 were defined as PJI and aseptic failure, respectively. When using the EBJIS criteria, the sensitivity of SFC and PTC was 69.0 and 62.8%, respectively (p = .04). Meanwhile, the specificity was 90.2 and 92.9%, respectively (p = .65). When adopting ICM 2018 criteria, the sensitivity of SFC and PTC was 87.5 and 84.4% (p = .63) respectively, while the specificity was 85.1 and 92.5% (p = .05), respectively. The most commonly identified pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (26% overall), while 31% of PJI were culture-negative and 9% polymicrobial. CONCLUSIONS: SFC exhibited significantly greater sensitivity versus PTC when using the EBJIS criteria. Nevertheless, the diagnosis of PJI remains a difficult challenge and different diagnostic tools are necessary to optimize the outcome. BioMed Central 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6933748/ /pubmed/31878902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-3006-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bellova, Petri
Knop-Hammad, Veronika
Königshausen, Matthias
Mempel, Eileen
Frieler, Sven
Gessmann, Jan
Schildhauer, Thomas A.
Baecker, Hinnerk
Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
title Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
title_full Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
title_fullStr Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
title_full_unstemmed Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
title_short Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
title_sort sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6933748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31878902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-3006-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bellovapetri sonicationofretrievedimplantsimprovessensitivityinthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfection
AT knophammadveronika sonicationofretrievedimplantsimprovessensitivityinthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfection
AT konigshausenmatthias sonicationofretrievedimplantsimprovessensitivityinthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfection
AT mempeleileen sonicationofretrievedimplantsimprovessensitivityinthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfection
AT frielersven sonicationofretrievedimplantsimprovessensitivityinthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfection
AT gessmannjan sonicationofretrievedimplantsimprovessensitivityinthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfection
AT schildhauerthomasa sonicationofretrievedimplantsimprovessensitivityinthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfection
AT baeckerhinnerk sonicationofretrievedimplantsimprovessensitivityinthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfection