Cargando…
Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo)
Genomic information can contribute significantly to the increase in accuracy of genetic predictions compared to using pedigree relationships alone. The main objective of this study was to compare the prediction ability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31921294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01248 |
_version_ | 1783483341691944960 |
---|---|
author | Abdalla, Emhimad E. A. Schenkel, Flavio S. Emamgholi Begli, Hakimeh Willems, Owen W. van As, Pieter Vanderhout, Ryley Wood, Benjamin J. Baes, Christine F. |
author_facet | Abdalla, Emhimad E. A. Schenkel, Flavio S. Emamgholi Begli, Hakimeh Willems, Owen W. van As, Pieter Vanderhout, Ryley Wood, Benjamin J. Baes, Christine F. |
author_sort | Abdalla, Emhimad E. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic information can contribute significantly to the increase in accuracy of genetic predictions compared to using pedigree relationships alone. The main objective of this study was to compare the prediction ability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) models. Turkey records of feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake, body weight, breast meat yield, and walking ability were provided by Hybrid Turkeys, Kitchener, Canada. This data was analyzed using pedigree-based and single-step genomic models. The genomic relationship matrix was calculated either using observed allele frequencies, all allele frequencies equal to 0.5 or with a different scaling. To avoid potential problems with inversion, three different weighting factors were applied to combine the genomic and pedigree matrices. Across the studied traits, ssGBLUP had higher heritability estimates and significantly outperformed PBLUP in terms of accuracy. Walking ability was genetically negatively correlated to body weight and breast meat yield; however, it was not correlated to feed conversion ratio (FCR) or residual feed intake (RFI). Body weight showed a moderate positive genetic correlation to feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake and breast meat yield. Feed conversion ratio was strongly correlated to residual feed intake (0.68 ± 0.06). There was almost no genetic correlation between breast meat yield and feed efficiency traits. Larger differences in accuracy between PBLUP and ssGBLUP were observed for traits with lower heritability. Results of the three weighting factors showed only slight differences and an increase in accuracy of prediction compared to PBLUP. Slightly different levels of bias were observed across the models, but were higher among the traits; BMY was the only trait that had a regression coefficient higher than 1 (1.38 to 1.41). We show that incorporating genomic information increases the prediction accuracy for preselection of young candidate turkeys for the five traits investigated. Single-step genomic prediction showed substantially higher accuracy estimates than the pedigree-based model, and only slight differences in bias were observed across the alternate models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6934134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69341342020-01-09 Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) Abdalla, Emhimad E. A. Schenkel, Flavio S. Emamgholi Begli, Hakimeh Willems, Owen W. van As, Pieter Vanderhout, Ryley Wood, Benjamin J. Baes, Christine F. Front Genet Genetics Genomic information can contribute significantly to the increase in accuracy of genetic predictions compared to using pedigree relationships alone. The main objective of this study was to compare the prediction ability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) models. Turkey records of feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake, body weight, breast meat yield, and walking ability were provided by Hybrid Turkeys, Kitchener, Canada. This data was analyzed using pedigree-based and single-step genomic models. The genomic relationship matrix was calculated either using observed allele frequencies, all allele frequencies equal to 0.5 or with a different scaling. To avoid potential problems with inversion, three different weighting factors were applied to combine the genomic and pedigree matrices. Across the studied traits, ssGBLUP had higher heritability estimates and significantly outperformed PBLUP in terms of accuracy. Walking ability was genetically negatively correlated to body weight and breast meat yield; however, it was not correlated to feed conversion ratio (FCR) or residual feed intake (RFI). Body weight showed a moderate positive genetic correlation to feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake and breast meat yield. Feed conversion ratio was strongly correlated to residual feed intake (0.68 ± 0.06). There was almost no genetic correlation between breast meat yield and feed efficiency traits. Larger differences in accuracy between PBLUP and ssGBLUP were observed for traits with lower heritability. Results of the three weighting factors showed only slight differences and an increase in accuracy of prediction compared to PBLUP. Slightly different levels of bias were observed across the models, but were higher among the traits; BMY was the only trait that had a regression coefficient higher than 1 (1.38 to 1.41). We show that incorporating genomic information increases the prediction accuracy for preselection of young candidate turkeys for the five traits investigated. Single-step genomic prediction showed substantially higher accuracy estimates than the pedigree-based model, and only slight differences in bias were observed across the alternate models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6934134/ /pubmed/31921294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01248 Text en Copyright © 2019 Abdalla, Schenkel, Emamgholi Begli, Willems, van As, Vanderhout, Wood and Baes http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Abdalla, Emhimad E. A. Schenkel, Flavio S. Emamgholi Begli, Hakimeh Willems, Owen W. van As, Pieter Vanderhout, Ryley Wood, Benjamin J. Baes, Christine F. Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) |
title | Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) |
title_full | Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) |
title_fullStr | Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) |
title_short | Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) |
title_sort | single-step methodology for genomic evaluation in turkeys (meleagris gallopavo) |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31921294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdallaemhimadea singlestepmethodologyforgenomicevaluationinturkeysmeleagrisgallopavo AT schenkelflavios singlestepmethodologyforgenomicevaluationinturkeysmeleagrisgallopavo AT emamgholibeglihakimeh singlestepmethodologyforgenomicevaluationinturkeysmeleagrisgallopavo AT willemsowenw singlestepmethodologyforgenomicevaluationinturkeysmeleagrisgallopavo AT vanaspieter singlestepmethodologyforgenomicevaluationinturkeysmeleagrisgallopavo AT vanderhoutryley singlestepmethodologyforgenomicevaluationinturkeysmeleagrisgallopavo AT woodbenjaminj singlestepmethodologyforgenomicevaluationinturkeysmeleagrisgallopavo AT baeschristinef singlestepmethodologyforgenomicevaluationinturkeysmeleagrisgallopavo |