Cargando…

Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme in English acute hospitals

BACKGROUND: The ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme is a quality improvement (QI) intervention introduced in English acute hospitals a decade ago to: (1) Increase time nurses spend in direct patient care. (2) Improve safety and reliability of care. (3) Improve experience for staff an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robert, Glenn, Sarre, Sophie, Maben, Jill, Griffiths, Peter, Chable, Rosemary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31358685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009457
_version_ 1783483349623373824
author Robert, Glenn
Sarre, Sophie
Maben, Jill
Griffiths, Peter
Chable, Rosemary
author_facet Robert, Glenn
Sarre, Sophie
Maben, Jill
Griffiths, Peter
Chable, Rosemary
author_sort Robert, Glenn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme is a quality improvement (QI) intervention introduced in English acute hospitals a decade ago to: (1) Increase time nurses spend in direct patient care. (2) Improve safety and reliability of care. (3) Improve experience for staff and patients. (4) Make changes to physical environments to improve efficiency. OBJECTIVE: To explore how timing of adoption, local implementation strategies and processes of assimilation into day-to-day practice relate to one another and shape any sustained impact and wider legacies of a large-scale QI intervention. DESIGN: Multiple methods within six hospitals including 88 interviews (with Productive Ward leads, ward staff, Patient and Public Involvement representatives and senior managers), 10 ward manager questionnaires and structured observations on 12 randomly selected wards. RESULTS: Resource constraints and a managerial desire for standardisation meant that, over time, there was a shift away from the original vision of empowering ward staff to take ownership of Productive Ward towards a range of implementation ‘short cuts’. Nonetheless, material legacies (eg, displaying metrics data; storage systems) have remained in place for up to a decade after initial implementation as have some specific practices (eg, protected mealtimes). Variations in timing of adoption, local implementation strategies and contextual changes influenced assimilation into routine practice and subsequent legacies. Productive Ward has informed wider organisational QI strategies that remain in place today and developed lasting QI capabilities among those meaningfully involved in its implementation. CONCLUSIONS: As an ongoing QI approach Productive Ward has not been sustained but has informed contemporary organisational QI practices and strategies. Judgements about the long-term sustainability of QI interventions should consider the evolutionary and adaptive nature of change processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6934234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69342342020-01-06 Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme in English acute hospitals Robert, Glenn Sarre, Sophie Maben, Jill Griffiths, Peter Chable, Rosemary BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: The ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme is a quality improvement (QI) intervention introduced in English acute hospitals a decade ago to: (1) Increase time nurses spend in direct patient care. (2) Improve safety and reliability of care. (3) Improve experience for staff and patients. (4) Make changes to physical environments to improve efficiency. OBJECTIVE: To explore how timing of adoption, local implementation strategies and processes of assimilation into day-to-day practice relate to one another and shape any sustained impact and wider legacies of a large-scale QI intervention. DESIGN: Multiple methods within six hospitals including 88 interviews (with Productive Ward leads, ward staff, Patient and Public Involvement representatives and senior managers), 10 ward manager questionnaires and structured observations on 12 randomly selected wards. RESULTS: Resource constraints and a managerial desire for standardisation meant that, over time, there was a shift away from the original vision of empowering ward staff to take ownership of Productive Ward towards a range of implementation ‘short cuts’. Nonetheless, material legacies (eg, displaying metrics data; storage systems) have remained in place for up to a decade after initial implementation as have some specific practices (eg, protected mealtimes). Variations in timing of adoption, local implementation strategies and contextual changes influenced assimilation into routine practice and subsequent legacies. Productive Ward has informed wider organisational QI strategies that remain in place today and developed lasting QI capabilities among those meaningfully involved in its implementation. CONCLUSIONS: As an ongoing QI approach Productive Ward has not been sustained but has informed contemporary organisational QI practices and strategies. Judgements about the long-term sustainability of QI interventions should consider the evolutionary and adaptive nature of change processes. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6934234/ /pubmed/31358685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009457 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Robert, Glenn
Sarre, Sophie
Maben, Jill
Griffiths, Peter
Chable, Rosemary
Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme in English acute hospitals
title Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme in English acute hospitals
title_full Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme in English acute hospitals
title_fullStr Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme in English acute hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme in English acute hospitals
title_short Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care’ programme in English acute hospitals
title_sort exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the ‘productive ward: releasing time to care’ programme in english acute hospitals
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31358685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009457
work_keys_str_mv AT robertglenn exploringthesustainabilityofqualityimprovementinterventionsinhealthcareorganisationsamultiplemethodsstudyofthe10yearimpactoftheproductivewardreleasingtimetocareprogrammeinenglishacutehospitals
AT sarresophie exploringthesustainabilityofqualityimprovementinterventionsinhealthcareorganisationsamultiplemethodsstudyofthe10yearimpactoftheproductivewardreleasingtimetocareprogrammeinenglishacutehospitals
AT mabenjill exploringthesustainabilityofqualityimprovementinterventionsinhealthcareorganisationsamultiplemethodsstudyofthe10yearimpactoftheproductivewardreleasingtimetocareprogrammeinenglishacutehospitals
AT griffithspeter exploringthesustainabilityofqualityimprovementinterventionsinhealthcareorganisationsamultiplemethodsstudyofthe10yearimpactoftheproductivewardreleasingtimetocareprogrammeinenglishacutehospitals
AT chablerosemary exploringthesustainabilityofqualityimprovementinterventionsinhealthcareorganisationsamultiplemethodsstudyofthe10yearimpactoftheproductivewardreleasingtimetocareprogrammeinenglishacutehospitals