Cargando…
Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study
OBJECTIVES: An innovative calibrated bur, aiming to improve precision during reduction of the incisal edge, was recently proposed to guide practitioners during tooth preparation. However, limited information is available concerning its usefulness in dental preclinical education. The aim of this stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.184 |
_version_ | 1783483373326434304 |
---|---|
author | Yee, Soho Richert, Raphaël Viguie, Gilbert Couraud, Sébastien Dehurtevent, Marion Fages, Michel Corne, Pascale Ducret, Maxime |
author_facet | Yee, Soho Richert, Raphaël Viguie, Gilbert Couraud, Sébastien Dehurtevent, Marion Fages, Michel Corne, Pascale Ducret, Maxime |
author_sort | Yee, Soho |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: An innovative calibrated bur, aiming to improve precision during reduction of the incisal edge, was recently proposed to guide practitioners during tooth preparation. However, limited information is available concerning its usefulness in dental preclinical education. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether using this innovative guided bur improves learning experience quality and the performance of students during tooth preparation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After having provided written consent, 60 second‐year students were divided into two groups. One group used a 1‐mm rounded bur to perform depth grooves, whereas the second group used the innovative guided bur, consisting in a 2‐mm‐depth marker with a stopping surface. Once the grooves were obtained, they were then connected using the same wheel bur in both groups. The aim was to obtain a final 2‐mm reduction of the incisal edge. Quality of the learning experience (stress level, motivation to restart, self‐evaluation of the preparation, and difficulty) was quantified using a visual analog scale. Duration of the procedure was also measured in both groups. 3D measurements for each tooth were performed using an STL comparison software. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of stress and self‐evaluation of the preparation. Students in the guided bur group reported significantly lower perception of exercise difficulty (p < .001) and significantly higher motivation to restart the procedure (p < .001). The guided bur group performed the procedure in 16.4% less time than the rounded bur group. The use of the guided bur led to a 23% over‐reduction, whereas the use of the rounded bur led to a 10% under‐reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the present study shows that the guided bur provides significant improvement in the student's learning experience with increased motivation and decreased perception of difficulty. It shortens the duration of procedure performance, but it also induces a reduction in preparation accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6934350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69343502019-12-30 Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study Yee, Soho Richert, Raphaël Viguie, Gilbert Couraud, Sébastien Dehurtevent, Marion Fages, Michel Corne, Pascale Ducret, Maxime Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: An innovative calibrated bur, aiming to improve precision during reduction of the incisal edge, was recently proposed to guide practitioners during tooth preparation. However, limited information is available concerning its usefulness in dental preclinical education. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether using this innovative guided bur improves learning experience quality and the performance of students during tooth preparation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After having provided written consent, 60 second‐year students were divided into two groups. One group used a 1‐mm rounded bur to perform depth grooves, whereas the second group used the innovative guided bur, consisting in a 2‐mm‐depth marker with a stopping surface. Once the grooves were obtained, they were then connected using the same wheel bur in both groups. The aim was to obtain a final 2‐mm reduction of the incisal edge. Quality of the learning experience (stress level, motivation to restart, self‐evaluation of the preparation, and difficulty) was quantified using a visual analog scale. Duration of the procedure was also measured in both groups. 3D measurements for each tooth were performed using an STL comparison software. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of stress and self‐evaluation of the preparation. Students in the guided bur group reported significantly lower perception of exercise difficulty (p < .001) and significantly higher motivation to restart the procedure (p < .001). The guided bur group performed the procedure in 16.4% less time than the rounded bur group. The use of the guided bur led to a 23% over‐reduction, whereas the use of the rounded bur led to a 10% under‐reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the present study shows that the guided bur provides significant improvement in the student's learning experience with increased motivation and decreased perception of difficulty. It shortens the duration of procedure performance, but it also induces a reduction in preparation accuracy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6934350/ /pubmed/31890295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.184 Text en ©2019 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Yee, Soho Richert, Raphaël Viguie, Gilbert Couraud, Sébastien Dehurtevent, Marion Fages, Michel Corne, Pascale Ducret, Maxime Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study |
title | Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study |
title_full | Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study |
title_short | Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study |
title_sort | evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: a pilot study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeesoho evaluationoftheuseofaguidedburduringpreclinicalteachingoftoothpreparationapilotstudy AT richertraphael evaluationoftheuseofaguidedburduringpreclinicalteachingoftoothpreparationapilotstudy AT viguiegilbert evaluationoftheuseofaguidedburduringpreclinicalteachingoftoothpreparationapilotstudy AT couraudsebastien evaluationoftheuseofaguidedburduringpreclinicalteachingoftoothpreparationapilotstudy AT dehurteventmarion evaluationoftheuseofaguidedburduringpreclinicalteachingoftoothpreparationapilotstudy AT fagesmichel evaluationoftheuseofaguidedburduringpreclinicalteachingoftoothpreparationapilotstudy AT cornepascale evaluationoftheuseofaguidedburduringpreclinicalteachingoftoothpreparationapilotstudy AT ducretmaxime evaluationoftheuseofaguidedburduringpreclinicalteachingoftoothpreparationapilotstudy |