Cargando…

In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept

There is strong in vitro cell survival evidence that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. This is coupled with the growing in vivo evidence, from post-treatment image change analysis, of a variab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Edward A. K., Henthorn, N. T., Warmenhoven, J. W., Ingram, S. P., Aitkenhead, A. H., Richardson, J. C., Sitch, P., Chadwick, A. L., Underwood, T. S. A., Merchant, M. J., Burnet, N. G., Kirkby, N. F., Kirkby, K. J., Mackay, R. I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56258-5
_version_ 1783483402200023040
author Smith, Edward A. K.
Henthorn, N. T.
Warmenhoven, J. W.
Ingram, S. P.
Aitkenhead, A. H.
Richardson, J. C.
Sitch, P.
Chadwick, A. L.
Underwood, T. S. A.
Merchant, M. J.
Burnet, N. G.
Kirkby, N. F.
Kirkby, K. J.
Mackay, R. I.
author_facet Smith, Edward A. K.
Henthorn, N. T.
Warmenhoven, J. W.
Ingram, S. P.
Aitkenhead, A. H.
Richardson, J. C.
Sitch, P.
Chadwick, A. L.
Underwood, T. S. A.
Merchant, M. J.
Burnet, N. G.
Kirkby, N. F.
Kirkby, K. J.
Mackay, R. I.
author_sort Smith, Edward A. K.
collection PubMed
description There is strong in vitro cell survival evidence that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. This is coupled with the growing in vivo evidence, from post-treatment image change analysis, of a variable RBE. Despite this, a constant RBE of 1.1 is still applied as a standard in proton therapy. However, there is a building clinical interest in incorporating a variable RBE. Recently, correlations summarising Monte Carlo-based mechanistic models of DNA damage and repair with absorbed dose and LET have been published as the Manchester mechanistic (MM) model. These correlations offer an alternative path to variable RBE compared to the more standard phenomenological models. In this proof of concept work, these correlations have been extended to acquire RBE-weighted dose distributions and calculated, along with other RBE models, on a treatment plan. The phenomenological and mechanistic models for RBE have been shown to produce comparable results with some differences in magnitude and relative distribution. The mechanistic model found a large RBE for misrepair, which phenomenological models are unable to do. The potential of the MM model to predict multiple endpoints presents a clear advantage over phenomenological models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6934522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69345222019-12-29 In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept Smith, Edward A. K. Henthorn, N. T. Warmenhoven, J. W. Ingram, S. P. Aitkenhead, A. H. Richardson, J. C. Sitch, P. Chadwick, A. L. Underwood, T. S. A. Merchant, M. J. Burnet, N. G. Kirkby, N. F. Kirkby, K. J. Mackay, R. I. Sci Rep Article There is strong in vitro cell survival evidence that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. This is coupled with the growing in vivo evidence, from post-treatment image change analysis, of a variable RBE. Despite this, a constant RBE of 1.1 is still applied as a standard in proton therapy. However, there is a building clinical interest in incorporating a variable RBE. Recently, correlations summarising Monte Carlo-based mechanistic models of DNA damage and repair with absorbed dose and LET have been published as the Manchester mechanistic (MM) model. These correlations offer an alternative path to variable RBE compared to the more standard phenomenological models. In this proof of concept work, these correlations have been extended to acquire RBE-weighted dose distributions and calculated, along with other RBE models, on a treatment plan. The phenomenological and mechanistic models for RBE have been shown to produce comparable results with some differences in magnitude and relative distribution. The mechanistic model found a large RBE for misrepair, which phenomenological models are unable to do. The potential of the MM model to predict multiple endpoints presents a clear advantage over phenomenological models. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6934522/ /pubmed/31882690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56258-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Edward A. K.
Henthorn, N. T.
Warmenhoven, J. W.
Ingram, S. P.
Aitkenhead, A. H.
Richardson, J. C.
Sitch, P.
Chadwick, A. L.
Underwood, T. S. A.
Merchant, M. J.
Burnet, N. G.
Kirkby, N. F.
Kirkby, K. J.
Mackay, R. I.
In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept
title In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept
title_full In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept
title_fullStr In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept
title_full_unstemmed In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept
title_short In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept
title_sort in silico models of dna damage and repair in proton treatment planning: a proof of concept
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56258-5
work_keys_str_mv AT smithedwardak insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT henthornnt insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT warmenhovenjw insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT ingramsp insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT aitkenheadah insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT richardsonjc insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT sitchp insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT chadwickal insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT underwoodtsa insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT merchantmj insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT burnetng insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT kirkbynf insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT kirkbykj insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept
AT mackayri insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept