Cargando…
In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept
There is strong in vitro cell survival evidence that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. This is coupled with the growing in vivo evidence, from post-treatment image change analysis, of a variab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56258-5 |
_version_ | 1783483402200023040 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Edward A. K. Henthorn, N. T. Warmenhoven, J. W. Ingram, S. P. Aitkenhead, A. H. Richardson, J. C. Sitch, P. Chadwick, A. L. Underwood, T. S. A. Merchant, M. J. Burnet, N. G. Kirkby, N. F. Kirkby, K. J. Mackay, R. I. |
author_facet | Smith, Edward A. K. Henthorn, N. T. Warmenhoven, J. W. Ingram, S. P. Aitkenhead, A. H. Richardson, J. C. Sitch, P. Chadwick, A. L. Underwood, T. S. A. Merchant, M. J. Burnet, N. G. Kirkby, N. F. Kirkby, K. J. Mackay, R. I. |
author_sort | Smith, Edward A. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is strong in vitro cell survival evidence that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. This is coupled with the growing in vivo evidence, from post-treatment image change analysis, of a variable RBE. Despite this, a constant RBE of 1.1 is still applied as a standard in proton therapy. However, there is a building clinical interest in incorporating a variable RBE. Recently, correlations summarising Monte Carlo-based mechanistic models of DNA damage and repair with absorbed dose and LET have been published as the Manchester mechanistic (MM) model. These correlations offer an alternative path to variable RBE compared to the more standard phenomenological models. In this proof of concept work, these correlations have been extended to acquire RBE-weighted dose distributions and calculated, along with other RBE models, on a treatment plan. The phenomenological and mechanistic models for RBE have been shown to produce comparable results with some differences in magnitude and relative distribution. The mechanistic model found a large RBE for misrepair, which phenomenological models are unable to do. The potential of the MM model to predict multiple endpoints presents a clear advantage over phenomenological models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6934522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69345222019-12-29 In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept Smith, Edward A. K. Henthorn, N. T. Warmenhoven, J. W. Ingram, S. P. Aitkenhead, A. H. Richardson, J. C. Sitch, P. Chadwick, A. L. Underwood, T. S. A. Merchant, M. J. Burnet, N. G. Kirkby, N. F. Kirkby, K. J. Mackay, R. I. Sci Rep Article There is strong in vitro cell survival evidence that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. This is coupled with the growing in vivo evidence, from post-treatment image change analysis, of a variable RBE. Despite this, a constant RBE of 1.1 is still applied as a standard in proton therapy. However, there is a building clinical interest in incorporating a variable RBE. Recently, correlations summarising Monte Carlo-based mechanistic models of DNA damage and repair with absorbed dose and LET have been published as the Manchester mechanistic (MM) model. These correlations offer an alternative path to variable RBE compared to the more standard phenomenological models. In this proof of concept work, these correlations have been extended to acquire RBE-weighted dose distributions and calculated, along with other RBE models, on a treatment plan. The phenomenological and mechanistic models for RBE have been shown to produce comparable results with some differences in magnitude and relative distribution. The mechanistic model found a large RBE for misrepair, which phenomenological models are unable to do. The potential of the MM model to predict multiple endpoints presents a clear advantage over phenomenological models. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6934522/ /pubmed/31882690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56258-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Smith, Edward A. K. Henthorn, N. T. Warmenhoven, J. W. Ingram, S. P. Aitkenhead, A. H. Richardson, J. C. Sitch, P. Chadwick, A. L. Underwood, T. S. A. Merchant, M. J. Burnet, N. G. Kirkby, N. F. Kirkby, K. J. Mackay, R. I. In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept |
title | In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept |
title_full | In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept |
title_fullStr | In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept |
title_full_unstemmed | In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept |
title_short | In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept |
title_sort | in silico models of dna damage and repair in proton treatment planning: a proof of concept |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56258-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithedwardak insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT henthornnt insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT warmenhovenjw insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT ingramsp insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT aitkenheadah insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT richardsonjc insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT sitchp insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT chadwickal insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT underwoodtsa insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT merchantmj insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT burnetng insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT kirkbynf insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT kirkbykj insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept AT mackayri insilicomodelsofdnadamageandrepairinprotontreatmentplanningaproofofconcept |