Cargando…

Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1

Pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment, or electroporation, can be used to load molecules into cells. The permeabilizing effect of the PEF treatment on the cellular membrane can be either reversible or irreversible depending on the severity of the PEF treatment conditions. The influence of PEF on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaessen, E. M. J., Timmermans, R. A. H., Tempelaars, M. H., Schutyser, M. A. I., den Besten, H. M. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56299-w
_version_ 1783483404839288832
author Vaessen, E. M. J.
Timmermans, R. A. H.
Tempelaars, M. H.
Schutyser, M. A. I.
den Besten, H. M. W.
author_facet Vaessen, E. M. J.
Timmermans, R. A. H.
Tempelaars, M. H.
Schutyser, M. A. I.
den Besten, H. M. W.
author_sort Vaessen, E. M. J.
collection PubMed
description Pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment, or electroporation, can be used to load molecules into cells. The permeabilizing effect of the PEF treatment on the cellular membrane can be either reversible or irreversible depending on the severity of the PEF treatment conditions. The influence of PEF on the reversibility of membrane permeabilization in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 by two different fluorescent staining methods was investigated in this study. Whereas staining with propidium iodide (PI) before and after PEF treatment indicated small reversible permeabilized fractions of maximum 14%, the use of a double staining method with PI and SYTOX Green suggested larger reversible permeabilized fractions up to 40% of the population. This difference shows that the choice for a fluorescent staining method affects the conclusions drawn regarding reversibility of membrane permeabilization. Additionally, the effect of PEF treatment conditions on membrane integrity was compared, indicating a relation between critical electric field strength, cell size and membrane permeabilization. Overall this study showed the possibilities and limitations of fluorescent membrane integrity staining methods for PEF studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6934533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69345332019-12-29 Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 Vaessen, E. M. J. Timmermans, R. A. H. Tempelaars, M. H. Schutyser, M. A. I. den Besten, H. M. W. Sci Rep Article Pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment, or electroporation, can be used to load molecules into cells. The permeabilizing effect of the PEF treatment on the cellular membrane can be either reversible or irreversible depending on the severity of the PEF treatment conditions. The influence of PEF on the reversibility of membrane permeabilization in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 by two different fluorescent staining methods was investigated in this study. Whereas staining with propidium iodide (PI) before and after PEF treatment indicated small reversible permeabilized fractions of maximum 14%, the use of a double staining method with PI and SYTOX Green suggested larger reversible permeabilized fractions up to 40% of the population. This difference shows that the choice for a fluorescent staining method affects the conclusions drawn regarding reversibility of membrane permeabilization. Additionally, the effect of PEF treatment conditions on membrane integrity was compared, indicating a relation between critical electric field strength, cell size and membrane permeabilization. Overall this study showed the possibilities and limitations of fluorescent membrane integrity staining methods for PEF studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6934533/ /pubmed/31882651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56299-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Vaessen, E. M. J.
Timmermans, R. A. H.
Tempelaars, M. H.
Schutyser, M. A. I.
den Besten, H. M. W.
Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1
title Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1
title_full Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1
title_fullStr Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1
title_full_unstemmed Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1
title_short Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1
title_sort reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in lactobacillus plantarum wcfs1
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56299-w
work_keys_str_mv AT vaessenemj reversibilityofmembranepermeabilizationuponpulsedelectricfieldtreatmentinlactobacillusplantarumwcfs1
AT timmermansrah reversibilityofmembranepermeabilizationuponpulsedelectricfieldtreatmentinlactobacillusplantarumwcfs1
AT tempelaarsmh reversibilityofmembranepermeabilizationuponpulsedelectricfieldtreatmentinlactobacillusplantarumwcfs1
AT schutysermai reversibilityofmembranepermeabilizationuponpulsedelectricfieldtreatmentinlactobacillusplantarumwcfs1
AT denbestenhmw reversibilityofmembranepermeabilizationuponpulsedelectricfieldtreatmentinlactobacillusplantarumwcfs1