Cargando…

Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information

BACKGROUND: Non-key traits (NKTs) in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) refer to traits other than growth, wood density and stiffness, but still of interest to breeders. Branch-cluster frequency, stem straightness, external resin bleeding and internal checking are examples of such traits and are ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yongjun, Klápště, Jaroslav, Telfer, Emily, Wilcox, Phillip, Graham, Natalie, Macdonald, Lucy, Dungey, Heidi S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31881838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6420-8
_version_ 1783483531842813952
author Li, Yongjun
Klápště, Jaroslav
Telfer, Emily
Wilcox, Phillip
Graham, Natalie
Macdonald, Lucy
Dungey, Heidi S.
author_facet Li, Yongjun
Klápště, Jaroslav
Telfer, Emily
Wilcox, Phillip
Graham, Natalie
Macdonald, Lucy
Dungey, Heidi S.
author_sort Li, Yongjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-key traits (NKTs) in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) refer to traits other than growth, wood density and stiffness, but still of interest to breeders. Branch-cluster frequency, stem straightness, external resin bleeding and internal checking are examples of such traits and are targeted for improvement in radiata pine research programmes. Genomic selection can be conducted before the performance of selection candidates is available so that generation intervals can be reduced. Radiata pine is a species with a long generation interval, which if reduced could significantly increase genetic gain per unit of time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and predictive ability of genomic selection and its efficiency over traditional forward selection in radiata pine for the following NKTs: branch-cluster frequency, stem straightness, internal checking, and external resin bleeding. RESULTS: Nine hundred and eighty-eight individuals were genotyped using exome capture genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and 67,168 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used to develop genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). The documented pedigree was corrected using a subset of 704 SNPs. The percentage of trio parentage confirmed was about 49% and about 50% of parents were re-assigned. The accuracy of GEBVs was 0.55–0.75 when using the documented pedigree and 0.61–0.80 when using the SNP-corrected pedigree. A higher percentage of additive genetic variance was explained and a higher predictive ability was observed when using the SNP-corrected pedigree than using the documented pedigree. With the documented pedigree, genomic selection was similar to traditional forward selection when assuming a generation interval of 17 years, but worse than traditional forward selection when assuming a generation interval of 14 years. After the pedigree was corrected, genomic selection led to 37–115% and 13–77% additional genetic gain over traditional forward selection when generation intervals of 17 years and 14 years were assumed, respectively. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that genomic selection with a pedigree corrected by SNP information was an efficient way of improving non-key traits in radiata pine breeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69351632019-12-30 Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information Li, Yongjun Klápště, Jaroslav Telfer, Emily Wilcox, Phillip Graham, Natalie Macdonald, Lucy Dungey, Heidi S. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-key traits (NKTs) in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) refer to traits other than growth, wood density and stiffness, but still of interest to breeders. Branch-cluster frequency, stem straightness, external resin bleeding and internal checking are examples of such traits and are targeted for improvement in radiata pine research programmes. Genomic selection can be conducted before the performance of selection candidates is available so that generation intervals can be reduced. Radiata pine is a species with a long generation interval, which if reduced could significantly increase genetic gain per unit of time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and predictive ability of genomic selection and its efficiency over traditional forward selection in radiata pine for the following NKTs: branch-cluster frequency, stem straightness, internal checking, and external resin bleeding. RESULTS: Nine hundred and eighty-eight individuals were genotyped using exome capture genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and 67,168 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used to develop genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). The documented pedigree was corrected using a subset of 704 SNPs. The percentage of trio parentage confirmed was about 49% and about 50% of parents were re-assigned. The accuracy of GEBVs was 0.55–0.75 when using the documented pedigree and 0.61–0.80 when using the SNP-corrected pedigree. A higher percentage of additive genetic variance was explained and a higher predictive ability was observed when using the SNP-corrected pedigree than using the documented pedigree. With the documented pedigree, genomic selection was similar to traditional forward selection when assuming a generation interval of 17 years, but worse than traditional forward selection when assuming a generation interval of 14 years. After the pedigree was corrected, genomic selection led to 37–115% and 13–77% additional genetic gain over traditional forward selection when generation intervals of 17 years and 14 years were assumed, respectively. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that genomic selection with a pedigree corrected by SNP information was an efficient way of improving non-key traits in radiata pine breeding. BioMed Central 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6935163/ /pubmed/31881838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6420-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Yongjun
Klápště, Jaroslav
Telfer, Emily
Wilcox, Phillip
Graham, Natalie
Macdonald, Lucy
Dungey, Heidi S.
Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information
title Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information
title_full Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information
title_fullStr Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information
title_full_unstemmed Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information
title_short Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information
title_sort genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using dna marker information
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31881838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6420-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liyongjun genomicselectionfornonkeytraitsinradiatapinewhenthedocumentedpedigreeiscorrectedusingdnamarkerinformation
AT klapstejaroslav genomicselectionfornonkeytraitsinradiatapinewhenthedocumentedpedigreeiscorrectedusingdnamarkerinformation
AT telferemily genomicselectionfornonkeytraitsinradiatapinewhenthedocumentedpedigreeiscorrectedusingdnamarkerinformation
AT wilcoxphillip genomicselectionfornonkeytraitsinradiatapinewhenthedocumentedpedigreeiscorrectedusingdnamarkerinformation
AT grahamnatalie genomicselectionfornonkeytraitsinradiatapinewhenthedocumentedpedigreeiscorrectedusingdnamarkerinformation
AT macdonaldlucy genomicselectionfornonkeytraitsinradiatapinewhenthedocumentedpedigreeiscorrectedusingdnamarkerinformation
AT dungeyheidis genomicselectionfornonkeytraitsinradiatapinewhenthedocumentedpedigreeiscorrectedusingdnamarkerinformation