Cargando…

Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is currently the best approach for complex cases of choledocholithiasis or the cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. Nevertheless, there is no clear consensus on the optimal duct closure method after LCBD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Ancheng, Wu, Jianwu, Qiao, Zhiming, Zhai, Min, Lu, Yijie, Huang, Bo, Jiang, Xinwei, Lu, Xingsheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31857570
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.918743
_version_ 1783483551016026112
author Qin, Ancheng
Wu, Jianwu
Qiao, Zhiming
Zhai, Min
Lu, Yijie
Huang, Bo
Jiang, Xinwei
Lu, Xingsheng
author_facet Qin, Ancheng
Wu, Jianwu
Qiao, Zhiming
Zhai, Min
Lu, Yijie
Huang, Bo
Jiang, Xinwei
Lu, Xingsheng
author_sort Qin, Ancheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is currently the best approach for complex cases of choledocholithiasis or the cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. Nevertheless, there is no clear consensus on the optimal duct closure method after LCBDE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 duct closure methods after LCBDE for choledocholithiasis. MATERIAL/METHODS: In this analysis, 189 patients with choledocholithiasis underwent LCBDE between June 2014 and December 2018. According to different duct closure methods, these patients were divided into T-tube drainage (TTD) group (n=66), common suture group (n=64) and barbed suture group (n=59). The operation time, suturing time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, tube-carried time, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, pre- and post-operative common bile duct (CBD) diameters were all compared among the 3 groups. Six months after discharge, the incidence of complications and recurrent stones was observed. RESULTS: The operation time, suturing time, and amount of intraoperative bleeding in barbed suture group were both significantly less than those in the common suture group and the TTD group (P<0.01). When compared with the TTD group, the suturing time, tube-carried time, and LOS were decreased markedly in the common suture group and the barbed suture group (P<0.01). The post-operative CBD diameters in the 3 groups were all significantly larger than the pre-operative CBD diameters (P<0.01). There was no statistical significance among the 3 groups regarding the incidence of complications and recurrent stones (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Barbed suture shortened the suturing time, operation time, tube-carried time, and LOS, and lessened the amount of intraoperative bleeding in patients with choledocholithiasis after LCBDE. It was more effective than the common suture and TTD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69352462019-12-30 Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis Qin, Ancheng Wu, Jianwu Qiao, Zhiming Zhai, Min Lu, Yijie Huang, Bo Jiang, Xinwei Lu, Xingsheng Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is currently the best approach for complex cases of choledocholithiasis or the cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. Nevertheless, there is no clear consensus on the optimal duct closure method after LCBDE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 duct closure methods after LCBDE for choledocholithiasis. MATERIAL/METHODS: In this analysis, 189 patients with choledocholithiasis underwent LCBDE between June 2014 and December 2018. According to different duct closure methods, these patients were divided into T-tube drainage (TTD) group (n=66), common suture group (n=64) and barbed suture group (n=59). The operation time, suturing time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, tube-carried time, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, pre- and post-operative common bile duct (CBD) diameters were all compared among the 3 groups. Six months after discharge, the incidence of complications and recurrent stones was observed. RESULTS: The operation time, suturing time, and amount of intraoperative bleeding in barbed suture group were both significantly less than those in the common suture group and the TTD group (P<0.01). When compared with the TTD group, the suturing time, tube-carried time, and LOS were decreased markedly in the common suture group and the barbed suture group (P<0.01). The post-operative CBD diameters in the 3 groups were all significantly larger than the pre-operative CBD diameters (P<0.01). There was no statistical significance among the 3 groups regarding the incidence of complications and recurrent stones (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Barbed suture shortened the suturing time, operation time, tube-carried time, and LOS, and lessened the amount of intraoperative bleeding in patients with choledocholithiasis after LCBDE. It was more effective than the common suture and TTD. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6935246/ /pubmed/31857570 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.918743 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2019 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Qin, Ancheng
Wu, Jianwu
Qiao, Zhiming
Zhai, Min
Lu, Yijie
Huang, Bo
Jiang, Xinwei
Lu, Xingsheng
Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis
title Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis
title_full Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis
title_fullStr Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis
title_short Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis
title_sort comparison on the efficacy of three duct closure methods after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31857570
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.918743
work_keys_str_mv AT qinancheng comparisonontheefficacyofthreeductclosuremethodsafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationforcholedocholithiasis
AT wujianwu comparisonontheefficacyofthreeductclosuremethodsafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationforcholedocholithiasis
AT qiaozhiming comparisonontheefficacyofthreeductclosuremethodsafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationforcholedocholithiasis
AT zhaimin comparisonontheefficacyofthreeductclosuremethodsafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationforcholedocholithiasis
AT luyijie comparisonontheefficacyofthreeductclosuremethodsafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationforcholedocholithiasis
AT huangbo comparisonontheefficacyofthreeductclosuremethodsafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationforcholedocholithiasis
AT jiangxinwei comparisonontheefficacyofthreeductclosuremethodsafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationforcholedocholithiasis
AT luxingsheng comparisonontheefficacyofthreeductclosuremethodsafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationforcholedocholithiasis