Cargando…

“No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study

Introduction: Although patient timeliness and appointment flow are highly important for patients and practices, the impact of technology on improving these aspects of healthcare delivery are not widely studied. We evaluated the satisfaction and acceptability of using a handheld internet-enabled tabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Presutti, Richard J, Willis, Floyd B, Scott, Ruel, Greig, Hope E, Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890436
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6238
_version_ 1783483567458746368
author Presutti, Richard J
Willis, Floyd B
Scott, Ruel
Greig, Hope E
Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain
author_facet Presutti, Richard J
Willis, Floyd B
Scott, Ruel
Greig, Hope E
Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain
author_sort Presutti, Richard J
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Although patient timeliness and appointment flow are highly important for patients and practices, the impact of technology on improving these aspects of healthcare delivery are not widely studied. We evaluated the satisfaction and acceptability of using a handheld internet-enabled tablet computer (the Mobile Patient Communicator (MPC)) that uses interactive maps, and visual and written instructions to direct patients from waiting rooms to exam rooms independently of medical personnel. Methods: At the time of appointment check-in, eligible patients attending their healthcare appointments at a family medicine practice received the MPC that provided them an online orientation about its use and function. The MPC directed patients to their assigned exam rooms. Patients completed pre-/post-visit surveys. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for numeric variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Results: Among 200 participated patients, the median level of satisfaction was 9 (1=not at all, 10= very much satisfied), 177 (91%) were successful in finding their room, and 147 (76%) thought the device should be used in the future. Prior to using the MPC, patients ≥65 years old were less comfortable with using the device (median 7 vs. 9; P=0.001), expected to have more problems operating the device (yes 6% vs. 1%; P=0.002), and were less likely to use a computer daily (yes 51% vs. 91%; P<0.001) vs. <65 years old. After using the MPC, patients ≥65 years old were less satisfied with using the device (median 8 vs. 10; P=0.001) but were more likely to watch the video on the device (yes 70% vs. 54%; P=0.04) vs. <65 years old.  Conclusion: The pilot results show evidence that using this technology for self-rooming by patients is highly acceptable regardless of age and sex. The findings also indicate this technology was helpful in delivering health care-related information before face-to-face appointments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69353322019-12-30 “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study Presutti, Richard J Willis, Floyd B Scott, Ruel Greig, Hope E Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain Cureus Quality Improvement Introduction: Although patient timeliness and appointment flow are highly important for patients and practices, the impact of technology on improving these aspects of healthcare delivery are not widely studied. We evaluated the satisfaction and acceptability of using a handheld internet-enabled tablet computer (the Mobile Patient Communicator (MPC)) that uses interactive maps, and visual and written instructions to direct patients from waiting rooms to exam rooms independently of medical personnel. Methods: At the time of appointment check-in, eligible patients attending their healthcare appointments at a family medicine practice received the MPC that provided them an online orientation about its use and function. The MPC directed patients to their assigned exam rooms. Patients completed pre-/post-visit surveys. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for numeric variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Results: Among 200 participated patients, the median level of satisfaction was 9 (1=not at all, 10= very much satisfied), 177 (91%) were successful in finding their room, and 147 (76%) thought the device should be used in the future. Prior to using the MPC, patients ≥65 years old were less comfortable with using the device (median 7 vs. 9; P=0.001), expected to have more problems operating the device (yes 6% vs. 1%; P=0.002), and were less likely to use a computer daily (yes 51% vs. 91%; P<0.001) vs. <65 years old. After using the MPC, patients ≥65 years old were less satisfied with using the device (median 8 vs. 10; P=0.001) but were more likely to watch the video on the device (yes 70% vs. 54%; P=0.04) vs. <65 years old.  Conclusion: The pilot results show evidence that using this technology for self-rooming by patients is highly acceptable regardless of age and sex. The findings also indicate this technology was helpful in delivering health care-related information before face-to-face appointments. Cureus 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6935332/ /pubmed/31890436 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6238 Text en Copyright © 2019, Presutti et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Presutti, Richard J
Willis, Floyd B
Scott, Ruel
Greig, Hope E
Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain
“No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study
title “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study
title_full “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study
title_fullStr “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study
title_short “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study
title_sort “no waiting” in the “waiting room”: the self-rooming patient pilot study
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890436
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6238
work_keys_str_mv AT presuttirichardj nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy
AT willisfloydb nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy
AT scottruel nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy
AT greighopee nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy
AT abudabrhabdmoain nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy