Cargando…
“No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study
Introduction: Although patient timeliness and appointment flow are highly important for patients and practices, the impact of technology on improving these aspects of healthcare delivery are not widely studied. We evaluated the satisfaction and acceptability of using a handheld internet-enabled tabl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890436 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6238 |
_version_ | 1783483567458746368 |
---|---|
author | Presutti, Richard J Willis, Floyd B Scott, Ruel Greig, Hope E Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain |
author_facet | Presutti, Richard J Willis, Floyd B Scott, Ruel Greig, Hope E Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain |
author_sort | Presutti, Richard J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Although patient timeliness and appointment flow are highly important for patients and practices, the impact of technology on improving these aspects of healthcare delivery are not widely studied. We evaluated the satisfaction and acceptability of using a handheld internet-enabled tablet computer (the Mobile Patient Communicator (MPC)) that uses interactive maps, and visual and written instructions to direct patients from waiting rooms to exam rooms independently of medical personnel. Methods: At the time of appointment check-in, eligible patients attending their healthcare appointments at a family medicine practice received the MPC that provided them an online orientation about its use and function. The MPC directed patients to their assigned exam rooms. Patients completed pre-/post-visit surveys. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for numeric variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Results: Among 200 participated patients, the median level of satisfaction was 9 (1=not at all, 10= very much satisfied), 177 (91%) were successful in finding their room, and 147 (76%) thought the device should be used in the future. Prior to using the MPC, patients ≥65 years old were less comfortable with using the device (median 7 vs. 9; P=0.001), expected to have more problems operating the device (yes 6% vs. 1%; P=0.002), and were less likely to use a computer daily (yes 51% vs. 91%; P<0.001) vs. <65 years old. After using the MPC, patients ≥65 years old were less satisfied with using the device (median 8 vs. 10; P=0.001) but were more likely to watch the video on the device (yes 70% vs. 54%; P=0.04) vs. <65 years old. Conclusion: The pilot results show evidence that using this technology for self-rooming by patients is highly acceptable regardless of age and sex. The findings also indicate this technology was helpful in delivering health care-related information before face-to-face appointments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6935332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69353322019-12-30 “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study Presutti, Richard J Willis, Floyd B Scott, Ruel Greig, Hope E Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain Cureus Quality Improvement Introduction: Although patient timeliness and appointment flow are highly important for patients and practices, the impact of technology on improving these aspects of healthcare delivery are not widely studied. We evaluated the satisfaction and acceptability of using a handheld internet-enabled tablet computer (the Mobile Patient Communicator (MPC)) that uses interactive maps, and visual and written instructions to direct patients from waiting rooms to exam rooms independently of medical personnel. Methods: At the time of appointment check-in, eligible patients attending their healthcare appointments at a family medicine practice received the MPC that provided them an online orientation about its use and function. The MPC directed patients to their assigned exam rooms. Patients completed pre-/post-visit surveys. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for numeric variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Results: Among 200 participated patients, the median level of satisfaction was 9 (1=not at all, 10= very much satisfied), 177 (91%) were successful in finding their room, and 147 (76%) thought the device should be used in the future. Prior to using the MPC, patients ≥65 years old were less comfortable with using the device (median 7 vs. 9; P=0.001), expected to have more problems operating the device (yes 6% vs. 1%; P=0.002), and were less likely to use a computer daily (yes 51% vs. 91%; P<0.001) vs. <65 years old. After using the MPC, patients ≥65 years old were less satisfied with using the device (median 8 vs. 10; P=0.001) but were more likely to watch the video on the device (yes 70% vs. 54%; P=0.04) vs. <65 years old. Conclusion: The pilot results show evidence that using this technology for self-rooming by patients is highly acceptable regardless of age and sex. The findings also indicate this technology was helpful in delivering health care-related information before face-to-face appointments. Cureus 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6935332/ /pubmed/31890436 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6238 Text en Copyright © 2019, Presutti et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Presutti, Richard J Willis, Floyd B Scott, Ruel Greig, Hope E Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study |
title | “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study |
title_full | “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study |
title_short | “No Waiting” in the “Waiting Room”: The Self-rooming Patient Pilot Study |
title_sort | “no waiting” in the “waiting room”: the self-rooming patient pilot study |
topic | Quality Improvement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890436 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT presuttirichardj nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy AT willisfloydb nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy AT scottruel nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy AT greighopee nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy AT abudabrhabdmoain nowaitinginthewaitingroomtheselfroomingpatientpilotstudy |