Cargando…

Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)

BACKGROUND: Research priority setting with stakeholders can help direct the limited resources for health research toward priority areas of need. Ensuring transparency of the priority setting process can strengthen legitimacy and credibility for influencing the research agenda. This study aims to dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tong, Allison, Synnot, Anneliese, Crowe, Sally, Hill, Sophie, Matus, Andrea, Scholes-Robertson, Nicole, Oliver, Sandy, Cowan, Katherine, Nasser, Mona, Bhaumik, Soumyadeep, Gutman, Talia, Baumgart, Amanda, Craig, Jonathan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3
_version_ 1783483581378592768
author Tong, Allison
Synnot, Anneliese
Crowe, Sally
Hill, Sophie
Matus, Andrea
Scholes-Robertson, Nicole
Oliver, Sandy
Cowan, Katherine
Nasser, Mona
Bhaumik, Soumyadeep
Gutman, Talia
Baumgart, Amanda
Craig, Jonathan C.
author_facet Tong, Allison
Synnot, Anneliese
Crowe, Sally
Hill, Sophie
Matus, Andrea
Scholes-Robertson, Nicole
Oliver, Sandy
Cowan, Katherine
Nasser, Mona
Bhaumik, Soumyadeep
Gutman, Talia
Baumgart, Amanda
Craig, Jonathan C.
author_sort Tong, Allison
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research priority setting with stakeholders can help direct the limited resources for health research toward priority areas of need. Ensuring transparency of the priority setting process can strengthen legitimacy and credibility for influencing the research agenda. This study aims to develop a reporting guideline for priority setting of health research. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and relevant websites for sources (frameworks, guidelines, or models for conducting, appraising, reporting or evaluating health research priority setting, and reviews (including systematic reviews)), and primary studies of research priority setting to July 2019. We inductively developed a list of reporting items and piloted the preliminary guideline with a diverse range of 30 priority setting studies from the records retrieved. RESULTS: From 21,556 records, we included 26 sources for the candidate REPRISE framework and 455 primary research studies. The REporting guideline for PRIority SEtting of health research (REPRISE) has 31 reporting items that cover 10 domains: context and scope, governance and team, framework for priority setting, stakeholders/participants, identification and collection of priorities, prioritization of research topics, output, evaluation and feedback, translation and implementation, and funding and conflict of interest. Each reporting item includes a descriptor and examples. CONCLUSIONS: The REPRISE guideline can facilitate comprehensive reporting of studies of research priority setting. Improved transparency in research priority setting may strengthen the acceptability and implementation of the research priorities identified, so that efforts and funding are invested in generating evidence that is of importance to all stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69354712019-12-30 Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE) Tong, Allison Synnot, Anneliese Crowe, Sally Hill, Sophie Matus, Andrea Scholes-Robertson, Nicole Oliver, Sandy Cowan, Katherine Nasser, Mona Bhaumik, Soumyadeep Gutman, Talia Baumgart, Amanda Craig, Jonathan C. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Research priority setting with stakeholders can help direct the limited resources for health research toward priority areas of need. Ensuring transparency of the priority setting process can strengthen legitimacy and credibility for influencing the research agenda. This study aims to develop a reporting guideline for priority setting of health research. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and relevant websites for sources (frameworks, guidelines, or models for conducting, appraising, reporting or evaluating health research priority setting, and reviews (including systematic reviews)), and primary studies of research priority setting to July 2019. We inductively developed a list of reporting items and piloted the preliminary guideline with a diverse range of 30 priority setting studies from the records retrieved. RESULTS: From 21,556 records, we included 26 sources for the candidate REPRISE framework and 455 primary research studies. The REporting guideline for PRIority SEtting of health research (REPRISE) has 31 reporting items that cover 10 domains: context and scope, governance and team, framework for priority setting, stakeholders/participants, identification and collection of priorities, prioritization of research topics, output, evaluation and feedback, translation and implementation, and funding and conflict of interest. Each reporting item includes a descriptor and examples. CONCLUSIONS: The REPRISE guideline can facilitate comprehensive reporting of studies of research priority setting. Improved transparency in research priority setting may strengthen the acceptability and implementation of the research priorities identified, so that efforts and funding are invested in generating evidence that is of importance to all stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. BioMed Central 2019-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6935471/ /pubmed/31883517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tong, Allison
Synnot, Anneliese
Crowe, Sally
Hill, Sophie
Matus, Andrea
Scholes-Robertson, Nicole
Oliver, Sandy
Cowan, Katherine
Nasser, Mona
Bhaumik, Soumyadeep
Gutman, Talia
Baumgart, Amanda
Craig, Jonathan C.
Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
title Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
title_full Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
title_fullStr Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
title_full_unstemmed Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
title_short Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
title_sort reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (reprise)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tongallison reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT synnotanneliese reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT crowesally reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT hillsophie reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT matusandrea reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT scholesrobertsonnicole reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT oliversandy reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT cowankatherine reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT nassermona reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT bhaumiksoumyadeep reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT gutmantalia reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT baumgartamanda reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise
AT craigjonathanc reportingguidelineforprioritysettingofhealthresearchreprise