Cargando…

The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis

BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase is a key component of treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in the UK. Commonly used forms of asparaginase are native E. coli-derived asparaginase (native asparaginase) and pegaspargase in first-line combination therapy, and native Erwinia chrysan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xingdi, Wildman, Kingsley P., Basu, Subham, Lin, Peggy L., Rowntree, Clare, Saha, Vaskar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0257-3
_version_ 1783483581631299584
author Hu, Xingdi
Wildman, Kingsley P.
Basu, Subham
Lin, Peggy L.
Rowntree, Clare
Saha, Vaskar
author_facet Hu, Xingdi
Wildman, Kingsley P.
Basu, Subham
Lin, Peggy L.
Rowntree, Clare
Saha, Vaskar
author_sort Hu, Xingdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase is a key component of treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in the UK. Commonly used forms of asparaginase are native E. coli-derived asparaginase (native asparaginase) and pegaspargase in first-line combination therapy, and native Erwinia chrysanthemi-derived asparaginase (Erwinia asparaginase) as second-line treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in first-line combination therapy for patients with newly diagnosed ALL. A combined decision tree and health-state transition Markov cost-effectiveness model was developed to assess the relative costs and health outcomes of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in the UK setting. RESULTS: In base case analyses, first-line pegaspargase (followed by Erwinia asparaginase in cases of hypersensitivity) dominated first-line native asparaginase followed by Erwinia asparaginase; i.e. resulted in lower costs and more quality-adjusted life year gain. The favourable hypersensitivity rates and administration profile of pegaspargase led to lifetime cost savings of £4741 versus native asparaginase. Pegaspargase remained cost-effective versus all treatment strategies in all scenario analyses, including use of the 2500 IU/m(2) dose, recommended for patients ≤21 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Pegaspargase, as part of multi-drug chemotherapy, is a cost-effective option for the treatment of newly diagnosed ALL. Based on this study, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal Committee concluded that it could recommend pegaspargase as a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources in England & Wales for treating ALL in children, young people and adults with untreated, newly diagnosed disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKALL 2011, EudraCT number 2010-020924-22; UKALL 2003, EudraCT number 2007-004013-34; UKALL14, EudraCT number 2009-012717-22.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69354722019-12-30 The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis Hu, Xingdi Wildman, Kingsley P. Basu, Subham Lin, Peggy L. Rowntree, Clare Saha, Vaskar Health Econ Rev Research BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase is a key component of treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in the UK. Commonly used forms of asparaginase are native E. coli-derived asparaginase (native asparaginase) and pegaspargase in first-line combination therapy, and native Erwinia chrysanthemi-derived asparaginase (Erwinia asparaginase) as second-line treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in first-line combination therapy for patients with newly diagnosed ALL. A combined decision tree and health-state transition Markov cost-effectiveness model was developed to assess the relative costs and health outcomes of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in the UK setting. RESULTS: In base case analyses, first-line pegaspargase (followed by Erwinia asparaginase in cases of hypersensitivity) dominated first-line native asparaginase followed by Erwinia asparaginase; i.e. resulted in lower costs and more quality-adjusted life year gain. The favourable hypersensitivity rates and administration profile of pegaspargase led to lifetime cost savings of £4741 versus native asparaginase. Pegaspargase remained cost-effective versus all treatment strategies in all scenario analyses, including use of the 2500 IU/m(2) dose, recommended for patients ≤21 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Pegaspargase, as part of multi-drug chemotherapy, is a cost-effective option for the treatment of newly diagnosed ALL. Based on this study, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal Committee concluded that it could recommend pegaspargase as a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources in England & Wales for treating ALL in children, young people and adults with untreated, newly diagnosed disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKALL 2011, EudraCT number 2010-020924-22; UKALL 2003, EudraCT number 2007-004013-34; UKALL14, EudraCT number 2009-012717-22. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6935472/ /pubmed/31885053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0257-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Xingdi
Wildman, Kingsley P.
Basu, Subham
Lin, Peggy L.
Rowntree, Clare
Saha, Vaskar
The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis
title The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis
title_full The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis
title_fullStr The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis
title_short The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis
title_sort cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a uk-based cost-utility analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0257-3
work_keys_str_mv AT huxingdi thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT wildmankingsleyp thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT basusubham thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT linpeggyl thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT rowntreeclare thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT sahavaskar thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT huxingdi costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT wildmankingsleyp costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT basusubham costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT linpeggyl costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT rowntreeclare costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis
AT sahavaskar costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis