Cargando…
The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis
BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase is a key component of treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in the UK. Commonly used forms of asparaginase are native E. coli-derived asparaginase (native asparaginase) and pegaspargase in first-line combination therapy, and native Erwinia chrysan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0257-3 |
_version_ | 1783483581631299584 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Xingdi Wildman, Kingsley P. Basu, Subham Lin, Peggy L. Rowntree, Clare Saha, Vaskar |
author_facet | Hu, Xingdi Wildman, Kingsley P. Basu, Subham Lin, Peggy L. Rowntree, Clare Saha, Vaskar |
author_sort | Hu, Xingdi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase is a key component of treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in the UK. Commonly used forms of asparaginase are native E. coli-derived asparaginase (native asparaginase) and pegaspargase in first-line combination therapy, and native Erwinia chrysanthemi-derived asparaginase (Erwinia asparaginase) as second-line treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in first-line combination therapy for patients with newly diagnosed ALL. A combined decision tree and health-state transition Markov cost-effectiveness model was developed to assess the relative costs and health outcomes of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in the UK setting. RESULTS: In base case analyses, first-line pegaspargase (followed by Erwinia asparaginase in cases of hypersensitivity) dominated first-line native asparaginase followed by Erwinia asparaginase; i.e. resulted in lower costs and more quality-adjusted life year gain. The favourable hypersensitivity rates and administration profile of pegaspargase led to lifetime cost savings of £4741 versus native asparaginase. Pegaspargase remained cost-effective versus all treatment strategies in all scenario analyses, including use of the 2500 IU/m(2) dose, recommended for patients ≤21 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Pegaspargase, as part of multi-drug chemotherapy, is a cost-effective option for the treatment of newly diagnosed ALL. Based on this study, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal Committee concluded that it could recommend pegaspargase as a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources in England & Wales for treating ALL in children, young people and adults with untreated, newly diagnosed disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKALL 2011, EudraCT number 2010-020924-22; UKALL 2003, EudraCT number 2007-004013-34; UKALL14, EudraCT number 2009-012717-22. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6935472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69354722019-12-30 The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis Hu, Xingdi Wildman, Kingsley P. Basu, Subham Lin, Peggy L. Rowntree, Clare Saha, Vaskar Health Econ Rev Research BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase is a key component of treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in the UK. Commonly used forms of asparaginase are native E. coli-derived asparaginase (native asparaginase) and pegaspargase in first-line combination therapy, and native Erwinia chrysanthemi-derived asparaginase (Erwinia asparaginase) as second-line treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in first-line combination therapy for patients with newly diagnosed ALL. A combined decision tree and health-state transition Markov cost-effectiveness model was developed to assess the relative costs and health outcomes of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in the UK setting. RESULTS: In base case analyses, first-line pegaspargase (followed by Erwinia asparaginase in cases of hypersensitivity) dominated first-line native asparaginase followed by Erwinia asparaginase; i.e. resulted in lower costs and more quality-adjusted life year gain. The favourable hypersensitivity rates and administration profile of pegaspargase led to lifetime cost savings of £4741 versus native asparaginase. Pegaspargase remained cost-effective versus all treatment strategies in all scenario analyses, including use of the 2500 IU/m(2) dose, recommended for patients ≤21 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Pegaspargase, as part of multi-drug chemotherapy, is a cost-effective option for the treatment of newly diagnosed ALL. Based on this study, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal Committee concluded that it could recommend pegaspargase as a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources in England & Wales for treating ALL in children, young people and adults with untreated, newly diagnosed disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKALL 2011, EudraCT number 2010-020924-22; UKALL 2003, EudraCT number 2007-004013-34; UKALL14, EudraCT number 2009-012717-22. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6935472/ /pubmed/31885053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0257-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Hu, Xingdi Wildman, Kingsley P. Basu, Subham Lin, Peggy L. Rowntree, Clare Saha, Vaskar The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis |
title | The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis |
title_full | The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis |
title_fullStr | The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis |
title_short | The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK-based cost-utility analysis |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a uk-based cost-utility analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0257-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huxingdi thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT wildmankingsleyp thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT basusubham thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT linpeggyl thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT rowntreeclare thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT sahavaskar thecosteffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT huxingdi costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT wildmankingsleyp costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT basusubham costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT linpeggyl costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT rowntreeclare costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis AT sahavaskar costeffectivenessofpegaspargaseversusnativeasparaginaseforfirstlinetreatmentofacutelymphoblasticleukaemiaaukbasedcostutilityanalysis |