Cargando…

Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the patient safety culture in Chinese hospitals. This study aims to assess the patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital and to identify opportunities for improving the organization’s safety culture. METHODS: A cross-sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Xiyao, Song, Yuqin, Dennis, Christine, Slovensky, Donna J., Wei, Lim Yee, Chen, Jie, Ji, Jiafu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4837-z
_version_ 1783483587642785792
author Zhong, Xiyao
Song, Yuqin
Dennis, Christine
Slovensky, Donna J.
Wei, Lim Yee
Chen, Jie
Ji, Jiafu
author_facet Zhong, Xiyao
Song, Yuqin
Dennis, Christine
Slovensky, Donna J.
Wei, Lim Yee
Chen, Jie
Ji, Jiafu
author_sort Zhong, Xiyao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the patient safety culture in Chinese hospitals. This study aims to assess the patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital and to identify opportunities for improving the organization’s safety culture. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in April 2018 and 2019, respectively. Data on patient safety culture were collected from clinical and administrative staffs using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). RESULTS: Twelve composite dimension variables were hierarchically clustered. Three highest positive response dimensions include ‘Organizational Learning and continuous improvement’ (92.9%), ‘Teamwork within units’ (89.7%), and ‘Hospital management support for patient safety’ (83.7%), while 3 lowest positive response dimensions included ‘Frequency of events reported’ (43.9%), ‘Non-punitive response to error’ (51.1%), ‘Communication openness’ (52.2%), and ‘Staffing’ (53.7%). Compared to the average scores of the United States, the scores of the Peking University Cancer Hospital was significantly lower on ‘Communication openness’ and ‘Frequency of events reported’. After targeted continuous improvement based on results in 2018, all 12 dimensions surprisingly increased in the safety culture conducted in 2019. CONCLUSION: Inadequate feedback and communications about error and lack of communication openness are key challenges for patient safety in the delivery of care in this hospital. Results of this baseline survey indicate the need for a modified approach and attention to context when designing interventions aimed at improving the safety culture in this organization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69354972019-12-30 Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement Zhong, Xiyao Song, Yuqin Dennis, Christine Slovensky, Donna J. Wei, Lim Yee Chen, Jie Ji, Jiafu BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the patient safety culture in Chinese hospitals. This study aims to assess the patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital and to identify opportunities for improving the organization’s safety culture. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in April 2018 and 2019, respectively. Data on patient safety culture were collected from clinical and administrative staffs using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). RESULTS: Twelve composite dimension variables were hierarchically clustered. Three highest positive response dimensions include ‘Organizational Learning and continuous improvement’ (92.9%), ‘Teamwork within units’ (89.7%), and ‘Hospital management support for patient safety’ (83.7%), while 3 lowest positive response dimensions included ‘Frequency of events reported’ (43.9%), ‘Non-punitive response to error’ (51.1%), ‘Communication openness’ (52.2%), and ‘Staffing’ (53.7%). Compared to the average scores of the United States, the scores of the Peking University Cancer Hospital was significantly lower on ‘Communication openness’ and ‘Frequency of events reported’. After targeted continuous improvement based on results in 2018, all 12 dimensions surprisingly increased in the safety culture conducted in 2019. CONCLUSION: Inadequate feedback and communications about error and lack of communication openness are key challenges for patient safety in the delivery of care in this hospital. Results of this baseline survey indicate the need for a modified approach and attention to context when designing interventions aimed at improving the safety culture in this organization. BioMed Central 2019-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6935497/ /pubmed/31883512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4837-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhong, Xiyao
Song, Yuqin
Dennis, Christine
Slovensky, Donna J.
Wei, Lim Yee
Chen, Jie
Ji, Jiafu
Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement
title Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement
title_full Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement
title_fullStr Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement
title_full_unstemmed Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement
title_short Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement
title_sort patient safety culture in peking university cancer hospital in china: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4837-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongxiyao patientsafetycultureinpekinguniversitycancerhospitalinchinabaselineassessmentandcomparativeanalysisforqualityimprovement
AT songyuqin patientsafetycultureinpekinguniversitycancerhospitalinchinabaselineassessmentandcomparativeanalysisforqualityimprovement
AT dennischristine patientsafetycultureinpekinguniversitycancerhospitalinchinabaselineassessmentandcomparativeanalysisforqualityimprovement
AT slovenskydonnaj patientsafetycultureinpekinguniversitycancerhospitalinchinabaselineassessmentandcomparativeanalysisforqualityimprovement
AT weilimyee patientsafetycultureinpekinguniversitycancerhospitalinchinabaselineassessmentandcomparativeanalysisforqualityimprovement
AT chenjie patientsafetycultureinpekinguniversitycancerhospitalinchinabaselineassessmentandcomparativeanalysisforqualityimprovement
AT jijiafu patientsafetycultureinpekinguniversitycancerhospitalinchinabaselineassessmentandcomparativeanalysisforqualityimprovement