Cargando…

Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists

BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are the latest addition to a list of professional competencies that pharmacy educational organizations support, and accreditation organizations require, for assessment by colleges and schools of pharmacy. OBJECTIVE: The study’s objective is to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, David M., Kelsch, Michael P., Hanel, Macey, Friesner, Daniel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897256
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1607
_version_ 1783483590459260928
author Scott, David M.
Kelsch, Michael P.
Hanel, Macey
Friesner, Daniel L.
author_facet Scott, David M.
Kelsch, Michael P.
Hanel, Macey
Friesner, Daniel L.
author_sort Scott, David M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are the latest addition to a list of professional competencies that pharmacy educational organizations support, and accreditation organizations require, for assessment by colleges and schools of pharmacy. OBJECTIVE: The study’s objective is to assess the use of Core EPAs in the patient care domain (by practice setting, position, and preceptor status) in contemporary pharmacy practice. METHODS: This survey assessed the EPA activities of pharmacists practicing in North Dakota. The pharmacists were asked “how many times in the past 30 days have you delivered the following services in your practice setting?” Response options were: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more times. RESULTS: Of 990 potential respondents, 457 pharmacists (46.1%) returned a survey, and 107 (10.8%) answered every survey item in the patient care domain. Respondents reported that the highest rated activity items “Collect information to identify a patient’s medication-related problems and health-related needs,” and “Analyze information to determine the effects of medication therapy, identify medication-related problems, and prioritize health-related needs” were performed an average of 3.9 times per week (SD=1.8), and 3.8 times per week (SD=2.0), respectively. Both of these items, were reported for 70% of the respondents at 5 or more times per week. For these items, the highest reported practice setting was ‘other’ practice settings (e.g., long-term care, community health centers) followed by chains, hospitals, and independent pharmacies. By position, clinical pharmacists and preceptors reported the highest activity levels for most EPAs and supportive example tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence suggesting (but not proving) that EPAs have potential as a means to assess outcomes in pharmacy education and practice. Our study sets the stage for future work that further refines and assesses core EPA activities and supportive example tasks to measure the impact of how this process relates to outcomes of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69355412020-01-02 Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists Scott, David M. Kelsch, Michael P. Hanel, Macey Friesner, Daniel L. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are the latest addition to a list of professional competencies that pharmacy educational organizations support, and accreditation organizations require, for assessment by colleges and schools of pharmacy. OBJECTIVE: The study’s objective is to assess the use of Core EPAs in the patient care domain (by practice setting, position, and preceptor status) in contemporary pharmacy practice. METHODS: This survey assessed the EPA activities of pharmacists practicing in North Dakota. The pharmacists were asked “how many times in the past 30 days have you delivered the following services in your practice setting?” Response options were: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more times. RESULTS: Of 990 potential respondents, 457 pharmacists (46.1%) returned a survey, and 107 (10.8%) answered every survey item in the patient care domain. Respondents reported that the highest rated activity items “Collect information to identify a patient’s medication-related problems and health-related needs,” and “Analyze information to determine the effects of medication therapy, identify medication-related problems, and prioritize health-related needs” were performed an average of 3.9 times per week (SD=1.8), and 3.8 times per week (SD=2.0), respectively. Both of these items, were reported for 70% of the respondents at 5 or more times per week. For these items, the highest reported practice setting was ‘other’ practice settings (e.g., long-term care, community health centers) followed by chains, hospitals, and independent pharmacies. By position, clinical pharmacists and preceptors reported the highest activity levels for most EPAs and supportive example tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence suggesting (but not proving) that EPAs have potential as a means to assess outcomes in pharmacy education and practice. Our study sets the stage for future work that further refines and assesses core EPA activities and supportive example tasks to measure the impact of how this process relates to outcomes of care. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2019 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6935541/ /pubmed/31897256 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1607 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Scott, David M.
Kelsch, Michael P.
Hanel, Macey
Friesner, Daniel L.
Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists
title Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists
title_full Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists
title_fullStr Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists
title_full_unstemmed Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists
title_short Appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) patient care provider domain by North Dakota pharmacists
title_sort appraisal of the entrustable professional activities (epas) patient care provider domain by north dakota pharmacists
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897256
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1607
work_keys_str_mv AT scottdavidm appraisaloftheentrustableprofessionalactivitiesepaspatientcareproviderdomainbynorthdakotapharmacists
AT kelschmichaelp appraisaloftheentrustableprofessionalactivitiesepaspatientcareproviderdomainbynorthdakotapharmacists
AT hanelmacey appraisaloftheentrustableprofessionalactivitiesepaspatientcareproviderdomainbynorthdakotapharmacists
AT friesnerdaniell appraisaloftheentrustableprofessionalactivitiesepaspatientcareproviderdomainbynorthdakotapharmacists