Cargando…

Misdiagnosis of Mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis

SUMMARY: Primary amenorrhea could be caused by disorders of four parts: disorders of the outflow tract, disorders of the ovary, disorders of the anterior pituitary, and disorders of hypothalamus. Delay in diagnosis and hormone substitution therapy causes secondary osteoporosis. Herein, we report a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon, Veerasomboonsin, Veekij, Nakasatien, Soontaree, Krittiyawong, Sirinate, Himathongkam, Thep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31809259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-19-0122
_version_ 1783483620840701952
author Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon
Veerasomboonsin, Veekij
Nakasatien, Soontaree
Krittiyawong, Sirinate
Himathongkam, Thep
author_facet Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon
Veerasomboonsin, Veekij
Nakasatien, Soontaree
Krittiyawong, Sirinate
Himathongkam, Thep
author_sort Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Primary amenorrhea could be caused by disorders of four parts: disorders of the outflow tract, disorders of the ovary, disorders of the anterior pituitary, and disorders of hypothalamus. Delay in diagnosis and hormone substitution therapy causes secondary osteoporosis. Herein, we report a case of a 23-year-old phenotypical female who presented with primary amenorrhea from 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis but had been misdiagnosed as Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome or Mullerian agenesis. The coexistence of gonadal dysgenesis and MRKH was suspected after laboratory and imaging investigations. However, the vanishing uterus reappeared after 18 months of hormone replacement therapy. Therefore, hormone profiles and karyotype should be thoroughly investigated to distinguish MRKH syndrome from other disorders of sex development (DSD). Double diagnosis of DSD is extremely rare and periodic evaluation should be reassessed. This case highlights the presence of estrogen deficiency state, the uterus may remain invisible until adequate exposure to exogenous estrogen. LEARNING POINTS: An early diagnosis of disorders of sex development (DSD) is extremely important in order to promptly begin treatment, provide emotional support to the patient and reduce the risks of associated complications. Hormone profiles and karyotype should be investigated in all cases of the presumptive diagnosis of Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome or Mullerian agenesis. The association between 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis and Mullerian agenesis has been occasionally reported as a co-incidental event; however, reassessment of the presence of uterus should be done again after administration of exogenous estrogen replacement for at least 6–12 months. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for patients presenting with DSD to ensure appropriate treatments and follow-up across the lifespan of individuals with DSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69357112020-01-06 Misdiagnosis of Mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon Veerasomboonsin, Veekij Nakasatien, Soontaree Krittiyawong, Sirinate Himathongkam, Thep Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats SUMMARY: Primary amenorrhea could be caused by disorders of four parts: disorders of the outflow tract, disorders of the ovary, disorders of the anterior pituitary, and disorders of hypothalamus. Delay in diagnosis and hormone substitution therapy causes secondary osteoporosis. Herein, we report a case of a 23-year-old phenotypical female who presented with primary amenorrhea from 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis but had been misdiagnosed as Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome or Mullerian agenesis. The coexistence of gonadal dysgenesis and MRKH was suspected after laboratory and imaging investigations. However, the vanishing uterus reappeared after 18 months of hormone replacement therapy. Therefore, hormone profiles and karyotype should be thoroughly investigated to distinguish MRKH syndrome from other disorders of sex development (DSD). Double diagnosis of DSD is extremely rare and periodic evaluation should be reassessed. This case highlights the presence of estrogen deficiency state, the uterus may remain invisible until adequate exposure to exogenous estrogen. LEARNING POINTS: An early diagnosis of disorders of sex development (DSD) is extremely important in order to promptly begin treatment, provide emotional support to the patient and reduce the risks of associated complications. Hormone profiles and karyotype should be investigated in all cases of the presumptive diagnosis of Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome or Mullerian agenesis. The association between 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis and Mullerian agenesis has been occasionally reported as a co-incidental event; however, reassessment of the presence of uterus should be done again after administration of exogenous estrogen replacement for at least 6–12 months. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for patients presenting with DSD to ensure appropriate treatments and follow-up across the lifespan of individuals with DSD. Bioscientifica Ltd 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6935711/ /pubmed/31809259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-19-0122 Text en © 2019 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats
Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon
Veerasomboonsin, Veekij
Nakasatien, Soontaree
Krittiyawong, Sirinate
Himathongkam, Thep
Misdiagnosis of Mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis
title Misdiagnosis of Mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis
title_full Misdiagnosis of Mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis
title_fullStr Misdiagnosis of Mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Misdiagnosis of Mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis
title_short Misdiagnosis of Mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis
title_sort misdiagnosis of mullerian agenesis in a patient with 46, xx gonadal dysgenesis: a missed opportunity for prevention of osteoporosis
topic Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31809259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-19-0122
work_keys_str_mv AT thewjitcharoenyotsapon misdiagnosisofmullerianagenesisinapatientwith46xxgonadaldysgenesisamissedopportunityforpreventionofosteoporosis
AT veerasomboonsinveekij misdiagnosisofmullerianagenesisinapatientwith46xxgonadaldysgenesisamissedopportunityforpreventionofosteoporosis
AT nakasatiensoontaree misdiagnosisofmullerianagenesisinapatientwith46xxgonadaldysgenesisamissedopportunityforpreventionofosteoporosis
AT krittiyawongsirinate misdiagnosisofmullerianagenesisinapatientwith46xxgonadaldysgenesisamissedopportunityforpreventionofosteoporosis
AT himathongkamthep misdiagnosisofmullerianagenesisinapatientwith46xxgonadaldysgenesisamissedopportunityforpreventionofosteoporosis