Cargando…

Comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: A review of 2352 elective cases

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly performed procedure to address cervical myeloradiculopathy. However, 30-day outcomes after additional plating/instrumentation are not very clear. METHODS: The authors reviewed The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Seokchun, Haider, Sameah, Zakaria, Hesham, Chang, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893147
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_513_2019
_version_ 1783483658382868480
author Lim, Seokchun
Haider, Sameah
Zakaria, Hesham
Chang, Victor
author_facet Lim, Seokchun
Haider, Sameah
Zakaria, Hesham
Chang, Victor
author_sort Lim, Seokchun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly performed procedure to address cervical myeloradiculopathy. However, 30-day outcomes after additional plating/instrumentation are not very clear. METHODS: The authors reviewed The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify all elective ACDF cases with or without instrumentation for patients having cervical spondylosis with or without myelopathy from 2011 to 2013 using current procedural terminology and International Classification of Disease-9 codes. We identified 2352 cases and subdivided these into two cohorts based on instrumentation procedures (588 cases without instrumentation and 1764 cases with instrumentation). Baseline differences in two cohorts were adjusted by propensity score matching analysis, yielding well-matched 583 pairs. RESULTS: Following propensity matching, the authors observed no significant difference in 30-day complication rates (prematch, 2.4% vs. 2.4%; and postmatch, 2.4% vs. 1.7%), readmission (prematch, 4.1% vs. 3.2%; and postmatch, 3.9% vs. 3.3%), and reoperation (prematch 0.9% vs. 1.8%; and postmatch 0.9% vs. 1.5%). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate similar 30-day outcomes in both cohorts and suggest that instrumentation can be safely implemented in the setting of ACDF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6935950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69359502019-12-31 Comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: A review of 2352 elective cases Lim, Seokchun Haider, Sameah Zakaria, Hesham Chang, Victor Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly performed procedure to address cervical myeloradiculopathy. However, 30-day outcomes after additional plating/instrumentation are not very clear. METHODS: The authors reviewed The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify all elective ACDF cases with or without instrumentation for patients having cervical spondylosis with or without myelopathy from 2011 to 2013 using current procedural terminology and International Classification of Disease-9 codes. We identified 2352 cases and subdivided these into two cohorts based on instrumentation procedures (588 cases without instrumentation and 1764 cases with instrumentation). Baseline differences in two cohorts were adjusted by propensity score matching analysis, yielding well-matched 583 pairs. RESULTS: Following propensity matching, the authors observed no significant difference in 30-day complication rates (prematch, 2.4% vs. 2.4%; and postmatch, 2.4% vs. 1.7%), readmission (prematch, 4.1% vs. 3.2%; and postmatch, 3.9% vs. 3.3%), and reoperation (prematch 0.9% vs. 1.8%; and postmatch 0.9% vs. 1.5%). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate similar 30-day outcomes in both cohorts and suggest that instrumentation can be safely implemented in the setting of ACDF. Scientific Scholar 2019-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6935950/ /pubmed/31893147 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_513_2019 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Seokchun
Haider, Sameah
Zakaria, Hesham
Chang, Victor
Comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: A review of 2352 elective cases
title Comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: A review of 2352 elective cases
title_full Comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: A review of 2352 elective cases
title_fullStr Comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: A review of 2352 elective cases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: A review of 2352 elective cases
title_short Comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: A review of 2352 elective cases
title_sort comparison of 30-day outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without instrumentation for cervical spondylosis: a review of 2352 elective cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6935950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893147
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_513_2019
work_keys_str_mv AT limseokchun comparisonof30dayoutcomefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithorwithoutinstrumentationforcervicalspondylosisareviewof2352electivecases
AT haidersameah comparisonof30dayoutcomefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithorwithoutinstrumentationforcervicalspondylosisareviewof2352electivecases
AT zakariahesham comparisonof30dayoutcomefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithorwithoutinstrumentationforcervicalspondylosisareviewof2352electivecases
AT changvictor comparisonof30dayoutcomefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithorwithoutinstrumentationforcervicalspondylosisareviewof2352electivecases