Cargando…

Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure

PURPOSE: Literature describes the concern of an overstuffed shoulder joint after a resurfacing humeral head implant (RHHI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-observer variability of (1) the critical shoulder angle (CSA), (2) the length of the gleno-humeral offset (LGHO), and (3) the an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geervliet, Pieter C., Willems, Jore H., Sierevelt, Inger N., Visser, Cornelis P. J., van Noort, Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1522-1
_version_ 1783483687677984768
author Geervliet, Pieter C.
Willems, Jore H.
Sierevelt, Inger N.
Visser, Cornelis P. J.
van Noort, Arthur
author_facet Geervliet, Pieter C.
Willems, Jore H.
Sierevelt, Inger N.
Visser, Cornelis P. J.
van Noort, Arthur
author_sort Geervliet, Pieter C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Literature describes the concern of an overstuffed shoulder joint after a resurfacing humeral head implant (RHHI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-observer variability of (1) the critical shoulder angle (CSA), (2) the length of the gleno-humeral offset (LGHO), and (3) the anatomic center of rotation (COR) in a patient population operated with a Global Conservative Anatomic Prosthesis (CAP) RHHI. The measurements were compared between the revision and non-revision groups to find predictive indicators for failure. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative radiographs were retrieved from 48 patients who underwent RHHI from 2007 to 2009 using a Global CAP hemiarthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis. This cohort consisted of 36 females (12 men) with a mean age of 77 years (SD 7.5). Two musculoskeletal radiologist and two specialized shoulder orthopedic surgeons measured the CSA, LGHO, and COR of all patients. RESULTS: The inter-observer reliability showed excellent reliability for the CSA, LGHO, and the COR, varying between 0.91 and 0.98. The mean COR of the non-revision group was 4.9 mm (SD 2.5) compared to mean COR of the revision group, 8 mm (SD 2.2) (p < 0.01). The COR is the predictor of failure (OR 1.90 (95%Cl 1.19–3.02)) with a cut of point of 5.8 mm. The mean CSA was 29.8° (SD 3.9) There was no significant difference between the revision and non-revision groups (p = 0.34). The mean LGHO was 2.6 mm (SD 3.3) post-surgery. The mean LGHO of the revision group was 3.9 (SD 1.7) (p = 0.04) post-surgery. Despite the difference in mean LGHO, this is not a predictor for failure. CONCLUSION: The CSA, LGHO, and COR can be used on radiographs and have a high inter-observer agreement. In contrast with the CSA and LGHO, we found a correlation between clinical failure and revision surgery in case of a deviation of the COR greater than 5 mm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institutional review board, number: ACLU 2016.0054, Ethical Committee number: CBP M1330348. Registered 7 November 2006.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6936124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69361242019-12-31 Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure Geervliet, Pieter C. Willems, Jore H. Sierevelt, Inger N. Visser, Cornelis P. J. van Noort, Arthur J Orthop Surg Res Research Article PURPOSE: Literature describes the concern of an overstuffed shoulder joint after a resurfacing humeral head implant (RHHI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-observer variability of (1) the critical shoulder angle (CSA), (2) the length of the gleno-humeral offset (LGHO), and (3) the anatomic center of rotation (COR) in a patient population operated with a Global Conservative Anatomic Prosthesis (CAP) RHHI. The measurements were compared between the revision and non-revision groups to find predictive indicators for failure. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative radiographs were retrieved from 48 patients who underwent RHHI from 2007 to 2009 using a Global CAP hemiarthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis. This cohort consisted of 36 females (12 men) with a mean age of 77 years (SD 7.5). Two musculoskeletal radiologist and two specialized shoulder orthopedic surgeons measured the CSA, LGHO, and COR of all patients. RESULTS: The inter-observer reliability showed excellent reliability for the CSA, LGHO, and the COR, varying between 0.91 and 0.98. The mean COR of the non-revision group was 4.9 mm (SD 2.5) compared to mean COR of the revision group, 8 mm (SD 2.2) (p < 0.01). The COR is the predictor of failure (OR 1.90 (95%Cl 1.19–3.02)) with a cut of point of 5.8 mm. The mean CSA was 29.8° (SD 3.9) There was no significant difference between the revision and non-revision groups (p = 0.34). The mean LGHO was 2.6 mm (SD 3.3) post-surgery. The mean LGHO of the revision group was 3.9 (SD 1.7) (p = 0.04) post-surgery. Despite the difference in mean LGHO, this is not a predictor for failure. CONCLUSION: The CSA, LGHO, and COR can be used on radiographs and have a high inter-observer agreement. In contrast with the CSA and LGHO, we found a correlation between clinical failure and revision surgery in case of a deviation of the COR greater than 5 mm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institutional review board, number: ACLU 2016.0054, Ethical Committee number: CBP M1330348. Registered 7 November 2006. BioMed Central 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6936124/ /pubmed/31888675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1522-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Geervliet, Pieter C.
Willems, Jore H.
Sierevelt, Inger N.
Visser, Cornelis P. J.
van Noort, Arthur
Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure
title Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure
title_full Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure
title_fullStr Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure
title_full_unstemmed Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure
title_short Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure
title_sort overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1522-1
work_keys_str_mv AT geervlietpieterc overstuffinginresurfacinghemiarthroplastyisapotentialriskforfailure
AT willemsjoreh overstuffinginresurfacinghemiarthroplastyisapotentialriskforfailure
AT siereveltingern overstuffinginresurfacinghemiarthroplastyisapotentialriskforfailure
AT vissercornelispj overstuffinginresurfacinghemiarthroplastyisapotentialriskforfailure
AT vannoortarthur overstuffinginresurfacinghemiarthroplastyisapotentialriskforfailure