Cargando…
Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: There is a need to provide a large amount of extra practice on top of usual rehabilitation to adults after stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine if it is feasible to add extra upper limb practice to usual inpatient rehabilitation and whether it is likely to improve upper lim...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0531-5 |
_version_ | 1783483693383286784 |
---|---|
author | Schneider, Emma J. Ada, Louise Lannin, Natasha A. |
author_facet | Schneider, Emma J. Ada, Louise Lannin, Natasha A. |
author_sort | Schneider, Emma J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a need to provide a large amount of extra practice on top of usual rehabilitation to adults after stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine if it is feasible to add extra upper limb practice to usual inpatient rehabilitation and whether it is likely to improve upper limb activity and grip strength. METHOD: A prospective, single-group, pre- and post-test study was carried out. Twenty adults with upper limb activity limitations who had some movement in the upper limb completed an extra hour of upper limb practice, 6 days per week for 4 weeks. Feasibility was measured by examining recruitment, intervention (adherence, efficiency, acceptability, safety) and measurement. Clinical outcomes were upper limb activity (Box and Block Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test) and grip strength (dynamometry) measured at baseline (week 0) and end of intervention (week 4). RESULTS: Of the 212 people who were screened, 42 (20%) were eligible and 20 (9%) were enrolled. Of the 20 participants, 12 (60%) completed the 4-week program; 7 (35%) were discharged early, and 1 (5%) withdrew. Participants attended 342 (85%) of the possible 403 sessions and practiced for 324 (95%) of the total 342 h. In terms of safety, there were no study-related adverse events. Participants increased 0.29 blocks/s (95% CI 0.19 to 0.39) on the Box and Block Test, 0.20 pegs/s (95% CI 0.10 to 0.30) on the Nine-Hole Peg Test, and 4.4 kg (95% CI 2.9 to 5.9) in grip strength, from baseline to end of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: It appears feasible for adults who are undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and have some upper limb movement after stroke to undertake an hour of extra upper limb practice. The magnitude of the clinical outcomes suggests that further investigation is warranted and this study provides useful information for the design of a phase II randomized trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12615000665538). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6936148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69361482019-12-31 Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study Schneider, Emma J. Ada, Louise Lannin, Natasha A. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: There is a need to provide a large amount of extra practice on top of usual rehabilitation to adults after stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine if it is feasible to add extra upper limb practice to usual inpatient rehabilitation and whether it is likely to improve upper limb activity and grip strength. METHOD: A prospective, single-group, pre- and post-test study was carried out. Twenty adults with upper limb activity limitations who had some movement in the upper limb completed an extra hour of upper limb practice, 6 days per week for 4 weeks. Feasibility was measured by examining recruitment, intervention (adherence, efficiency, acceptability, safety) and measurement. Clinical outcomes were upper limb activity (Box and Block Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test) and grip strength (dynamometry) measured at baseline (week 0) and end of intervention (week 4). RESULTS: Of the 212 people who were screened, 42 (20%) were eligible and 20 (9%) were enrolled. Of the 20 participants, 12 (60%) completed the 4-week program; 7 (35%) were discharged early, and 1 (5%) withdrew. Participants attended 342 (85%) of the possible 403 sessions and practiced for 324 (95%) of the total 342 h. In terms of safety, there were no study-related adverse events. Participants increased 0.29 blocks/s (95% CI 0.19 to 0.39) on the Box and Block Test, 0.20 pegs/s (95% CI 0.10 to 0.30) on the Nine-Hole Peg Test, and 4.4 kg (95% CI 2.9 to 5.9) in grip strength, from baseline to end of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: It appears feasible for adults who are undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and have some upper limb movement after stroke to undertake an hour of extra upper limb practice. The magnitude of the clinical outcomes suggests that further investigation is warranted and this study provides useful information for the design of a phase II randomized trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12615000665538). BioMed Central 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6936148/ /pubmed/31893129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0531-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Schneider, Emma J. Ada, Louise Lannin, Natasha A. Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study |
title | Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_full | Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_short | Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_sort | extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0531-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneideremmaj extraupperlimbpracticeafterstrokeafeasibilitystudy AT adalouise extraupperlimbpracticeafterstrokeafeasibilitystudy AT lanninnatashaa extraupperlimbpracticeafterstrokeafeasibilitystudy |