Cargando…

Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Identifying design features and implementation strategies to optimise community health worker (CHW) programmes is important in the context of mixed results at scale. We systematically reviewed evidence of the effects of proactive case detection by CHWs in low-income and middle-income c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whidden, Caroline, Thwing, Julie, Gutman, Julie, Wohl, Ethan, Leyrat, Clémence, Kayentao, Kassoum, Johnson, Ari David, Greenwood, Brian, Chandramohan, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001799
_version_ 1783483733510193152
author Whidden, Caroline
Thwing, Julie
Gutman, Julie
Wohl, Ethan
Leyrat, Clémence
Kayentao, Kassoum
Johnson, Ari David
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
author_facet Whidden, Caroline
Thwing, Julie
Gutman, Julie
Wohl, Ethan
Leyrat, Clémence
Kayentao, Kassoum
Johnson, Ari David
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
author_sort Whidden, Caroline
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Identifying design features and implementation strategies to optimise community health worker (CHW) programmes is important in the context of mixed results at scale. We systematically reviewed evidence of the effects of proactive case detection by CHWs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) on mortality, morbidity and access to care for common childhood illnesses. METHODS: Published studies were identified via electronic databases from 1978 to 2017. We included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before–after studies and interrupted time series studies, and assessed their quality for risk of bias. We reported measures of effect as study investigators reported them, and synthesised by outcomes of mortality, disease prevalence, hospitalisation and access to treatment. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) as a principal summary measure, with CIs adjusted for cluster design effect. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies of 11 interventions from nine LMICs that met inclusion criteria. They showed considerable diversity in intervention design and implementation, comparison, outcomes and study quality, which precluded meta-analysis. Proactive case detection may reduce infant mortality (RR: 0.52–0.94) and increase access to effective treatment (RR: 1.59–4.64) compared with conventional community-based healthcare delivery (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether proactive case detection reduces mortality among children under 5 years (RR: 0.04–0.80), prevalence of infectious diseases (RR: 0.06–1.02), hospitalisation (RR: 0.38–1.26) or increases access to prompt treatment (RR: 1.00–2.39) because the certainty of this evidence is very low. CONCLUSION: Proactive case detection may provide promising benefits for child health, but evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions. More research is needed on proactive case detection with rigorous study designs that use standardised outcomes and measurement methods, and report more detail on complex intervention design and implementation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017074621.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6936477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69364772020-01-06 Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review Whidden, Caroline Thwing, Julie Gutman, Julie Wohl, Ethan Leyrat, Clémence Kayentao, Kassoum Johnson, Ari David Greenwood, Brian Chandramohan, Daniel BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: Identifying design features and implementation strategies to optimise community health worker (CHW) programmes is important in the context of mixed results at scale. We systematically reviewed evidence of the effects of proactive case detection by CHWs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) on mortality, morbidity and access to care for common childhood illnesses. METHODS: Published studies were identified via electronic databases from 1978 to 2017. We included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before–after studies and interrupted time series studies, and assessed their quality for risk of bias. We reported measures of effect as study investigators reported them, and synthesised by outcomes of mortality, disease prevalence, hospitalisation and access to treatment. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) as a principal summary measure, with CIs adjusted for cluster design effect. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies of 11 interventions from nine LMICs that met inclusion criteria. They showed considerable diversity in intervention design and implementation, comparison, outcomes and study quality, which precluded meta-analysis. Proactive case detection may reduce infant mortality (RR: 0.52–0.94) and increase access to effective treatment (RR: 1.59–4.64) compared with conventional community-based healthcare delivery (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether proactive case detection reduces mortality among children under 5 years (RR: 0.04–0.80), prevalence of infectious diseases (RR: 0.06–1.02), hospitalisation (RR: 0.38–1.26) or increases access to prompt treatment (RR: 1.00–2.39) because the certainty of this evidence is very low. CONCLUSION: Proactive case detection may provide promising benefits for child health, but evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions. More research is needed on proactive case detection with rigorous study designs that use standardised outcomes and measurement methods, and report more detail on complex intervention design and implementation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017074621. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6936477/ /pubmed/31908858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001799 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Whidden, Caroline
Thwing, Julie
Gutman, Julie
Wohl, Ethan
Leyrat, Clémence
Kayentao, Kassoum
Johnson, Ari David
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review
title Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review
title_full Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review
title_fullStr Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review
title_short Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review
title_sort proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001799
work_keys_str_mv AT whiddencaroline proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview
AT thwingjulie proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview
AT gutmanjulie proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview
AT wohlethan proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview
AT leyratclemence proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview
AT kayentaokassoum proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview
AT johnsonaridavid proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview
AT greenwoodbrian proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview
AT chandramohandaniel proactivecasedetectionofcommonchildhoodillnessesbycommunityhealthworkersasystematicreview