Cargando…
Effects of PACK guide training on the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by primary care clinicians: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in Florianópolis, Brazil
INTRODUCTION: The Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) guide was localised for Brazil, where primary care doctors and nurses were trained to use it. METHODS: Twenty-four municipal clinics in Florianópolis were randomly allocated to receive outreach training and the guide, and 24 were allocated to r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001921 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: The Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) guide was localised for Brazil, where primary care doctors and nurses were trained to use it. METHODS: Twenty-four municipal clinics in Florianópolis were randomly allocated to receive outreach training and the guide, and 24 were allocated to receive only the guide. 6666 adult patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were enrolled, and trial outcomes were measured over 12 months, using electronic medical records. The primary outcomes were composite scores of treatment changes and spirometry, and new asthma and COPD diagnosis rates. RESULTS: Asthma scores in 2437 intervention group participants were higher (74.8%, 20.4% and 4.8% with scores of 0, 1 and 2, respectively) than in 2633 control group participants (80.0%, 16.8% and 3.2%) (OR for higher score 1.32, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.61, p=0.006). Adjusted for asthma scores recorded in each clinic before training started, the OR was 1.24 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.50, p=0.022). COPD scores in 1371 intervention group participants (77.7%, 17.9% and 4.3% with scores of 0, 1 and 2) did not differ from those in 1181 control group participants (80.5%, 15.8% and 3.7%) (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.55, p=0.142). Rates of new asthma and COPD diagnoses, and hospital admission, and indicators of investigation, diagnosis and treatment of comorbid cardiovascular disease, diabetes and depression, and tobacco cessation did not differ between trial arms. CONCLUSION: PACK training increased guideline-based treatment and spirometry for asthma but did not affect COPD or comorbid conditions, or diagnosis rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02786030 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/). PORTUGUESE (BRAZIL) INTRODUÇÃO: O guia de Abordagem Prática do Kit de Cuidados em Saúde (PACK) foi adaptado para o sistema de saúde do Brasil; médicos e enfermeiros da atenção primária foram treinados para usá-lo na pratica clínica. MÉTODOS: Vinte e quatro unidades básicas de saúde (UBS) municipais de Florianópolis foram alocadas aleatoriamente para receber treinamento nas UBS utilizando o guia, e 24 foram alocadas para receber apenas o guia. Foram analisados dados de 6.666 pacientes adultos com asma ou doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC) e os desfechos foram medidos por doze meses, através de registros médicos eletrônicos. Os resultados principais foram escores compostos de mudança no tratamento, realização de espirometria e taxas de novos diagnósticos de asma e DPOC. RESULTADOS: os escores de asma em 2437 participantes do grupo de intervenção foram maiores (74,8%, 20,4% e 4,8% com escores de 0, 1 e 2 respectivamente) do que em 2633 participantes do grupo controle (80,0%, 16,8% e 3,2%) (odds ratio (OR) para pontuação mais alta 1,32, intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC) 1,08-1,61, p = 0,006). Ajustado para os escores de asma registrados em cada clínica antes do início do treinamento, o OR foi de 1,24 (IC 95% 1,03-1,50, p = 0,022). Os escores da DPOC em 1371 participantes do grupo de intervenção (77,7%, 17,9% e 4,3% com escores de 0, 1 e 2) não diferiram dos de 1181 participantes do grupo controle (80,5%, 15,8% e 3,7%) (OR 1,21 (IC95% 0,94-1,55, p = 0,142) As taxas de novos diagnósticos de asma e DPOC, internação hospitalar e indicadores de diagnóstico e tratamento de co-morbidades cardiovasculares, diabete, depressão e cessação do tabagismo não diferiram entre os grupos experimentais. CONCLUSÃO: O treinamento com PACK aumentou o tratamento baseado em diretrizes e espirometria para asma, mas não afetou as co-morbidades em DPOC ou as taxas de diagnóstico. |
---|