Cargando…
Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study
OBJECTIVE: The general purpose for ethics consultations is to deliberate on issues on medical and scientific research and act towards the safeguard of the patient's rights and dignity. With the implementation of European Union (EU) Regulation 536/2014 on clinical trials and cost and time-optimi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31887158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226710 |
_version_ | 1783483770232373248 |
---|---|
author | De Panfilis, Ludovica Merlo, Domenico Franco Satolli, Roberto Perin, Marta Ghirotto, Luca Costantini, Massimo |
author_facet | De Panfilis, Ludovica Merlo, Domenico Franco Satolli, Roberto Perin, Marta Ghirotto, Luca Costantini, Massimo |
author_sort | De Panfilis, Ludovica |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The general purpose for ethics consultations is to deliberate on issues on medical and scientific research and act towards the safeguard of the patient's rights and dignity. With the implementation of European Union (EU) Regulation 536/2014 on clinical trials and cost and time-optimization, the nature of consultations and the bodies they are carried out might be to some extent affected. Accordingly, we sought to gain an updated perspective on the current role and current practices of ethics consultations nationwide in both clinical and research settings. METHODS: The study was carried forth by a three-step mixed-method approach: i) review of policies/regulations for ethics committee (EC) nationwide; ii) a structured survey on ethics consultation activity completed by each EC during 2016; iii) incorporated into the third part, a qualitative assessment with a selected sample of 8 key-informants for a semi-structured interview, discussing EC history, the ethics consultation function, and the professional experience of consultants. RESULTS: Review of the policies/regulations promoted by ECs showed that 72,6% (n = 69) of all the ECs (N = 95) being actually capable of providing ethics consultation service by policy. 71 ECs (74.7%) responded to the survey on ethics consultation requests; among them, 48 (67.6%) provided ethics consultations of which 23 (23/48) actually received requests for this service in the year 2016. Many ECs did not have a structured database in place to provide precise figures of requests received in the last year nor of their contents. CONCLUSION: To date, ethics consultation in clinical and research practice is largely underappreciated and not well understood by users. The consultants themselves lack a comprehensive vision of work carried out in their field, and bioethics training programs to keep them updated. Despite clinical ethics consultation services should not necessarily be mandatory, following the recent EU Regulation on clinical trials, institutional ethics consultation bodies should be re-evaluated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6936824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69368242020-01-07 Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study De Panfilis, Ludovica Merlo, Domenico Franco Satolli, Roberto Perin, Marta Ghirotto, Luca Costantini, Massimo PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The general purpose for ethics consultations is to deliberate on issues on medical and scientific research and act towards the safeguard of the patient's rights and dignity. With the implementation of European Union (EU) Regulation 536/2014 on clinical trials and cost and time-optimization, the nature of consultations and the bodies they are carried out might be to some extent affected. Accordingly, we sought to gain an updated perspective on the current role and current practices of ethics consultations nationwide in both clinical and research settings. METHODS: The study was carried forth by a three-step mixed-method approach: i) review of policies/regulations for ethics committee (EC) nationwide; ii) a structured survey on ethics consultation activity completed by each EC during 2016; iii) incorporated into the third part, a qualitative assessment with a selected sample of 8 key-informants for a semi-structured interview, discussing EC history, the ethics consultation function, and the professional experience of consultants. RESULTS: Review of the policies/regulations promoted by ECs showed that 72,6% (n = 69) of all the ECs (N = 95) being actually capable of providing ethics consultation service by policy. 71 ECs (74.7%) responded to the survey on ethics consultation requests; among them, 48 (67.6%) provided ethics consultations of which 23 (23/48) actually received requests for this service in the year 2016. Many ECs did not have a structured database in place to provide precise figures of requests received in the last year nor of their contents. CONCLUSION: To date, ethics consultation in clinical and research practice is largely underappreciated and not well understood by users. The consultants themselves lack a comprehensive vision of work carried out in their field, and bioethics training programs to keep them updated. Despite clinical ethics consultation services should not necessarily be mandatory, following the recent EU Regulation on clinical trials, institutional ethics consultation bodies should be re-evaluated. Public Library of Science 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6936824/ /pubmed/31887158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226710 Text en © 2019 De Panfilis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article De Panfilis, Ludovica Merlo, Domenico Franco Satolli, Roberto Perin, Marta Ghirotto, Luca Costantini, Massimo Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study |
title | Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study |
title_full | Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study |
title_fullStr | Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study |
title_short | Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study |
title_sort | clinical ethics consultation among italian ethics committee: a mixed method study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31887158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226710 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depanfilisludovica clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy AT merlodomenicofranco clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy AT satolliroberto clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy AT perinmarta clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy AT ghirottoluca clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy AT costantinimassimo clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy |