Cargando…

Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study

OBJECTIVE: The general purpose for ethics consultations is to deliberate on issues on medical and scientific research and act towards the safeguard of the patient's rights and dignity. With the implementation of European Union (EU) Regulation 536/2014 on clinical trials and cost and time-optimi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Panfilis, Ludovica, Merlo, Domenico Franco, Satolli, Roberto, Perin, Marta, Ghirotto, Luca, Costantini, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31887158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226710
_version_ 1783483770232373248
author De Panfilis, Ludovica
Merlo, Domenico Franco
Satolli, Roberto
Perin, Marta
Ghirotto, Luca
Costantini, Massimo
author_facet De Panfilis, Ludovica
Merlo, Domenico Franco
Satolli, Roberto
Perin, Marta
Ghirotto, Luca
Costantini, Massimo
author_sort De Panfilis, Ludovica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The general purpose for ethics consultations is to deliberate on issues on medical and scientific research and act towards the safeguard of the patient's rights and dignity. With the implementation of European Union (EU) Regulation 536/2014 on clinical trials and cost and time-optimization, the nature of consultations and the bodies they are carried out might be to some extent affected. Accordingly, we sought to gain an updated perspective on the current role and current practices of ethics consultations nationwide in both clinical and research settings. METHODS: The study was carried forth by a three-step mixed-method approach: i) review of policies/regulations for ethics committee (EC) nationwide; ii) a structured survey on ethics consultation activity completed by each EC during 2016; iii) incorporated into the third part, a qualitative assessment with a selected sample of 8 key-informants for a semi-structured interview, discussing EC history, the ethics consultation function, and the professional experience of consultants. RESULTS: Review of the policies/regulations promoted by ECs showed that 72,6% (n = 69) of all the ECs (N = 95) being actually capable of providing ethics consultation service by policy. 71 ECs (74.7%) responded to the survey on ethics consultation requests; among them, 48 (67.6%) provided ethics consultations of which 23 (23/48) actually received requests for this service in the year 2016. Many ECs did not have a structured database in place to provide precise figures of requests received in the last year nor of their contents. CONCLUSION: To date, ethics consultation in clinical and research practice is largely underappreciated and not well understood by users. The consultants themselves lack a comprehensive vision of work carried out in their field, and bioethics training programs to keep them updated. Despite clinical ethics consultation services should not necessarily be mandatory, following the recent EU Regulation on clinical trials, institutional ethics consultation bodies should be re-evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6936824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69368242020-01-07 Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study De Panfilis, Ludovica Merlo, Domenico Franco Satolli, Roberto Perin, Marta Ghirotto, Luca Costantini, Massimo PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The general purpose for ethics consultations is to deliberate on issues on medical and scientific research and act towards the safeguard of the patient's rights and dignity. With the implementation of European Union (EU) Regulation 536/2014 on clinical trials and cost and time-optimization, the nature of consultations and the bodies they are carried out might be to some extent affected. Accordingly, we sought to gain an updated perspective on the current role and current practices of ethics consultations nationwide in both clinical and research settings. METHODS: The study was carried forth by a three-step mixed-method approach: i) review of policies/regulations for ethics committee (EC) nationwide; ii) a structured survey on ethics consultation activity completed by each EC during 2016; iii) incorporated into the third part, a qualitative assessment with a selected sample of 8 key-informants for a semi-structured interview, discussing EC history, the ethics consultation function, and the professional experience of consultants. RESULTS: Review of the policies/regulations promoted by ECs showed that 72,6% (n = 69) of all the ECs (N = 95) being actually capable of providing ethics consultation service by policy. 71 ECs (74.7%) responded to the survey on ethics consultation requests; among them, 48 (67.6%) provided ethics consultations of which 23 (23/48) actually received requests for this service in the year 2016. Many ECs did not have a structured database in place to provide precise figures of requests received in the last year nor of their contents. CONCLUSION: To date, ethics consultation in clinical and research practice is largely underappreciated and not well understood by users. The consultants themselves lack a comprehensive vision of work carried out in their field, and bioethics training programs to keep them updated. Despite clinical ethics consultation services should not necessarily be mandatory, following the recent EU Regulation on clinical trials, institutional ethics consultation bodies should be re-evaluated. Public Library of Science 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6936824/ /pubmed/31887158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226710 Text en © 2019 De Panfilis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Panfilis, Ludovica
Merlo, Domenico Franco
Satolli, Roberto
Perin, Marta
Ghirotto, Luca
Costantini, Massimo
Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study
title Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study
title_full Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study
title_fullStr Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study
title_short Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: A mixed method study
title_sort clinical ethics consultation among italian ethics committee: a mixed method study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31887158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226710
work_keys_str_mv AT depanfilisludovica clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy
AT merlodomenicofranco clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy
AT satolliroberto clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy
AT perinmarta clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy
AT ghirottoluca clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy
AT costantinimassimo clinicalethicsconsultationamongitalianethicscommitteeamixedmethodstudy