Cargando…
Probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways
Dynamic communication and routing play important roles in the human brain in order to facilitate flexibility in task solving and thought processes. Here, we present a network perturbation methodology that allows investigating dynamic switching between different network pathways based on phase offset...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31841504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007551 |
_version_ | 1783483778294874112 |
---|---|
author | Finger, Holger Gast, Richard Gerloff, Christian Engel, Andreas K. König, Peter |
author_facet | Finger, Holger Gast, Richard Gerloff, Christian Engel, Andreas K. König, Peter |
author_sort | Finger, Holger |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dynamic communication and routing play important roles in the human brain in order to facilitate flexibility in task solving and thought processes. Here, we present a network perturbation methodology that allows investigating dynamic switching between different network pathways based on phase offsets between two external oscillatory drivers. We apply this method in a computational model of the human connectome with delay-coupled neural masses. To analyze dynamic switching of pathways, we define four new metrics that measure dynamic network response properties for pairs of stimulated nodes. Evaluating these metrics for all network pathways, we found a broad spectrum of pathways with distinct dynamic properties and switching behaviors. We show that network pathways can have characteristic timescales and thus specific preferences for the phase lag between the regions they connect. Specifically, we identified pairs of network nodes whose connecting paths can either be (1) insensitive to the phase relationship between the node pair, (2) turned on and off via changes in the phase relationship between the node pair, or (3) switched between via changes in the phase relationship between the node pair. Regarding the latter, we found that 33% of node pairs can switch their communication from one pathway to another depending on their phase offsets. This reveals a potential mechanistic role that phase offsets and coupling delays might play for the dynamic information routing via communication pathways in the brain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6936858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69368582020-01-07 Probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways Finger, Holger Gast, Richard Gerloff, Christian Engel, Andreas K. König, Peter PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Dynamic communication and routing play important roles in the human brain in order to facilitate flexibility in task solving and thought processes. Here, we present a network perturbation methodology that allows investigating dynamic switching between different network pathways based on phase offsets between two external oscillatory drivers. We apply this method in a computational model of the human connectome with delay-coupled neural masses. To analyze dynamic switching of pathways, we define four new metrics that measure dynamic network response properties for pairs of stimulated nodes. Evaluating these metrics for all network pathways, we found a broad spectrum of pathways with distinct dynamic properties and switching behaviors. We show that network pathways can have characteristic timescales and thus specific preferences for the phase lag between the regions they connect. Specifically, we identified pairs of network nodes whose connecting paths can either be (1) insensitive to the phase relationship between the node pair, (2) turned on and off via changes in the phase relationship between the node pair, or (3) switched between via changes in the phase relationship between the node pair. Regarding the latter, we found that 33% of node pairs can switch their communication from one pathway to another depending on their phase offsets. This reveals a potential mechanistic role that phase offsets and coupling delays might play for the dynamic information routing via communication pathways in the brain. Public Library of Science 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6936858/ /pubmed/31841504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007551 Text en © 2019 Finger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Finger, Holger Gast, Richard Gerloff, Christian Engel, Andreas K. König, Peter Probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways |
title | Probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways |
title_full | Probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways |
title_fullStr | Probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways |
title_full_unstemmed | Probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways |
title_short | Probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways |
title_sort | probing neural networks for dynamic switches of communication pathways |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31841504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fingerholger probingneuralnetworksfordynamicswitchesofcommunicationpathways AT gastrichard probingneuralnetworksfordynamicswitchesofcommunicationpathways AT gerloffchristian probingneuralnetworksfordynamicswitchesofcommunicationpathways AT engelandreask probingneuralnetworksfordynamicswitchesofcommunicationpathways AT konigpeter probingneuralnetworksfordynamicswitchesofcommunicationpathways |