Cargando…
Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: To accumulate evidence that obstacle avoidance training alone is effective in improving the locomotor ability of individuals with stroke. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ICTRP and PEDro were searched for related information until December 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31848159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028873 |
_version_ | 1783483810443165696 |
---|---|
author | Muroi, Daisuke Ohtera, Shosuke Kataoka, Yuki Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Hiraku Higuchi, Takahiro |
author_facet | Muroi, Daisuke Ohtera, Shosuke Kataoka, Yuki Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Hiraku Higuchi, Takahiro |
author_sort | Muroi, Daisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To accumulate evidence that obstacle avoidance training alone is effective in improving the locomotor ability of individuals with stroke. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ICTRP and PEDro were searched for related information until December 2018. Two independent reviewers extracted data. Outcome measurement data were subjected to meta-analyses using random-effects models. Data syntheses were conducted using RevMan V.5.3, and the certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with various types and phases of stroke were included. INTERVENTION: The usual gait training including obstacle avoidance training (interventions of any type, intensity, duration and frequency). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were gait speed, composite gait ability and objective balance ability. Secondary outcomes were subjective balance ability, gait endurance and fall incidence. RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials with a total of 49 participants were used as data sources for this study. The obstacle avoidance training (training) group had lower gait speed than the control group (mean difference (MD) 0.03, 95% CI −0.11 to 0.16, p=0.51). Further, the certainty of evidence was very low. The subjective balance ability (Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale) was not significantly different between the training and control groups (MD 6.65, 95% CI −7.59 to 20.89, p=0.36), and it showed very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Obstacle avoidance training may have little or no effect on individuals with stroke. The failure to find the effectiveness of obstacle avoidance training alone is possibly attributable to the insufficient amount of training in the intervention and the lack of well-designed studies that measured relevant outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017060691. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6937042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69370422020-01-06 Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis Muroi, Daisuke Ohtera, Shosuke Kataoka, Yuki Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Hiraku Higuchi, Takahiro BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: To accumulate evidence that obstacle avoidance training alone is effective in improving the locomotor ability of individuals with stroke. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ICTRP and PEDro were searched for related information until December 2018. Two independent reviewers extracted data. Outcome measurement data were subjected to meta-analyses using random-effects models. Data syntheses were conducted using RevMan V.5.3, and the certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with various types and phases of stroke were included. INTERVENTION: The usual gait training including obstacle avoidance training (interventions of any type, intensity, duration and frequency). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were gait speed, composite gait ability and objective balance ability. Secondary outcomes were subjective balance ability, gait endurance and fall incidence. RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials with a total of 49 participants were used as data sources for this study. The obstacle avoidance training (training) group had lower gait speed than the control group (mean difference (MD) 0.03, 95% CI −0.11 to 0.16, p=0.51). Further, the certainty of evidence was very low. The subjective balance ability (Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale) was not significantly different between the training and control groups (MD 6.65, 95% CI −7.59 to 20.89, p=0.36), and it showed very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Obstacle avoidance training may have little or no effect on individuals with stroke. The failure to find the effectiveness of obstacle avoidance training alone is possibly attributable to the insufficient amount of training in the intervention and the lack of well-designed studies that measured relevant outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017060691. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6937042/ /pubmed/31848159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028873 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Muroi, Daisuke Ohtera, Shosuke Kataoka, Yuki Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Hiraku Higuchi, Takahiro Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31848159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028873 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muroidaisuke obstacleavoidancetrainingforindividualswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ohterashosuke obstacleavoidancetrainingforindividualswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kataokayuki obstacleavoidancetrainingforindividualswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bannomasahiro obstacleavoidancetrainingforindividualswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tsujimotoyasushi obstacleavoidancetrainingforindividualswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tsujimotohiraku obstacleavoidancetrainingforindividualswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT higuchitakahiro obstacleavoidancetrainingforindividualswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |