Cargando…
Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Scientific progress and translation of evidence into practice is impeded by poorly described interventions. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was developed to specify the minimal intervention elements that should be reported. OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31862736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025511 |
_version_ | 1783483814469697536 |
---|---|
author | de Barra, Mícheál Scott, Claire Johnston, Marie De Bruin, M Scott, Neil Matheson, Catriona Bond, Christine Watson, Margaret |
author_facet | de Barra, Mícheál Scott, Claire Johnston, Marie De Bruin, M Scott, Neil Matheson, Catriona Bond, Christine Watson, Margaret |
author_sort | de Barra, Mícheál |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Scientific progress and translation of evidence into practice is impeded by poorly described interventions. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was developed to specify the minimal intervention elements that should be reported. OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the extent to which outpatient pharmacy interventions were adequately reported. (2) To examine the dimension(s) across which reporting quality varies. (3) To examine trial characteristics that predict better reporting. METHODS: The sample comprised 86 randomised controlled trials identified in a Cochrane review of the effectiveness of pharmacist interventions on patient health outcomes. Duplicate, independent application of a modified 15-item TIDieR checklist was undertaken to assess the intervention reporting. The reporting/non-reporting of TIDieR items was analysed with principal component analysis to evaluate the dimensionality of reporting quality and regression analyses to assess predictors of reporting quality RESULTS: In total, 422 (40%) TIDieR items were fully reported, 395 (38%) were partially reported and 231 (22%) were not reported. A further 242 items were deemed not applicable to the specific trials. Reporting quality loaded on one component which accounted for 26% of the variance in TIDieR scores. More recent trials reported a slightly greater number of TIDieR items (0.07 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.13) additional TIDieR items per year of publication). Trials reported an 0.09 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.14) additional TIDieR items per unit increase in impact factor (IF) of the journal in which the main report was published. CONCLUSIONS: Most trials lacked adequate intervention reporting. This diminished the applied and scientific value of their research. The standard of intervention reporting is, however, gradually increasing and appears somewhat better in journals with higher IFs. The use of the TIDieR checklist to improve reporting could enhance the utility and replicability of trials, and reduce research waste. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6937059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69370592020-01-06 Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review de Barra, Mícheál Scott, Claire Johnston, Marie De Bruin, M Scott, Neil Matheson, Catriona Bond, Christine Watson, Margaret BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: Scientific progress and translation of evidence into practice is impeded by poorly described interventions. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was developed to specify the minimal intervention elements that should be reported. OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the extent to which outpatient pharmacy interventions were adequately reported. (2) To examine the dimension(s) across which reporting quality varies. (3) To examine trial characteristics that predict better reporting. METHODS: The sample comprised 86 randomised controlled trials identified in a Cochrane review of the effectiveness of pharmacist interventions on patient health outcomes. Duplicate, independent application of a modified 15-item TIDieR checklist was undertaken to assess the intervention reporting. The reporting/non-reporting of TIDieR items was analysed with principal component analysis to evaluate the dimensionality of reporting quality and regression analyses to assess predictors of reporting quality RESULTS: In total, 422 (40%) TIDieR items were fully reported, 395 (38%) were partially reported and 231 (22%) were not reported. A further 242 items were deemed not applicable to the specific trials. Reporting quality loaded on one component which accounted for 26% of the variance in TIDieR scores. More recent trials reported a slightly greater number of TIDieR items (0.07 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.13) additional TIDieR items per year of publication). Trials reported an 0.09 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.14) additional TIDieR items per unit increase in impact factor (IF) of the journal in which the main report was published. CONCLUSIONS: Most trials lacked adequate intervention reporting. This diminished the applied and scientific value of their research. The standard of intervention reporting is, however, gradually increasing and appears somewhat better in journals with higher IFs. The use of the TIDieR checklist to improve reporting could enhance the utility and replicability of trials, and reduce research waste. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6937059/ /pubmed/31862736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025511 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice de Barra, Mícheál Scott, Claire Johnston, Marie De Bruin, M Scott, Neil Matheson, Catriona Bond, Christine Watson, Margaret Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review |
title | Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review |
title_full | Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review |
title_short | Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review |
title_sort | do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? a template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31862736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debarramicheal dopharmacyinterventionreportsadequatelydescribetheirinterventionsatemplateforinterventiondescriptionandreplicationanalysisofreportsincludedinasystematicreview AT scottclaire dopharmacyinterventionreportsadequatelydescribetheirinterventionsatemplateforinterventiondescriptionandreplicationanalysisofreportsincludedinasystematicreview AT johnstonmarie dopharmacyinterventionreportsadequatelydescribetheirinterventionsatemplateforinterventiondescriptionandreplicationanalysisofreportsincludedinasystematicreview AT debruinm dopharmacyinterventionreportsadequatelydescribetheirinterventionsatemplateforinterventiondescriptionandreplicationanalysisofreportsincludedinasystematicreview AT scottneil dopharmacyinterventionreportsadequatelydescribetheirinterventionsatemplateforinterventiondescriptionandreplicationanalysisofreportsincludedinasystematicreview AT mathesoncatriona dopharmacyinterventionreportsadequatelydescribetheirinterventionsatemplateforinterventiondescriptionandreplicationanalysisofreportsincludedinasystematicreview AT bondchristine dopharmacyinterventionreportsadequatelydescribetheirinterventionsatemplateforinterventiondescriptionandreplicationanalysisofreportsincludedinasystematicreview AT watsonmargaret dopharmacyinterventionreportsadequatelydescribetheirinterventionsatemplateforinterventiondescriptionandreplicationanalysisofreportsincludedinasystematicreview |