Cargando…

Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study

OBJECTIVE: To assess how lifestyle weight management programmes for children aged 4–16 years in England are commissioned and evaluated at the local level. DESIGN: This was a mixed-methods study comprising an online survey and semistructured telephone interviews. SETTING: An online survey was sent to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mears, Ruth, Jago, Russ, Sharp, Deborah, Patel, Anamica, Kipping, Ruth, Shield, Julian P H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31848157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025423
_version_ 1783483819758714880
author Mears, Ruth
Jago, Russ
Sharp, Deborah
Patel, Anamica
Kipping, Ruth
Shield, Julian P H
author_facet Mears, Ruth
Jago, Russ
Sharp, Deborah
Patel, Anamica
Kipping, Ruth
Shield, Julian P H
author_sort Mears, Ruth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess how lifestyle weight management programmes for children aged 4–16 years in England are commissioned and evaluated at the local level. DESIGN: This was a mixed-methods study comprising an online survey and semistructured telephone interviews. SETTING: An online survey was sent to all local authorities (LAs) in England regarding lifestyle weight management services commissioned for children aged 4–16 years. Online survey data were collected between February and May 2016 and based on services commissioned between April 2014 and March 2015. Semistructured telephone interviews with LA staff across England were conducted between April and June 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Commissioners or service providers working within the public health department of LAs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The online survey collected information on the evidence base, costs, reach, service usage and evaluation of child lifestyle weight management services. The telephone interviews explored the nature of child weight management contracts commissioned by LAs, the type of outcome data collected and whether these data were shared with other LAs or organisations, the challenges faced by these services, and the perceived ‘markers of success’ for a programme. RESULTS: The online survey showed that none of the participating LAs was aware of any peer-reviewed evidence supporting the effectiveness of their specific commissioned service. Despite this, the telephone interviews revealed that there was no national formal sharing of data to enable oversight of the effectiveness of commissioned services across LAs in England to help inform future commissioning decisions. Challenges with long-term data collection, service engagement, funding and the pressure to reduce the prevalence of obesity were frequently mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Robust, independent, cost-effectiveness analyses of obesity strategies are needed to determine the appropriate allocation of funding to lifestyle weight management treatment services, population-level preventative approaches or development of whole system approaches by an LA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6937081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69370812020-01-06 Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study Mears, Ruth Jago, Russ Sharp, Deborah Patel, Anamica Kipping, Ruth Shield, Julian P H BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To assess how lifestyle weight management programmes for children aged 4–16 years in England are commissioned and evaluated at the local level. DESIGN: This was a mixed-methods study comprising an online survey and semistructured telephone interviews. SETTING: An online survey was sent to all local authorities (LAs) in England regarding lifestyle weight management services commissioned for children aged 4–16 years. Online survey data were collected between February and May 2016 and based on services commissioned between April 2014 and March 2015. Semistructured telephone interviews with LA staff across England were conducted between April and June 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Commissioners or service providers working within the public health department of LAs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The online survey collected information on the evidence base, costs, reach, service usage and evaluation of child lifestyle weight management services. The telephone interviews explored the nature of child weight management contracts commissioned by LAs, the type of outcome data collected and whether these data were shared with other LAs or organisations, the challenges faced by these services, and the perceived ‘markers of success’ for a programme. RESULTS: The online survey showed that none of the participating LAs was aware of any peer-reviewed evidence supporting the effectiveness of their specific commissioned service. Despite this, the telephone interviews revealed that there was no national formal sharing of data to enable oversight of the effectiveness of commissioned services across LAs in England to help inform future commissioning decisions. Challenges with long-term data collection, service engagement, funding and the pressure to reduce the prevalence of obesity were frequently mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Robust, independent, cost-effectiveness analyses of obesity strategies are needed to determine the appropriate allocation of funding to lifestyle weight management treatment services, population-level preventative approaches or development of whole system approaches by an LA. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6937081/ /pubmed/31848157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025423 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Mears, Ruth
Jago, Russ
Sharp, Deborah
Patel, Anamica
Kipping, Ruth
Shield, Julian P H
Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_full Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_fullStr Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_short Exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in England: a mixed methodology study
title_sort exploring how lifestyle weight management programmes for children are commissioned and evaluated in england: a mixed methodology study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31848157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025423
work_keys_str_mv AT mearsruth exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT jagoruss exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT sharpdeborah exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT patelanamica exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT kippingruth exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy
AT shieldjulianph exploringhowlifestyleweightmanagementprogrammesforchildrenarecommissionedandevaluatedinenglandamixedmethodologystudy