Cargando…

Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care

BACKGROUND: Unintended shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are often distressing to patients and family members, particularly at the end of life. Unfortunately, a large proportion of ICDs remain active at the time of death among do not resuscitate (DNR) and comfort care patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Daniel Y, Wagner, Michael P, Yum, Brian, Jannat-Khah, Deanna Pereira, Mazique, Derek C, Crossman, Daniel J, Lee, Jennifer I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000730
_version_ 1783483825639129088
author Choi, Daniel Y
Wagner, Michael P
Yum, Brian
Jannat-Khah, Deanna Pereira
Mazique, Derek C
Crossman, Daniel J
Lee, Jennifer I
author_facet Choi, Daniel Y
Wagner, Michael P
Yum, Brian
Jannat-Khah, Deanna Pereira
Mazique, Derek C
Crossman, Daniel J
Lee, Jennifer I
author_sort Choi, Daniel Y
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unintended shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are often distressing to patients and family members, particularly at the end of life. Unfortunately, a large proportion of ICDs remain active at the time of death among do not resuscitate (DNR) and comfort care patients. METHODS: We designed standardised teaching sessions for providers and implemented a novel decision tool in the electronic medical record (EMR) to improve the frequency of discussions surrounding ICD deactivation over a 6-month period. The intended population was patients on inpatient medicine and cardiology services made DNR and/or comfort care. These rates were compared with retrospective data from 6 months prior to our interventions. RESULTS: After our interventions, the rates of discussions regarding deactivation of ICDs improved from 50% to 93% in comfort care patients and from 32% to 70% in DNR patients. The rates of deactivated ICDs improved from 45% to 73% in comfort care patients and from 29% to 40% in DNR patients. CONCLUSION: Standardised education of healthcare providers and decision support tools and reminders in the EMR system are effective ways to increase awareness, discussion and deactivation of ICDs in comfort care and DNR patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6937107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69371072020-01-09 Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care Choi, Daniel Y Wagner, Michael P Yum, Brian Jannat-Khah, Deanna Pereira Mazique, Derek C Crossman, Daniel J Lee, Jennifer I BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Unintended shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are often distressing to patients and family members, particularly at the end of life. Unfortunately, a large proportion of ICDs remain active at the time of death among do not resuscitate (DNR) and comfort care patients. METHODS: We designed standardised teaching sessions for providers and implemented a novel decision tool in the electronic medical record (EMR) to improve the frequency of discussions surrounding ICD deactivation over a 6-month period. The intended population was patients on inpatient medicine and cardiology services made DNR and/or comfort care. These rates were compared with retrospective data from 6 months prior to our interventions. RESULTS: After our interventions, the rates of discussions regarding deactivation of ICDs improved from 50% to 93% in comfort care patients and from 32% to 70% in DNR patients. The rates of deactivated ICDs improved from 45% to 73% in comfort care patients and from 29% to 40% in DNR patients. CONCLUSION: Standardised education of healthcare providers and decision support tools and reminders in the EMR system are effective ways to increase awareness, discussion and deactivation of ICDs in comfort care and DNR patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6937107/ /pubmed/31922034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000730 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Choi, Daniel Y
Wagner, Michael P
Yum, Brian
Jannat-Khah, Deanna Pereira
Mazique, Derek C
Crossman, Daniel J
Lee, Jennifer I
Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care
title Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care
title_full Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care
title_fullStr Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care
title_full_unstemmed Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care
title_short Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care
title_sort improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made dnr and comfort care
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000730
work_keys_str_mv AT choidaniely improvingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatordeactivationdiscussionsinadmittedpatientsmadednrandcomfortcare
AT wagnermichaelp improvingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatordeactivationdiscussionsinadmittedpatientsmadednrandcomfortcare
AT yumbrian improvingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatordeactivationdiscussionsinadmittedpatientsmadednrandcomfortcare
AT jannatkhahdeannapereira improvingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatordeactivationdiscussionsinadmittedpatientsmadednrandcomfortcare
AT maziquederekc improvingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatordeactivationdiscussionsinadmittedpatientsmadednrandcomfortcare
AT crossmandanielj improvingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatordeactivationdiscussionsinadmittedpatientsmadednrandcomfortcare
AT leejenniferi improvingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatordeactivationdiscussionsinadmittedpatientsmadednrandcomfortcare