Cargando…

Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was developed with the aim of further improving the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound. Although novel puncture needles have been specifically designed for collecting sufficient tissue specimens, clinical studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itonaga, Masahiro, Yasukawa, Satoru, Shimokawa, Toshio, Takenaka, Mamoru, Fukutake, Nobuyasu, Ogura, Takeshi, Sakagami, Junichi, Shiomi, Hideyuki, Okura, Yasushi, Inatomi, Osamu, Matsumoto, Hisakazu, Kurita, Akira, Suzuki, Azumi, Tanaka, Kiyohito, Kitano, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3946-7
_version_ 1783483915767382016
author Itonaga, Masahiro
Yasukawa, Satoru
Shimokawa, Toshio
Takenaka, Mamoru
Fukutake, Nobuyasu
Ogura, Takeshi
Sakagami, Junichi
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Okura, Yasushi
Inatomi, Osamu
Matsumoto, Hisakazu
Kurita, Akira
Suzuki, Azumi
Tanaka, Kiyohito
Kitano, Masayuki
author_facet Itonaga, Masahiro
Yasukawa, Satoru
Shimokawa, Toshio
Takenaka, Mamoru
Fukutake, Nobuyasu
Ogura, Takeshi
Sakagami, Junichi
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Okura, Yasushi
Inatomi, Osamu
Matsumoto, Hisakazu
Kurita, Akira
Suzuki, Azumi
Tanaka, Kiyohito
Kitano, Masayuki
author_sort Itonaga, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was developed with the aim of further improving the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound. Although novel puncture needles have been specifically designed for collecting sufficient tissue specimens, clinical studies have indicated no clear difference in diagnostic performance between these novel needles and conventional puncture needles. Recently, a needle with Franseen geometry was developed specifically for EUS-FNA biopsy. Due to the characteristic shape of its tip, the Franseen needle is expected to be effective for scraping tissues, thus potentially increasing the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA biopsy. We plan to carry out a prospective, multicenter, open-labeled, controlled trial to compare conventional and Franseen needles in terms of the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for evaluating the malignancy of pancreatic mass lesions. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will enroll 520 patients with pancreatic mass managed at any of 21 participating endoscopic centers. Lesion samples obtained using 22G conventional and Franseen needles will be assessed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two types of needles in EUS-FNA for evaluating the malignancy of mass lesions in the pancreas. Tissue samples will be fixed in formalin and processed for histologic evaluation. For the purpose of this study, only samples obtained with the first needle pass will be used for comparing the: (i) accuracy of the malignancy diagnosis, (ii) sensitivity and specificity for the malignancy diagnosis, (iii) procedure completion rate, (iv) sample cellularity, and (v) incidence of complications. Patient enrollment begins on July 17, 2018. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study may provide insight into the optimal needle choice for evaluating the malignancy of pancreatic solid lesions, thus aiding in the development of practice guidelines for pancreatic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), UMIN000030634. Registered on 29 December 2017. http://www.umin.ac.jp/ Version number: 01.2017.12.28.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6937695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69376952019-12-31 Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial Itonaga, Masahiro Yasukawa, Satoru Shimokawa, Toshio Takenaka, Mamoru Fukutake, Nobuyasu Ogura, Takeshi Sakagami, Junichi Shiomi, Hideyuki Okura, Yasushi Inatomi, Osamu Matsumoto, Hisakazu Kurita, Akira Suzuki, Azumi Tanaka, Kiyohito Kitano, Masayuki Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was developed with the aim of further improving the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound. Although novel puncture needles have been specifically designed for collecting sufficient tissue specimens, clinical studies have indicated no clear difference in diagnostic performance between these novel needles and conventional puncture needles. Recently, a needle with Franseen geometry was developed specifically for EUS-FNA biopsy. Due to the characteristic shape of its tip, the Franseen needle is expected to be effective for scraping tissues, thus potentially increasing the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA biopsy. We plan to carry out a prospective, multicenter, open-labeled, controlled trial to compare conventional and Franseen needles in terms of the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for evaluating the malignancy of pancreatic mass lesions. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will enroll 520 patients with pancreatic mass managed at any of 21 participating endoscopic centers. Lesion samples obtained using 22G conventional and Franseen needles will be assessed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two types of needles in EUS-FNA for evaluating the malignancy of mass lesions in the pancreas. Tissue samples will be fixed in formalin and processed for histologic evaluation. For the purpose of this study, only samples obtained with the first needle pass will be used for comparing the: (i) accuracy of the malignancy diagnosis, (ii) sensitivity and specificity for the malignancy diagnosis, (iii) procedure completion rate, (iv) sample cellularity, and (v) incidence of complications. Patient enrollment begins on July 17, 2018. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study may provide insight into the optimal needle choice for evaluating the malignancy of pancreatic solid lesions, thus aiding in the development of practice guidelines for pancreatic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), UMIN000030634. Registered on 29 December 2017. http://www.umin.ac.jp/ Version number: 01.2017.12.28. BioMed Central 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6937695/ /pubmed/31888733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3946-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Itonaga, Masahiro
Yasukawa, Satoru
Shimokawa, Toshio
Takenaka, Mamoru
Fukutake, Nobuyasu
Ogura, Takeshi
Sakagami, Junichi
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Okura, Yasushi
Inatomi, Osamu
Matsumoto, Hisakazu
Kurita, Akira
Suzuki, Azumi
Tanaka, Kiyohito
Kitano, Masayuki
Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial
title Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial
title_full Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial
title_short Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial
title_sort comparison of 22g standard and franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: study protocol for a controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3946-7
work_keys_str_mv AT itonagamasahiro comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT yasukawasatoru comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT shimokawatoshio comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT takenakamamoru comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT fukutakenobuyasu comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT oguratakeshi comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT sakagamijunichi comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT shiomihideyuki comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT okurayasushi comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT inatomiosamu comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT matsumotohisakazu comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT kuritaakira comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT suzukiazumi comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT tanakakiyohito comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial
AT kitanomasayuki comparisonof22gstandardandfranseenneedlesinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationfordiagnosingpancreaticmasslesionsstudyprotocolforacontrolledtrial