Cargando…
Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review
Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4 |
_version_ | 1783483950237220864 |
---|---|
author | Cuparencu, Cătălina Praticó, Giulia Hemeryck, Lieselot Y. Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C. Noerman, Stefania Rombouts, Caroline Xi, Muyao Vanhaecke, Lynn Hanhineva, Kati Brennan, Lorraine Dragsted, Lars O. |
author_facet | Cuparencu, Cătălina Praticó, Giulia Hemeryck, Lieselot Y. Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C. Noerman, Stefania Rombouts, Caroline Xi, Muyao Vanhaecke, Lynn Hanhineva, Kati Brennan, Lorraine Dragsted, Lars O. |
author_sort | Cuparencu, Cătălina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases. The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev). The most promising biomarkers are further validated for their usefulness for dietary assessment by published validation criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6937850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69378502020-01-06 Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review Cuparencu, Cătălina Praticó, Giulia Hemeryck, Lieselot Y. Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C. Noerman, Stefania Rombouts, Caroline Xi, Muyao Vanhaecke, Lynn Hanhineva, Kati Brennan, Lorraine Dragsted, Lars O. Genes Nutr Review Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases. The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev). The most promising biomarkers are further validated for their usefulness for dietary assessment by published validation criteria. BioMed Central 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6937850/ /pubmed/31908682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Cuparencu, Cătălina Praticó, Giulia Hemeryck, Lieselot Y. Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C. Noerman, Stefania Rombouts, Caroline Xi, Muyao Vanhaecke, Lynn Hanhineva, Kati Brennan, Lorraine Dragsted, Lars O. Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review |
title | Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review |
title_full | Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review |
title_fullStr | Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review |
title_short | Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review |
title_sort | biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuparencucatalina biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT praticogiulia biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT hemerycklieseloty biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT sriharshapedapatisc biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT noermanstefania biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT romboutscaroline biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT ximuyao biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT vanhaeckelynn biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT hanhinevakati biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT brennanlorraine biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview AT dragstedlarso biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview |