Cargando…

Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review

Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuparencu, Cătălina, Praticó, Giulia, Hemeryck, Lieselot Y., Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C., Noerman, Stefania, Rombouts, Caroline, Xi, Muyao, Vanhaecke, Lynn, Hanhineva, Kati, Brennan, Lorraine, Dragsted, Lars O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4
_version_ 1783483950237220864
author Cuparencu, Cătălina
Praticó, Giulia
Hemeryck, Lieselot Y.
Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C.
Noerman, Stefania
Rombouts, Caroline
Xi, Muyao
Vanhaecke, Lynn
Hanhineva, Kati
Brennan, Lorraine
Dragsted, Lars O.
author_facet Cuparencu, Cătălina
Praticó, Giulia
Hemeryck, Lieselot Y.
Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C.
Noerman, Stefania
Rombouts, Caroline
Xi, Muyao
Vanhaecke, Lynn
Hanhineva, Kati
Brennan, Lorraine
Dragsted, Lars O.
author_sort Cuparencu, Cătălina
collection PubMed
description Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases. The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev). The most promising biomarkers are further validated for their usefulness for dietary assessment by published validation criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6937850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69378502020-01-06 Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review Cuparencu, Cătălina Praticó, Giulia Hemeryck, Lieselot Y. Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C. Noerman, Stefania Rombouts, Caroline Xi, Muyao Vanhaecke, Lynn Hanhineva, Kati Brennan, Lorraine Dragsted, Lars O. Genes Nutr Review Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases. The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev). The most promising biomarkers are further validated for their usefulness for dietary assessment by published validation criteria. BioMed Central 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6937850/ /pubmed/31908682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Cuparencu, Cătălina
Praticó, Giulia
Hemeryck, Lieselot Y.
Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C.
Noerman, Stefania
Rombouts, Caroline
Xi, Muyao
Vanhaecke, Lynn
Hanhineva, Kati
Brennan, Lorraine
Dragsted, Lars O.
Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review
title Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review
title_full Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review
title_fullStr Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review
title_short Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review
title_sort biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4
work_keys_str_mv AT cuparencucatalina biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT praticogiulia biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT hemerycklieseloty biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT sriharshapedapatisc biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT noermanstefania biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT romboutscaroline biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT ximuyao biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT vanhaeckelynn biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT hanhinevakati biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT brennanlorraine biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview
AT dragstedlarso biomarkersofmeatandseafoodintakeanextensiveliteraturereview