Cargando…

Dexmedetomidine Compared to Remifentanil Infusion as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of postoperative (PO) analgesic effects of intraoperative (IO) Dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared to remifentanil (REMI) infusions during sevoflurane anesthesia for laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with body mass index...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamed, Jehan M. E., Refaat, Hesham S. M., Al-Wadaani, Hamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009708
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_126_19
_version_ 1783483959017996288
author Hamed, Jehan M. E.
Refaat, Hesham S. M.
Al-Wadaani, Hamed
author_facet Hamed, Jehan M. E.
Refaat, Hesham S. M.
Al-Wadaani, Hamed
author_sort Hamed, Jehan M. E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of postoperative (PO) analgesic effects of intraoperative (IO) Dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared to remifentanil (REMI) infusions during sevoflurane anesthesia for laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with body mass index >35 kg.m(-2) and ASA Grades II or III were randomly divided into group R received REMI infusion (6–18 μg.kg(-1).h(-1)) and Group D received DEX infusion (0.2–0.5 μg.kg(-1).h(-1)) after tracheal intubation till before stoppage of inhalational anesthetic. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were noninvasively monitored during and after surgery. Emergence time, time until postanesthetic care unit transfer, and total operating room (OR) time was recorded. PO shoulder-tip pain and wound pain scores were recorded and rescue analgesia was provided as 50 mg pethidine intramuscular injection. Occurrence of PO nausea and vomiting (PONV) and frequency of the need for antiemetic therapy were recorded. Primary study outcome was the ability of the study infusions to reduce consumption of PO pethidine down to one dose during 24-hr PO. RESULTS: IO use of REMI or DEX infusion allowed hemodynamic control to surgical stresses with nonsignificant difference between both infusions. REMI infusion insured significantly rapid recovery and short OR times but required larger volume of sevoflurane during surgery and proper PO follow-up for pain and PONV. DEX infusion significantly improved control of PO pain with a larger number of patient requested rescue analgesia only once, reduced the dose of PO analgesia, reduced the frequency of PONV, and the need for antiemetic therapy. CONCLUSION: REMI or DEX infusion as IO adjuvant to general anesthesia is appropriate option to achieve hemodynamic control of surgical stresses and to improve perioperative outcomes. REMI infusion may be preferred for its induced rapid recovery and short OR time, whereas DEX infusion may be chosen for its improved control of PO pain and reduction of PO analgesia and frequency of PONV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6937887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69378872020-01-31 Dexmedetomidine Compared to Remifentanil Infusion as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Hamed, Jehan M. E. Refaat, Hesham S. M. Al-Wadaani, Hamed Anesth Essays Res Original Article OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of postoperative (PO) analgesic effects of intraoperative (IO) Dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared to remifentanil (REMI) infusions during sevoflurane anesthesia for laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with body mass index >35 kg.m(-2) and ASA Grades II or III were randomly divided into group R received REMI infusion (6–18 μg.kg(-1).h(-1)) and Group D received DEX infusion (0.2–0.5 μg.kg(-1).h(-1)) after tracheal intubation till before stoppage of inhalational anesthetic. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were noninvasively monitored during and after surgery. Emergence time, time until postanesthetic care unit transfer, and total operating room (OR) time was recorded. PO shoulder-tip pain and wound pain scores were recorded and rescue analgesia was provided as 50 mg pethidine intramuscular injection. Occurrence of PO nausea and vomiting (PONV) and frequency of the need for antiemetic therapy were recorded. Primary study outcome was the ability of the study infusions to reduce consumption of PO pethidine down to one dose during 24-hr PO. RESULTS: IO use of REMI or DEX infusion allowed hemodynamic control to surgical stresses with nonsignificant difference between both infusions. REMI infusion insured significantly rapid recovery and short OR times but required larger volume of sevoflurane during surgery and proper PO follow-up for pain and PONV. DEX infusion significantly improved control of PO pain with a larger number of patient requested rescue analgesia only once, reduced the dose of PO analgesia, reduced the frequency of PONV, and the need for antiemetic therapy. CONCLUSION: REMI or DEX infusion as IO adjuvant to general anesthesia is appropriate option to achieve hemodynamic control of surgical stresses and to improve perioperative outcomes. REMI infusion may be preferred for its induced rapid recovery and short OR time, whereas DEX infusion may be chosen for its improved control of PO pain and reduction of PO analgesia and frequency of PONV. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6937887/ /pubmed/32009708 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_126_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hamed, Jehan M. E.
Refaat, Hesham S. M.
Al-Wadaani, Hamed
Dexmedetomidine Compared to Remifentanil Infusion as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
title Dexmedetomidine Compared to Remifentanil Infusion as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_full Dexmedetomidine Compared to Remifentanil Infusion as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_fullStr Dexmedetomidine Compared to Remifentanil Infusion as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Dexmedetomidine Compared to Remifentanil Infusion as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_short Dexmedetomidine Compared to Remifentanil Infusion as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_sort dexmedetomidine compared to remifentanil infusion as adjuvant to sevoflurane anesthesia during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009708
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_126_19
work_keys_str_mv AT hamedjehanme dexmedetomidinecomparedtoremifentanilinfusionasadjuvanttosevofluraneanesthesiaduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomy
AT refaatheshamsm dexmedetomidinecomparedtoremifentanilinfusionasadjuvanttosevofluraneanesthesiaduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomy
AT alwadaanihamed dexmedetomidinecomparedtoremifentanilinfusionasadjuvanttosevofluraneanesthesiaduringlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomy