Cargando…

On the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use

BACKGROUND: Since walking is a daily activity not to require the maximal effort in healthy populations, a very few universal bio-parameters and/or methods have been defined to evaluate individual walking characteristics in those populations. A concept of “economy” is a potential candidate; however,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Daijiro, Fukuoka, Yoshiyuki, Horiuchi, Masahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-019-0211-4
_version_ 1783483963999780864
author Abe, Daijiro
Fukuoka, Yoshiyuki
Horiuchi, Masahiro
author_facet Abe, Daijiro
Fukuoka, Yoshiyuki
Horiuchi, Masahiro
author_sort Abe, Daijiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since walking is a daily activity not to require the maximal effort in healthy populations, a very few universal bio-parameters and/or methods have been defined to evaluate individual walking characteristics in those populations. A concept of “economy” is a potential candidate; however, walking economy highly depends on speed, so direct comparisons of economy values are difficult between studies. We investigated whether the vertical component of net walking “efficiency” (Eff(vert); %) is constant across speed. In that case, direct comparisons of Eff(vert) will be possible between studies or individuals at any voluntary speed. METHODS: Thirty young male participants walked at eight speeds on the level or ± 5% gradients, providing vertical speeds (v(vert)). Differences in energy expenditure between level and uphill or downhill gradients (ΔEE) were calculated. The metabolic rate for vertical component (MR(vert)) was calculated by multiplying ΔEE with body mass (BM). The mechanical power output for vertical component (P(mech)) was calculated by multiplying BM, gravitational acceleration, and v(vert). Eff(vert) was obtained from the ratio of P(mech) to MR(vert) at each v(vert). Delta efficiency (Delta-E; %) was also calculated from the inverse slope of the regression line representing the relationship of P(mech) to MR(vert). RESULTS: Upward Eff(vert) was nearly constant at around 35% and downward Eff(vert) ranged widely (49–80%). No significant differences were observed between upward Delta-E (35.5 ± 8.8%) and Eff(vert) at any speeds, but not between downward Delta-E (44.9 ± 12.8%) and Eff(vert). CONCLUSIONS: Upward ΔEE could be proportional to v(vert). Upward, but not downward, Eff(vert) should be useful not only for healthy populations but also for clinical patients to evaluate individual gait characteristics, because it requires only two metabolic measurements on the level and uphill gradients without kinematic information at any voluntary speed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000017690 (R000020501; registered May 26th, 2015, before the first trial) and UMIN000031456 (R000035911; registered Feb. 23rd, 2018, before the first trial).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6937908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69379082019-12-31 On the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use Abe, Daijiro Fukuoka, Yoshiyuki Horiuchi, Masahiro J Physiol Anthropol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Since walking is a daily activity not to require the maximal effort in healthy populations, a very few universal bio-parameters and/or methods have been defined to evaluate individual walking characteristics in those populations. A concept of “economy” is a potential candidate; however, walking economy highly depends on speed, so direct comparisons of economy values are difficult between studies. We investigated whether the vertical component of net walking “efficiency” (Eff(vert); %) is constant across speed. In that case, direct comparisons of Eff(vert) will be possible between studies or individuals at any voluntary speed. METHODS: Thirty young male participants walked at eight speeds on the level or ± 5% gradients, providing vertical speeds (v(vert)). Differences in energy expenditure between level and uphill or downhill gradients (ΔEE) were calculated. The metabolic rate for vertical component (MR(vert)) was calculated by multiplying ΔEE with body mass (BM). The mechanical power output for vertical component (P(mech)) was calculated by multiplying BM, gravitational acceleration, and v(vert). Eff(vert) was obtained from the ratio of P(mech) to MR(vert) at each v(vert). Delta efficiency (Delta-E; %) was also calculated from the inverse slope of the regression line representing the relationship of P(mech) to MR(vert). RESULTS: Upward Eff(vert) was nearly constant at around 35% and downward Eff(vert) ranged widely (49–80%). No significant differences were observed between upward Delta-E (35.5 ± 8.8%) and Eff(vert) at any speeds, but not between downward Delta-E (44.9 ± 12.8%) and Eff(vert). CONCLUSIONS: Upward ΔEE could be proportional to v(vert). Upward, but not downward, Eff(vert) should be useful not only for healthy populations but also for clinical patients to evaluate individual gait characteristics, because it requires only two metabolic measurements on the level and uphill gradients without kinematic information at any voluntary speed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000017690 (R000020501; registered May 26th, 2015, before the first trial) and UMIN000031456 (R000035911; registered Feb. 23rd, 2018, before the first trial). BioMed Central 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6937908/ /pubmed/31888750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-019-0211-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Abe, Daijiro
Fukuoka, Yoshiyuki
Horiuchi, Masahiro
On the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use
title On the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use
title_full On the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use
title_fullStr On the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use
title_full_unstemmed On the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use
title_short On the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use
title_sort on the simple calculation of walking efficiency without kinematic information for its convenient use
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-019-0211-4
work_keys_str_mv AT abedaijiro onthesimplecalculationofwalkingefficiencywithoutkinematicinformationforitsconvenientuse
AT fukuokayoshiyuki onthesimplecalculationofwalkingefficiencywithoutkinematicinformationforitsconvenientuse
AT horiuchimasahiro onthesimplecalculationofwalkingefficiencywithoutkinematicinformationforitsconvenientuse