Cargando…

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of prospective studies comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Also, the effects of bariatric surgery and weight loss need a deeper understanding through metabolic studies. We describe the trial protocol and interim analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saarinen, Tuure, Meriläinen, Sanna, Koivukangas, Vesa, Pietiläinen, Kirsi Hannele, Juuti, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3898-y
_version_ 1783483966165090304
author Saarinen, Tuure
Meriläinen, Sanna
Koivukangas, Vesa
Pietiläinen, Kirsi Hannele
Juuti, Anne
author_facet Saarinen, Tuure
Meriläinen, Sanna
Koivukangas, Vesa
Pietiläinen, Kirsi Hannele
Juuti, Anne
author_sort Saarinen, Tuure
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of prospective studies comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Also, the effects of bariatric surgery and weight loss need a deeper understanding through metabolic studies. We describe the trial protocol and interim analysis of a prospective randomized controlled study comparing RYGB and OAGB: the RYSA trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 120 bariatric patients will be randomized between RYGB and OAGB in two academic centers. All patients will be followed up for 10 years with analysis and measurements of weight, comorbidities, blood tests, body composition and questionnaires. Extensive metabolic analyses (mixed meal tests, energy expenditure, biopsies of muscle and subcutaneous fat, urine, saliva and fecal samples) will be carried out in the Obesity Research Unit, University of Helsinki, for all patients treated at the Helsinki University Hospital (80 patients) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Bile reflux will be studied for the OAGB group at the Helsinki University Hospital at 6 months with gastroscopy and scintigraphy. RESULTS: At an interim analysis at 3 months (half-way) through recruitment (30 RYGB and 30 OAGB patients) there have been no deaths and no intensive care unit admittances. One patient in both groups required additional gastroscopy, with anastomosis dilatation in the RYGB group but with no additional intervention in the OAGB group. CONCLUSION: The trial can be safely carried out. Recruitment is estimated to be complete by the end of 2019. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Identifier NCT02882685. Registered on August 30th 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6937917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69379172019-12-31 Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis Saarinen, Tuure Meriläinen, Sanna Koivukangas, Vesa Pietiläinen, Kirsi Hannele Juuti, Anne Trials Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of prospective studies comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Also, the effects of bariatric surgery and weight loss need a deeper understanding through metabolic studies. We describe the trial protocol and interim analysis of a prospective randomized controlled study comparing RYGB and OAGB: the RYSA trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 120 bariatric patients will be randomized between RYGB and OAGB in two academic centers. All patients will be followed up for 10 years with analysis and measurements of weight, comorbidities, blood tests, body composition and questionnaires. Extensive metabolic analyses (mixed meal tests, energy expenditure, biopsies of muscle and subcutaneous fat, urine, saliva and fecal samples) will be carried out in the Obesity Research Unit, University of Helsinki, for all patients treated at the Helsinki University Hospital (80 patients) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Bile reflux will be studied for the OAGB group at the Helsinki University Hospital at 6 months with gastroscopy and scintigraphy. RESULTS: At an interim analysis at 3 months (half-way) through recruitment (30 RYGB and 30 OAGB patients) there have been no deaths and no intensive care unit admittances. One patient in both groups required additional gastroscopy, with anastomosis dilatation in the RYGB group but with no additional intervention in the OAGB group. CONCLUSION: The trial can be safely carried out. Recruitment is estimated to be complete by the end of 2019. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Identifier NCT02882685. Registered on August 30th 2016. BioMed Central 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6937917/ /pubmed/31888729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3898-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Saarinen, Tuure
Meriläinen, Sanna
Koivukangas, Vesa
Pietiläinen, Kirsi Hannele
Juuti, Anne
Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis
title Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis
title_full Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis
title_fullStr Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis
title_short Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis
title_sort prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of roux-en-y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the rysa trial): trial protocol and interim analysis
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3898-y
work_keys_str_mv AT saarinentuure prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofrouxenygastricbypassandoneanastomosisgastricbypasstherysatrialtrialprotocolandinterimanalysis
AT merilainensanna prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofrouxenygastricbypassandoneanastomosisgastricbypasstherysatrialtrialprotocolandinterimanalysis
AT koivukangasvesa prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofrouxenygastricbypassandoneanastomosisgastricbypasstherysatrialtrialprotocolandinterimanalysis
AT pietilainenkirsihannele prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofrouxenygastricbypassandoneanastomosisgastricbypasstherysatrialtrialprotocolandinterimanalysis
AT juutianne prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofrouxenygastricbypassandoneanastomosisgastricbypasstherysatrialtrialprotocolandinterimanalysis