Cargando…

Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers

BACKGROUND: Front-of-package labelling is a cost-effective strategy to help consumers make healthier choices and informed food purchases. The effect of labels is mediated by consumer understanding and acceptability of the label. We compared the acceptability and understanding of labels used in Latin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vargas-Meza, Jorge, Jáuregui, Alejandra, Contreras-Manzano, Alejandra, Nieto, Claudia, Barquera, Simón
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8108-z
_version_ 1783483987931430912
author Vargas-Meza, Jorge
Jáuregui, Alejandra
Contreras-Manzano, Alejandra
Nieto, Claudia
Barquera, Simón
author_facet Vargas-Meza, Jorge
Jáuregui, Alejandra
Contreras-Manzano, Alejandra
Nieto, Claudia
Barquera, Simón
author_sort Vargas-Meza, Jorge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Front-of-package labelling is a cost-effective strategy to help consumers make healthier choices and informed food purchases. The effect of labels is mediated by consumer understanding and acceptability of the label. We compared the acceptability and understanding of labels used in Latin-America among low- and middle-income Mexican adults. METHODS: Participants (n = 2105) were randomly assigned to one of three labels: Mexican Guideline Daily Allowances (GDA), Ecuador’s Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), or Chile’s Warning Labels (WL) in red. Label acceptability was evaluated through items regarding likeability, attractiveness and perceived cognitive workload. Objective understanding was evaluated by asking participants to select the product with the lowest nutritional quality among three products. We measured the time participants took to choose the product. Differences in label acceptability, understanding and time required to choose a product across labels were tested. RESULTS: Compared to the GDA, a higher proportion of participants liked the MTL and WL, considered them attractive, and with a lower perceived cognitive workload (p < 0.05). Participants had 4.00 (2.86–5.59) times the odds of correctly identifying the product with the lowest nutritional quality when using the MTL label and 4.52 (3.24–6.29) times the odds when using the WL, in comparison to the GDA. Time required to choose the product was lower for the MTL (Median: 11.25 s; IQR = 8.00–16.09) and the WL (Median = 11.94 s, IQR = 8.56–16.52) compared to the GDA (Median: 15.31 s; IQR = 10.81–20.21; p < 0.05). No differences were observed between the MTL and the WL. CONCLUSIONS: GDA had the lowest acceptability and understanding among the labels tested. The MTL and the WL were more accepted and understood, and allowed low- and middle-income consumers to make nutrition-quality related decisions more quickly. WL or MTL may foster healthier food choices in the most vulnerable groups in Mexico compared to the current labelling format.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69380092019-12-31 Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers Vargas-Meza, Jorge Jáuregui, Alejandra Contreras-Manzano, Alejandra Nieto, Claudia Barquera, Simón BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Front-of-package labelling is a cost-effective strategy to help consumers make healthier choices and informed food purchases. The effect of labels is mediated by consumer understanding and acceptability of the label. We compared the acceptability and understanding of labels used in Latin-America among low- and middle-income Mexican adults. METHODS: Participants (n = 2105) were randomly assigned to one of three labels: Mexican Guideline Daily Allowances (GDA), Ecuador’s Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), or Chile’s Warning Labels (WL) in red. Label acceptability was evaluated through items regarding likeability, attractiveness and perceived cognitive workload. Objective understanding was evaluated by asking participants to select the product with the lowest nutritional quality among three products. We measured the time participants took to choose the product. Differences in label acceptability, understanding and time required to choose a product across labels were tested. RESULTS: Compared to the GDA, a higher proportion of participants liked the MTL and WL, considered them attractive, and with a lower perceived cognitive workload (p < 0.05). Participants had 4.00 (2.86–5.59) times the odds of correctly identifying the product with the lowest nutritional quality when using the MTL label and 4.52 (3.24–6.29) times the odds when using the WL, in comparison to the GDA. Time required to choose the product was lower for the MTL (Median: 11.25 s; IQR = 8.00–16.09) and the WL (Median = 11.94 s, IQR = 8.56–16.52) compared to the GDA (Median: 15.31 s; IQR = 10.81–20.21; p < 0.05). No differences were observed between the MTL and the WL. CONCLUSIONS: GDA had the lowest acceptability and understanding among the labels tested. The MTL and the WL were more accepted and understood, and allowed low- and middle-income consumers to make nutrition-quality related decisions more quickly. WL or MTL may foster healthier food choices in the most vulnerable groups in Mexico compared to the current labelling format. BioMed Central 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6938009/ /pubmed/31888575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8108-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vargas-Meza, Jorge
Jáuregui, Alejandra
Contreras-Manzano, Alejandra
Nieto, Claudia
Barquera, Simón
Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers
title Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers
title_full Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers
title_fullStr Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers
title_short Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers
title_sort acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in mexican consumers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8108-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vargasmezajorge acceptabilityandunderstandingoffrontofpacknutritionallabelsanexperimentalstudyinmexicanconsumers
AT jaureguialejandra acceptabilityandunderstandingoffrontofpacknutritionallabelsanexperimentalstudyinmexicanconsumers
AT contrerasmanzanoalejandra acceptabilityandunderstandingoffrontofpacknutritionallabelsanexperimentalstudyinmexicanconsumers
AT nietoclaudia acceptabilityandunderstandingoffrontofpacknutritionallabelsanexperimentalstudyinmexicanconsumers
AT barquerasimon acceptabilityandunderstandingoffrontofpacknutritionallabelsanexperimentalstudyinmexicanconsumers