Cargando…

Revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling

The most frequently used approach for protein structure prediction is currently homology modeling. The 3D model building phase of this methodology is critical for obtaining an accurate and biologically useful prediction. The most widely employed tool to perform this task is MODELLER. This program im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janson, Giacomo, Grottesi, Alessandro, Pietrosanto, Marco, Ausiello, Gabriele, Guarguaglini, Giulia, Paiardini, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31846452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007219
_version_ 1783484029123690496
author Janson, Giacomo
Grottesi, Alessandro
Pietrosanto, Marco
Ausiello, Gabriele
Guarguaglini, Giulia
Paiardini, Alessandro
author_facet Janson, Giacomo
Grottesi, Alessandro
Pietrosanto, Marco
Ausiello, Gabriele
Guarguaglini, Giulia
Paiardini, Alessandro
author_sort Janson, Giacomo
collection PubMed
description The most frequently used approach for protein structure prediction is currently homology modeling. The 3D model building phase of this methodology is critical for obtaining an accurate and biologically useful prediction. The most widely employed tool to perform this task is MODELLER. This program implements the “modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints” strategy and its core algorithm has not been altered significantly since the early 1990s. In this work, we have explored the idea of modifying MODELLER with two effective, yet computationally light strategies to improve its 3D modeling performance. Firstly, we have investigated how the level of accuracy in the estimation of structural variability between a target protein and its templates in the form of σ values profoundly influences 3D modeling. We show that the σ values produced by MODELLER are on average weakly correlated to the true level of structural divergence between target-template pairs and that increasing this correlation greatly improves the program’s predictions, especially in multiple-template modeling. Secondly, we have inquired into how the incorporation of statistical potential terms (such as the DOPE potential) in the MODELLER’s objective function impacts positively 3D modeling quality by providing a small but consistent improvement in metrics such as GDT-HA and lDDT and a large increase in stereochemical quality. Python modules to harness this second strategy are freely available at https://github.com/pymodproject/altmod. In summary, we show that there is a large room for improving MODELLER in terms of 3D modeling quality and we propose strategies that could be pursued in order to further increase its performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69383802020-01-07 Revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling Janson, Giacomo Grottesi, Alessandro Pietrosanto, Marco Ausiello, Gabriele Guarguaglini, Giulia Paiardini, Alessandro PLoS Comput Biol Research Article The most frequently used approach for protein structure prediction is currently homology modeling. The 3D model building phase of this methodology is critical for obtaining an accurate and biologically useful prediction. The most widely employed tool to perform this task is MODELLER. This program implements the “modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints” strategy and its core algorithm has not been altered significantly since the early 1990s. In this work, we have explored the idea of modifying MODELLER with two effective, yet computationally light strategies to improve its 3D modeling performance. Firstly, we have investigated how the level of accuracy in the estimation of structural variability between a target protein and its templates in the form of σ values profoundly influences 3D modeling. We show that the σ values produced by MODELLER are on average weakly correlated to the true level of structural divergence between target-template pairs and that increasing this correlation greatly improves the program’s predictions, especially in multiple-template modeling. Secondly, we have inquired into how the incorporation of statistical potential terms (such as the DOPE potential) in the MODELLER’s objective function impacts positively 3D modeling quality by providing a small but consistent improvement in metrics such as GDT-HA and lDDT and a large increase in stereochemical quality. Python modules to harness this second strategy are freely available at https://github.com/pymodproject/altmod. In summary, we show that there is a large room for improving MODELLER in terms of 3D modeling quality and we propose strategies that could be pursued in order to further increase its performance. Public Library of Science 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6938380/ /pubmed/31846452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007219 Text en © 2019 Janson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Janson, Giacomo
Grottesi, Alessandro
Pietrosanto, Marco
Ausiello, Gabriele
Guarguaglini, Giulia
Paiardini, Alessandro
Revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling
title Revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling
title_full Revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling
title_fullStr Revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling
title_short Revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling
title_sort revisiting the “satisfaction of spatial restraints” approach of modeller for protein homology modeling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31846452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007219
work_keys_str_mv AT jansongiacomo revisitingthesatisfactionofspatialrestraintsapproachofmodellerforproteinhomologymodeling
AT grottesialessandro revisitingthesatisfactionofspatialrestraintsapproachofmodellerforproteinhomologymodeling
AT pietrosantomarco revisitingthesatisfactionofspatialrestraintsapproachofmodellerforproteinhomologymodeling
AT ausiellogabriele revisitingthesatisfactionofspatialrestraintsapproachofmodellerforproteinhomologymodeling
AT guarguaglinigiulia revisitingthesatisfactionofspatialrestraintsapproachofmodellerforproteinhomologymodeling
AT paiardinialessandro revisitingthesatisfactionofspatialrestraintsapproachofmodellerforproteinhomologymodeling