Cargando…

Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study

Objective  The objective of this study was to quantify the amount of debris apically extruded after instrumentation with two reciprocating systems. Materials and Methods  Forty-two single-rooted mandibular premolars with only one straight root canal and apical diameter compatible with a no. 15 K-fil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amaral, Andressa Pinho, Limongi, Patrícia Bastos Oliveira Conceição, Fontana, Carlos Eduardo, Martin, Alexandre Sigrist De, Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da Silveira, Pinheiro, Sérgio Luiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31891980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400550
_version_ 1783484038879641600
author Amaral, Andressa Pinho
Limongi, Patrícia Bastos Oliveira Conceição
Fontana, Carlos Eduardo
Martin, Alexandre Sigrist De
Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da Silveira
Pinheiro, Sérgio Luiz
author_facet Amaral, Andressa Pinho
Limongi, Patrícia Bastos Oliveira Conceição
Fontana, Carlos Eduardo
Martin, Alexandre Sigrist De
Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da Silveira
Pinheiro, Sérgio Luiz
author_sort Amaral, Andressa Pinho
collection PubMed
description Objective  The objective of this study was to quantify the amount of debris apically extruded after instrumentation with two reciprocating systems. Materials and Methods  Forty-two single-rooted mandibular premolars with only one straight root canal and apical diameter compatible with a no. 15 K-file were randomly divided into two groups ( n  = 21) according to the instrument used: ProDesign R (Easy Equipamentos; Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) and Reciproc Blue (VDW; Munich, Germany). Dry Eppendorf tubes were weighed three consecutive times for the initial mean weight. A silicone stopper was then fitted into the mouth of the tube. Each tooth was inserted through the stopper up to the cementoenamel junction and instrumented with one of the two systems to the predetermined working length (18 mm). The root canals were instrumented per root thirds. At each instrumented root third, the canal was irrigated with 3 mL of double-distilled water, followed by patency control. Each stopper was then separated from the tube and tubes were incubated at 70°C for 5 days. Tubes were again weighed, and the amount of extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial mean weight from the final mean weight. Statistical Analysis  Results were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test at a 5% significance level. Results  No significant difference was observed in debris extrusion between the ProDesign R and Reciproc Blue systems ( p = 0.7557). Conclusions  The two reciprocating systems tested produced similar amounts of postinstrumentation apically extruded debris.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69384322020-01-06 Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study Amaral, Andressa Pinho Limongi, Patrícia Bastos Oliveira Conceição Fontana, Carlos Eduardo Martin, Alexandre Sigrist De Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da Silveira Pinheiro, Sérgio Luiz Eur J Dent Objective  The objective of this study was to quantify the amount of debris apically extruded after instrumentation with two reciprocating systems. Materials and Methods  Forty-two single-rooted mandibular premolars with only one straight root canal and apical diameter compatible with a no. 15 K-file were randomly divided into two groups ( n  = 21) according to the instrument used: ProDesign R (Easy Equipamentos; Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) and Reciproc Blue (VDW; Munich, Germany). Dry Eppendorf tubes were weighed three consecutive times for the initial mean weight. A silicone stopper was then fitted into the mouth of the tube. Each tooth was inserted through the stopper up to the cementoenamel junction and instrumented with one of the two systems to the predetermined working length (18 mm). The root canals were instrumented per root thirds. At each instrumented root third, the canal was irrigated with 3 mL of double-distilled water, followed by patency control. Each stopper was then separated from the tube and tubes were incubated at 70°C for 5 days. Tubes were again weighed, and the amount of extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial mean weight from the final mean weight. Statistical Analysis  Results were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test at a 5% significance level. Results  No significant difference was observed in debris extrusion between the ProDesign R and Reciproc Blue systems ( p = 0.7557). Conclusions  The two reciprocating systems tested produced similar amounts of postinstrumentation apically extruded debris. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019-10 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6938432/ /pubmed/31891980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400550 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Amaral, Andressa Pinho
Limongi, Patrícia Bastos Oliveira Conceição
Fontana, Carlos Eduardo
Martin, Alexandre Sigrist De
Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da Silveira
Pinheiro, Sérgio Luiz
Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study
title Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study
title_full Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study
title_fullStr Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study
title_short Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study
title_sort debris apically extruded by two reciprocating systems: a comparative quantitative study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31891980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400550
work_keys_str_mv AT amaralandressapinho debrisapicallyextrudedbytworeciprocatingsystemsacomparativequantitativestudy
AT limongipatriciabastosoliveiraconceicao debrisapicallyextrudedbytworeciprocatingsystemsacomparativequantitativestudy
AT fontanacarloseduardo debrisapicallyextrudedbytworeciprocatingsystemsacomparativequantitativestudy
AT martinalexandresigristde debrisapicallyextrudedbytworeciprocatingsystemsacomparativequantitativestudy
AT buenocarloseduardodasilveira debrisapicallyextrudedbytworeciprocatingsystemsacomparativequantitativestudy
AT pinheirosergioluiz debrisapicallyextrudedbytworeciprocatingsystemsacomparativequantitativestudy