Cargando…

Fluorescence and Opalescence of Two Dental Composite Resins

Objective  Lifelike esthetic appearance of dental restorations is among the main goals in restorative dentistry. This study aimed to assess and compare the opalescence and fluorescence of two dental composite resins. Materials and Methods  This in vitro experimental study evaluated the A2 shade of F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabatabaei, Masoomeh Hasani, Nahavandi, Alireza Mahmoudi, Khorshidi, Sotude, Hashemikamangar, Sedighe Sadat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31891970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696899
_version_ 1783484041250471936
author Tabatabaei, Masoomeh Hasani
Nahavandi, Alireza Mahmoudi
Khorshidi, Sotude
Hashemikamangar, Sedighe Sadat
author_facet Tabatabaei, Masoomeh Hasani
Nahavandi, Alireza Mahmoudi
Khorshidi, Sotude
Hashemikamangar, Sedighe Sadat
author_sort Tabatabaei, Masoomeh Hasani
collection PubMed
description Objective  Lifelike esthetic appearance of dental restorations is among the main goals in restorative dentistry. This study aimed to assess and compare the opalescence and fluorescence of two dental composite resins. Materials and Methods  This in vitro experimental study evaluated the A2 shade of Filtek Z350 XT Enamel, Filtek Z350 XT Dentin, Aelite Aesthetic Enamel, and Aelite All Purpose Body composite resins. Composite discs were fabricated with 10 mm diameter and 0.5 and 1 mm thicknesses ( n = 2) using a plexiglass mold and subjected to colorimetry. The color parameters were determined according to the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) L*a*b* system using a spectrophotometer. The fluorescence and opalescence were also measured and reported separately for 0.5 and 1 mm thicknesses of Z350, Aelite Body, and Enamel composite resins. To determine the opalescence, the color of samples in the reflectance mode was measured using a calibration cylinder and in the transmittance mode in presence of 100% ultraviolet (UV) light. To determine the fluorescence, the color of samples against a white background in the reflectance mode in presence or absence of 100% UV light was measured. Statistical Analysis  Data were analyzed using SPSS via three-way analysis of variance and independent t -test. Results  The fluorescence of 0.5 mm thickness of all composites was higher than that of 1 mm thickness ( p < 0.05). The fluorescence of Aelite was higher than that of Z350 ( p < 0.05). The fluorescence of Aelite Enamel was higher than that of Aelite Body irrespective of their thickness, but the results were opposite for Z350 ( p < 0.05). In Aelite composite, opalescence increased by an increase in thickness ( p < 0.05). The opalescence of Aelite was significantly higher than that of Z350 ( p < 0.05). The opalescence of 0.5 mm thickness of Aelite Enamel was higher than that of Aelite Body, while the opalescence of 1 mm thickness of Z350 Body was higher than that of Z350 Enamel ( p < 0.05). Conclusion  Thickness, type, and brand of composite resins affected their fluorescence and opalescence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69384422020-01-06 Fluorescence and Opalescence of Two Dental Composite Resins Tabatabaei, Masoomeh Hasani Nahavandi, Alireza Mahmoudi Khorshidi, Sotude Hashemikamangar, Sedighe Sadat Eur J Dent Objective  Lifelike esthetic appearance of dental restorations is among the main goals in restorative dentistry. This study aimed to assess and compare the opalescence and fluorescence of two dental composite resins. Materials and Methods  This in vitro experimental study evaluated the A2 shade of Filtek Z350 XT Enamel, Filtek Z350 XT Dentin, Aelite Aesthetic Enamel, and Aelite All Purpose Body composite resins. Composite discs were fabricated with 10 mm diameter and 0.5 and 1 mm thicknesses ( n = 2) using a plexiglass mold and subjected to colorimetry. The color parameters were determined according to the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) L*a*b* system using a spectrophotometer. The fluorescence and opalescence were also measured and reported separately for 0.5 and 1 mm thicknesses of Z350, Aelite Body, and Enamel composite resins. To determine the opalescence, the color of samples in the reflectance mode was measured using a calibration cylinder and in the transmittance mode in presence of 100% ultraviolet (UV) light. To determine the fluorescence, the color of samples against a white background in the reflectance mode in presence or absence of 100% UV light was measured. Statistical Analysis  Data were analyzed using SPSS via three-way analysis of variance and independent t -test. Results  The fluorescence of 0.5 mm thickness of all composites was higher than that of 1 mm thickness ( p < 0.05). The fluorescence of Aelite was higher than that of Z350 ( p < 0.05). The fluorescence of Aelite Enamel was higher than that of Aelite Body irrespective of their thickness, but the results were opposite for Z350 ( p < 0.05). In Aelite composite, opalescence increased by an increase in thickness ( p < 0.05). The opalescence of Aelite was significantly higher than that of Z350 ( p < 0.05). The opalescence of 0.5 mm thickness of Aelite Enamel was higher than that of Aelite Body, while the opalescence of 1 mm thickness of Z350 Body was higher than that of Z350 Enamel ( p < 0.05). Conclusion  Thickness, type, and brand of composite resins affected their fluorescence and opalescence. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019-10 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6938442/ /pubmed/31891970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696899 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Tabatabaei, Masoomeh Hasani
Nahavandi, Alireza Mahmoudi
Khorshidi, Sotude
Hashemikamangar, Sedighe Sadat
Fluorescence and Opalescence of Two Dental Composite Resins
title Fluorescence and Opalescence of Two Dental Composite Resins
title_full Fluorescence and Opalescence of Two Dental Composite Resins
title_fullStr Fluorescence and Opalescence of Two Dental Composite Resins
title_full_unstemmed Fluorescence and Opalescence of Two Dental Composite Resins
title_short Fluorescence and Opalescence of Two Dental Composite Resins
title_sort fluorescence and opalescence of two dental composite resins
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31891970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696899
work_keys_str_mv AT tabatabaeimasoomehhasani fluorescenceandopalescenceoftwodentalcompositeresins
AT nahavandialirezamahmoudi fluorescenceandopalescenceoftwodentalcompositeresins
AT khorshidisotude fluorescenceandopalescenceoftwodentalcompositeresins
AT hashemikamangarsedighesadat fluorescenceandopalescenceoftwodentalcompositeresins