Cargando…

Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?

BACKGROUND: Individual radiosensitivity is influencing the outcome of radiation therapy. A general ex vivo testing is very work-intensive. It is of interest to see if a significant prediction concerning the sensitivity can be made by in vivo irradiation during radiation treatment. METHODS: Blood sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayo, Theresa, Haderlein, Marlen, Schuster, Barbara, Wiesmüller, Anna, Hummel, Christian, Bachl, Maximilian, Schmidt, Manfred, Fietkau, Rainer, Distel, Luitpold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1444-4
_version_ 1783484068414881792
author Mayo, Theresa
Haderlein, Marlen
Schuster, Barbara
Wiesmüller, Anna
Hummel, Christian
Bachl, Maximilian
Schmidt, Manfred
Fietkau, Rainer
Distel, Luitpold
author_facet Mayo, Theresa
Haderlein, Marlen
Schuster, Barbara
Wiesmüller, Anna
Hummel, Christian
Bachl, Maximilian
Schmidt, Manfred
Fietkau, Rainer
Distel, Luitpold
author_sort Mayo, Theresa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individual radiosensitivity is influencing the outcome of radiation therapy. A general ex vivo testing is very work-intensive. It is of interest to see if a significant prediction concerning the sensitivity can be made by in vivo irradiation during radiation treatment. METHODS: Blood samples of 274 patients with rectal cancer and 43 lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy were examined after 2 Gy ex vivo and in vivo ionizing radiation. Chromosomes # 1, 2 and 4 were stained by the 3-color-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosomal aberrations were analyzed as breaks per metaphase (B/M). The deposited energy per session was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Weak correlation could be found between the chromosomal aberrations ex and in vivo. Though receiving significantly smaller deposited energy during radiation therapy (RT) the lung cancer cohort displayed B/M values similar to the rectal cancer cohort. Considering the individual deposit energy differences improved slightly the correlation. CONCLUSIONS: As various factors influence the induction of chromosomal aberrations it seems not feasible to estimate individual radiosensitivity via in vivo irradiation. An ex vivo estimation of individual radiosensitivity should be preferred.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69386182020-01-06 Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? Mayo, Theresa Haderlein, Marlen Schuster, Barbara Wiesmüller, Anna Hummel, Christian Bachl, Maximilian Schmidt, Manfred Fietkau, Rainer Distel, Luitpold Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Individual radiosensitivity is influencing the outcome of radiation therapy. A general ex vivo testing is very work-intensive. It is of interest to see if a significant prediction concerning the sensitivity can be made by in vivo irradiation during radiation treatment. METHODS: Blood samples of 274 patients with rectal cancer and 43 lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy were examined after 2 Gy ex vivo and in vivo ionizing radiation. Chromosomes # 1, 2 and 4 were stained by the 3-color-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosomal aberrations were analyzed as breaks per metaphase (B/M). The deposited energy per session was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Weak correlation could be found between the chromosomal aberrations ex and in vivo. Though receiving significantly smaller deposited energy during radiation therapy (RT) the lung cancer cohort displayed B/M values similar to the rectal cancer cohort. Considering the individual deposit energy differences improved slightly the correlation. CONCLUSIONS: As various factors influence the induction of chromosomal aberrations it seems not feasible to estimate individual radiosensitivity via in vivo irradiation. An ex vivo estimation of individual radiosensitivity should be preferred. BioMed Central 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6938618/ /pubmed/31892333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1444-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mayo, Theresa
Haderlein, Marlen
Schuster, Barbara
Wiesmüller, Anna
Hummel, Christian
Bachl, Maximilian
Schmidt, Manfred
Fietkau, Rainer
Distel, Luitpold
Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?
title Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?
title_full Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?
title_fullStr Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?
title_full_unstemmed Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?
title_short Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?
title_sort is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1444-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mayotheresa isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization
AT haderleinmarlen isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization
AT schusterbarbara isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization
AT wiesmulleranna isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization
AT hummelchristian isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization
AT bachlmaximilian isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization
AT schmidtmanfred isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization
AT fietkaurainer isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization
AT distelluitpold isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization