Cargando…
Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization?
BACKGROUND: Individual radiosensitivity is influencing the outcome of radiation therapy. A general ex vivo testing is very work-intensive. It is of interest to see if a significant prediction concerning the sensitivity can be made by in vivo irradiation during radiation treatment. METHODS: Blood sam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1444-4 |
_version_ | 1783484068414881792 |
---|---|
author | Mayo, Theresa Haderlein, Marlen Schuster, Barbara Wiesmüller, Anna Hummel, Christian Bachl, Maximilian Schmidt, Manfred Fietkau, Rainer Distel, Luitpold |
author_facet | Mayo, Theresa Haderlein, Marlen Schuster, Barbara Wiesmüller, Anna Hummel, Christian Bachl, Maximilian Schmidt, Manfred Fietkau, Rainer Distel, Luitpold |
author_sort | Mayo, Theresa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Individual radiosensitivity is influencing the outcome of radiation therapy. A general ex vivo testing is very work-intensive. It is of interest to see if a significant prediction concerning the sensitivity can be made by in vivo irradiation during radiation treatment. METHODS: Blood samples of 274 patients with rectal cancer and 43 lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy were examined after 2 Gy ex vivo and in vivo ionizing radiation. Chromosomes # 1, 2 and 4 were stained by the 3-color-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosomal aberrations were analyzed as breaks per metaphase (B/M). The deposited energy per session was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Weak correlation could be found between the chromosomal aberrations ex and in vivo. Though receiving significantly smaller deposited energy during radiation therapy (RT) the lung cancer cohort displayed B/M values similar to the rectal cancer cohort. Considering the individual deposit energy differences improved slightly the correlation. CONCLUSIONS: As various factors influence the induction of chromosomal aberrations it seems not feasible to estimate individual radiosensitivity via in vivo irradiation. An ex vivo estimation of individual radiosensitivity should be preferred. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6938618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69386182020-01-06 Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? Mayo, Theresa Haderlein, Marlen Schuster, Barbara Wiesmüller, Anna Hummel, Christian Bachl, Maximilian Schmidt, Manfred Fietkau, Rainer Distel, Luitpold Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Individual radiosensitivity is influencing the outcome of radiation therapy. A general ex vivo testing is very work-intensive. It is of interest to see if a significant prediction concerning the sensitivity can be made by in vivo irradiation during radiation treatment. METHODS: Blood samples of 274 patients with rectal cancer and 43 lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy were examined after 2 Gy ex vivo and in vivo ionizing radiation. Chromosomes # 1, 2 and 4 were stained by the 3-color-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosomal aberrations were analyzed as breaks per metaphase (B/M). The deposited energy per session was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Weak correlation could be found between the chromosomal aberrations ex and in vivo. Though receiving significantly smaller deposited energy during radiation therapy (RT) the lung cancer cohort displayed B/M values similar to the rectal cancer cohort. Considering the individual deposit energy differences improved slightly the correlation. CONCLUSIONS: As various factors influence the induction of chromosomal aberrations it seems not feasible to estimate individual radiosensitivity via in vivo irradiation. An ex vivo estimation of individual radiosensitivity should be preferred. BioMed Central 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6938618/ /pubmed/31892333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1444-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Mayo, Theresa Haderlein, Marlen Schuster, Barbara Wiesmüller, Anna Hummel, Christian Bachl, Maximilian Schmidt, Manfred Fietkau, Rainer Distel, Luitpold Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? |
title | Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? |
title_full | Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? |
title_fullStr | Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? |
title_short | Is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual Radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? |
title_sort | is in vivo and ex vivo irradiation equally reliable for individual radiosensitivity testing by three colour fluorescence in situ hybridization? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1444-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayotheresa isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization AT haderleinmarlen isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization AT schusterbarbara isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization AT wiesmulleranna isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization AT hummelchristian isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization AT bachlmaximilian isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization AT schmidtmanfred isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization AT fietkaurainer isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization AT distelluitpold isinvivoandexvivoirradiationequallyreliableforindividualradiosensitivitytestingbythreecolourfluorescenceinsituhybridization |