Cargando…

HMGB1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material

BACKGROUND: HMGB1 is a mediator of systemic inflammation in sepsis and trauma, and a promising biomarker in many diseases. There is currently no standard operating procedure for pre-analytical handling of HMGB1 samples, despite that pre-analytical conditions account for a substantial part of the ove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ottestad, William, Rognes, Ingrid N., Skaga, Erlend, Frisvoll, Cassandra, Haraldsen, Guttorm, Eken, Torsten, Lundbäck, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10020-019-0131-0
_version_ 1783484068871012352
author Ottestad, William
Rognes, Ingrid N.
Skaga, Erlend
Frisvoll, Cassandra
Haraldsen, Guttorm
Eken, Torsten
Lundbäck, Peter
author_facet Ottestad, William
Rognes, Ingrid N.
Skaga, Erlend
Frisvoll, Cassandra
Haraldsen, Guttorm
Eken, Torsten
Lundbäck, Peter
author_sort Ottestad, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HMGB1 is a mediator of systemic inflammation in sepsis and trauma, and a promising biomarker in many diseases. There is currently no standard operating procedure for pre-analytical handling of HMGB1 samples, despite that pre-analytical conditions account for a substantial part of the overall error rate in laboratory testing. We hypothesized that the considerable variations in reported HMGB1 concentrations and kinetics in trauma patients could be partly explained by differences in pre-analytical conditions and choice of sample material. METHODS: Trauma patients (n = 21) admitted to a Norwegian Level I trauma center were prospectively included. Blood was drawn in K(2)EDTA coated tubes and serum tubes. The effects of delayed centrifugation were evaluated in samples stored at room temperature for 15 min, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h respectively. Plasma samples subjected to long-term storage in − 80 °C and to repeated freeze/thaw cycles were compared with previously analyzed samples. HMGB1 concentrations in simultaneously acquired arterial and venous samples were also compared. HMGB1 was assessed by standard ELISA technique, additionally we investigated the suitability of western blot in both serum and plasma samples. RESULTS: Arterial HMGB1 concentrations were consistently lower than venous concentrations in simultaneously obtained samples (arterial = 0.60 x venous; 95% CI 0.30–0.90). Concentrations in plasma and serum showed a strong linear correlation, however wide limits of agreement. Storage of blood samples at room temperature prior to centrifugation resulted in an exponential increase in plasma concentrations after ≈6 h. HMGB1 concentrations were fairly stable in centrifuged plasma samples subjected to long-term storage and freeze/thaw cycles. We were not able to detect HMGB1 in either serum or plasma from our trauma patients using western blotting. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial and venous HMGB1 concentrations cannot be directly compared, and concentration values in plasma and serum must be compared with caution due to wide limits of agreement. Although HMGB1 levels in clinical samples from trauma patients are fairly stable, strict adherence to a pre-analytical protocol is advisable in order to protect sample integrity. Surprisingly, we were unable to detect HMGB1 utilizing standard western blot analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69386202020-01-06 HMGB1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material Ottestad, William Rognes, Ingrid N. Skaga, Erlend Frisvoll, Cassandra Haraldsen, Guttorm Eken, Torsten Lundbäck, Peter Mol Med Research Article BACKGROUND: HMGB1 is a mediator of systemic inflammation in sepsis and trauma, and a promising biomarker in many diseases. There is currently no standard operating procedure for pre-analytical handling of HMGB1 samples, despite that pre-analytical conditions account for a substantial part of the overall error rate in laboratory testing. We hypothesized that the considerable variations in reported HMGB1 concentrations and kinetics in trauma patients could be partly explained by differences in pre-analytical conditions and choice of sample material. METHODS: Trauma patients (n = 21) admitted to a Norwegian Level I trauma center were prospectively included. Blood was drawn in K(2)EDTA coated tubes and serum tubes. The effects of delayed centrifugation were evaluated in samples stored at room temperature for 15 min, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h respectively. Plasma samples subjected to long-term storage in − 80 °C and to repeated freeze/thaw cycles were compared with previously analyzed samples. HMGB1 concentrations in simultaneously acquired arterial and venous samples were also compared. HMGB1 was assessed by standard ELISA technique, additionally we investigated the suitability of western blot in both serum and plasma samples. RESULTS: Arterial HMGB1 concentrations were consistently lower than venous concentrations in simultaneously obtained samples (arterial = 0.60 x venous; 95% CI 0.30–0.90). Concentrations in plasma and serum showed a strong linear correlation, however wide limits of agreement. Storage of blood samples at room temperature prior to centrifugation resulted in an exponential increase in plasma concentrations after ≈6 h. HMGB1 concentrations were fairly stable in centrifuged plasma samples subjected to long-term storage and freeze/thaw cycles. We were not able to detect HMGB1 in either serum or plasma from our trauma patients using western blotting. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial and venous HMGB1 concentrations cannot be directly compared, and concentration values in plasma and serum must be compared with caution due to wide limits of agreement. Although HMGB1 levels in clinical samples from trauma patients are fairly stable, strict adherence to a pre-analytical protocol is advisable in order to protect sample integrity. Surprisingly, we were unable to detect HMGB1 utilizing standard western blot analysis. BioMed Central 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6938620/ /pubmed/31892315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10020-019-0131-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ottestad, William
Rognes, Ingrid N.
Skaga, Erlend
Frisvoll, Cassandra
Haraldsen, Guttorm
Eken, Torsten
Lundbäck, Peter
HMGB1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material
title HMGB1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material
title_full HMGB1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material
title_fullStr HMGB1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material
title_full_unstemmed HMGB1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material
title_short HMGB1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material
title_sort hmgb1 concentration measurements in trauma patients: assessment of pre-analytical conditions and sample material
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10020-019-0131-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ottestadwilliam hmgb1concentrationmeasurementsintraumapatientsassessmentofpreanalyticalconditionsandsamplematerial
AT rognesingridn hmgb1concentrationmeasurementsintraumapatientsassessmentofpreanalyticalconditionsandsamplematerial
AT skagaerlend hmgb1concentrationmeasurementsintraumapatientsassessmentofpreanalyticalconditionsandsamplematerial
AT frisvollcassandra hmgb1concentrationmeasurementsintraumapatientsassessmentofpreanalyticalconditionsandsamplematerial
AT haraldsenguttorm hmgb1concentrationmeasurementsintraumapatientsassessmentofpreanalyticalconditionsandsamplematerial
AT ekentorsten hmgb1concentrationmeasurementsintraumapatientsassessmentofpreanalyticalconditionsandsamplematerial
AT lundbackpeter hmgb1concentrationmeasurementsintraumapatientsassessmentofpreanalyticalconditionsandsamplematerial