Cargando…

Pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dGEMRIC when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity

BACKGROUND: The dGEMRIC (delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of Cartilage) technique has been used in numerous studies for quantitative in vivo evaluation of the relative glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in cartilage. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of pre-contrast T1 and cartila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiderius, Carl Johan, Hawezi, Zana K., Olsson, Lars E., Dahlberg, Leif E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0399-0
_version_ 1783484072835678208
author Tiderius, Carl Johan
Hawezi, Zana K.
Olsson, Lars E.
Dahlberg, Leif E.
author_facet Tiderius, Carl Johan
Hawezi, Zana K.
Olsson, Lars E.
Dahlberg, Leif E.
author_sort Tiderius, Carl Johan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The dGEMRIC (delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of Cartilage) technique has been used in numerous studies for quantitative in vivo evaluation of the relative glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in cartilage. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness when assessing knee joint cartilage quality with dGEMRIC. METHODS: Cartilage thickness and T1 relaxation time were measured in the central part of the femoral condyles before and two hours after intravenous Gd-DTPA(2−) administration in 17 healthy volunteers from a previous study divided into two groups: 9 sedentary volunteers and 8 exercising elite runners. Results were analyzed in superficial and a deep weight-bearing, as well as in non-weight-bearing regions of interest. RESULTS: In the medial compartment, the cartilage was thicker in the exercising group, in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing segments. In most of the segments, the T1 pre-contrast value was longer in the exercising group compared to the sedentary group. Both groups had a longer pre-contrast T1 in the superficial cartilage than in the deep cartilage. In the superficial cartilage, the gadolinium concentration was independent of cartilage thickness. In contrast, there was a linear correlation between the gadolinium concentration and cartilage thickness in the deep cartilage region. CONCLUSION: Cartilage pre-contrast T1 and thickness are sources of error in dGEMRIC that should be considered when analysing bulk values. Our results indicate that differences in cartilage structure due to exercise and weight-bearing may be less pronounced than previously demonstrated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69386372020-01-06 Pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dGEMRIC when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity Tiderius, Carl Johan Hawezi, Zana K. Olsson, Lars E. Dahlberg, Leif E. BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: The dGEMRIC (delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of Cartilage) technique has been used in numerous studies for quantitative in vivo evaluation of the relative glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in cartilage. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness when assessing knee joint cartilage quality with dGEMRIC. METHODS: Cartilage thickness and T1 relaxation time were measured in the central part of the femoral condyles before and two hours after intravenous Gd-DTPA(2−) administration in 17 healthy volunteers from a previous study divided into two groups: 9 sedentary volunteers and 8 exercising elite runners. Results were analyzed in superficial and a deep weight-bearing, as well as in non-weight-bearing regions of interest. RESULTS: In the medial compartment, the cartilage was thicker in the exercising group, in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing segments. In most of the segments, the T1 pre-contrast value was longer in the exercising group compared to the sedentary group. Both groups had a longer pre-contrast T1 in the superficial cartilage than in the deep cartilage. In the superficial cartilage, the gadolinium concentration was independent of cartilage thickness. In contrast, there was a linear correlation between the gadolinium concentration and cartilage thickness in the deep cartilage region. CONCLUSION: Cartilage pre-contrast T1 and thickness are sources of error in dGEMRIC that should be considered when analysing bulk values. Our results indicate that differences in cartilage structure due to exercise and weight-bearing may be less pronounced than previously demonstrated. BioMed Central 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6938637/ /pubmed/31892314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0399-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tiderius, Carl Johan
Hawezi, Zana K.
Olsson, Lars E.
Dahlberg, Leif E.
Pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dGEMRIC when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity
title Pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dGEMRIC when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity
title_full Pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dGEMRIC when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity
title_fullStr Pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dGEMRIC when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity
title_full_unstemmed Pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dGEMRIC when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity
title_short Pre-contrast T1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dGEMRIC when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity
title_sort pre-contrast t1 and cartilage thickness as confounding factors in dgemric when evaluating human cartilage adaptation to physical activity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0399-0
work_keys_str_mv AT tideriuscarljohan precontrastt1andcartilagethicknessasconfoundingfactorsindgemricwhenevaluatinghumancartilageadaptationtophysicalactivity
AT hawezizanak precontrastt1andcartilagethicknessasconfoundingfactorsindgemricwhenevaluatinghumancartilageadaptationtophysicalactivity
AT olssonlarse precontrastt1andcartilagethicknessasconfoundingfactorsindgemricwhenevaluatinghumancartilageadaptationtophysicalactivity
AT dahlbergleife precontrastt1andcartilagethicknessasconfoundingfactorsindgemricwhenevaluatinghumancartilageadaptationtophysicalactivity