Cargando…

Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus

Despite its iconic status as the king of dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex biology is incompletely understood. Here, we examine femur and tibia bone microstructure from two half-grown T. rex specimens, permitting the assessments of age, growth rate, and maturity necessary for investigating the early life...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodward, Holly N., Tremaine, Katie, Williams, Scott A., Zanno, Lindsay E., Horner, John R., Myhrvold, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax6250
_version_ 1783484078813609984
author Woodward, Holly N.
Tremaine, Katie
Williams, Scott A.
Zanno, Lindsay E.
Horner, John R.
Myhrvold, Nathan
author_facet Woodward, Holly N.
Tremaine, Katie
Williams, Scott A.
Zanno, Lindsay E.
Horner, John R.
Myhrvold, Nathan
author_sort Woodward, Holly N.
collection PubMed
description Despite its iconic status as the king of dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex biology is incompletely understood. Here, we examine femur and tibia bone microstructure from two half-grown T. rex specimens, permitting the assessments of age, growth rate, and maturity necessary for investigating the early life history of this giant theropod. Osteohistology reveals these were immature individuals 13 to 15 years of age, exhibiting growth rates similar to extant birds and mammals, and that annual growth was dependent on resource abundance. Together, our results support the synonomization of “Nanotyrannus” into Tyrannosaurus and fail to support the hypothesized presence of a sympatric tyrannosaurid species of markedly smaller adult body size. Our independent data contribute to mounting evidence for a rapid shift in body size associated with ontogenetic niche partitioning late in T. rex ontogeny and suggest that this species singularly exploited mid- to large-sized theropod niches at the end of the Cretaceous.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69386972020-01-07 Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus Woodward, Holly N. Tremaine, Katie Williams, Scott A. Zanno, Lindsay E. Horner, John R. Myhrvold, Nathan Sci Adv Research Articles Despite its iconic status as the king of dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex biology is incompletely understood. Here, we examine femur and tibia bone microstructure from two half-grown T. rex specimens, permitting the assessments of age, growth rate, and maturity necessary for investigating the early life history of this giant theropod. Osteohistology reveals these were immature individuals 13 to 15 years of age, exhibiting growth rates similar to extant birds and mammals, and that annual growth was dependent on resource abundance. Together, our results support the synonomization of “Nanotyrannus” into Tyrannosaurus and fail to support the hypothesized presence of a sympatric tyrannosaurid species of markedly smaller adult body size. Our independent data contribute to mounting evidence for a rapid shift in body size associated with ontogenetic niche partitioning late in T. rex ontogeny and suggest that this species singularly exploited mid- to large-sized theropod niches at the end of the Cretaceous. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6938697/ /pubmed/31911944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax6250 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Woodward, Holly N.
Tremaine, Katie
Williams, Scott A.
Zanno, Lindsay E.
Horner, John R.
Myhrvold, Nathan
Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus
title Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus
title_full Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus
title_fullStr Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus
title_full_unstemmed Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus
title_short Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus
title_sort growing up tyrannosaurus rex: osteohistology refutes the pygmy “nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile tyrannosaurus
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax6250
work_keys_str_mv AT woodwardhollyn growinguptyrannosaurusrexosteohistologyrefutesthepygmynanotyrannusandsupportsontogeneticnichepartitioninginjuveniletyrannosaurus
AT tremainekatie growinguptyrannosaurusrexosteohistologyrefutesthepygmynanotyrannusandsupportsontogeneticnichepartitioninginjuveniletyrannosaurus
AT williamsscotta growinguptyrannosaurusrexosteohistologyrefutesthepygmynanotyrannusandsupportsontogeneticnichepartitioninginjuveniletyrannosaurus
AT zannolindsaye growinguptyrannosaurusrexosteohistologyrefutesthepygmynanotyrannusandsupportsontogeneticnichepartitioninginjuveniletyrannosaurus
AT hornerjohnr growinguptyrannosaurusrexosteohistologyrefutesthepygmynanotyrannusandsupportsontogeneticnichepartitioninginjuveniletyrannosaurus
AT myhrvoldnathan growinguptyrannosaurusrexosteohistologyrefutesthepygmynanotyrannusandsupportsontogeneticnichepartitioninginjuveniletyrannosaurus